Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

Surface Temperature And Noise Level

500GB Per Platter: Three Next-Gen 7,200 RPM Hard Drives
By

Drive Surface Temperature

Noise Level

Display all 55 comments.
This thread is closed for comments
Top Comments
  • 11 Hide
    findarato , October 29, 2009 1:48 PM
    2TB is a lot of data to loose, at that level you should do something like raid 1, or 5
Other Comments
  • 1 Hide
    wira020 , October 29, 2009 12:44 PM
    OK, i'm confused... does this mean velociraptor is no longer the fastest hard drive drive?... i'm sorry but i'm not very good at this... i'm thinking of building a system for gaming... SSD is out of the option so was thinking of getting velociraptor... so can sum1 clears it for me?
  • 11 Hide
    findarato , October 29, 2009 1:48 PM
    2TB is a lot of data to loose, at that level you should do something like raid 1, or 5
  • 0 Hide
    jonpaul37 , October 29, 2009 3:02 PM
    Terabyte me! X 2!

    Nice performance here! Thanks for coming in today and keep up the good work
  • 3 Hide
    vgdarkstar , October 29, 2009 3:04 PM
    No Barracuda 12?
  • 0 Hide
    Jerky_san , October 29, 2009 3:19 PM
    Nice stuff.. Even though the power consumption at idle is a little on the high side for the WD's i doubt the people these are focused on give a crap..
  • -5 Hide
    IzzyCraft , October 29, 2009 3:29 PM
    Barracuda .12 is just a revision of the .11 with new firmware for the different cache size i believe.
  • 0 Hide
    pharge , October 29, 2009 3:41 PM
    "Sadly enough, while most platforms are stuffed with useful and sometimes useless features, most lack the EFI and GPT support needed to take full advantage of future hard drives larger than 2TB."

    Yea... Though I may prefer to keep my boot drive nice clean and neat while leaving all my stuffs/junks/games on my data drive, it is still sad that our boot drives are/will be still limited at the 2TB.

    Maybe in the future (or now for the people w/ big budget)... booting from a 2TB high performance/or RAID HD.

    But... anyway... it is still sad that I will be stuck in that 2TB barrier for a while... unless I move to Apple system (which is very unlikely)..... :( 
  • 1 Hide
    amnotanoobie , October 29, 2009 3:44 PM
    7amoodThere should be a stress test that estimates the real time before drive failure, after all, 2TB is a lot of data to lose... if got bitten before.I hope to see such test soon.


    With so many possible parts that could fail, even if Tom's did that it wouldn't realistically represent what the other million consumers might experience. Also a good drive would probably break in years, by the time you read that review you're already looking at a new generation of hard drives that are released to market (then the cycle starts again).
  • 0 Hide
    pharge , October 29, 2009 3:46 PM
    ugh... sorry... one part of my post was lost... here is the correction...

    ...Maybe in the future (or now for the people w/ big budget)... booting from a smaller SSD and run everything else on those larger than 2TB high performance/or RAID HD.

    sorry about the mistake

    TOMS! we need the EDIT function!!!!!

  • 0 Hide
    amnotanoobie , October 29, 2009 3:46 PM
    IzzyCraftBarracuda .12 is just a revision of the .11 with new firmware for the different cache size i believe.


    LOL, the .11 was a 2 platter drive, the .12 is a single platter drive. Their performance is different so cache is probably not the only thing changed.

    EDIT: The 7200.12 was the first 500GB per platter drive that Seagate released. The 1TB version uses 2 platters. (Izzycraft obviously took the term 'single platter drive' too literally).
  • -4 Hide
    cybrcatter , October 29, 2009 4:24 PM
    I love the direction that storage technology is going.
    SSD are getting cheap enough for my ever increasing impatience for a fast loading OS, and HDDs are getting bigger for my every increasing p0r... er movie collection :) 
  • 3 Hide
    asymtote , October 29, 2009 4:27 PM
    @wira020: The Velociraptor (and other 10k or 15k rpm drives) can be beaten in performance by lower speed, higher capacity drives because of their density. A 150GB 3.5" drive vs a 2TB 3.5" drive means that up to 13.3x the data can pass over the heads on the larger capacity drive. A 1.4x rotational speed difference can't make up for that. Not to mention that the Velociraptor drives aren't even 3.5", so you don't get the extra performance from the edge of the platter where it moves past the head at a faster tangential velocity. Obviously this isn't the whole story, or 10k drives wouldn't sell, but my point remains. Horray for physics!
  • -2 Hide
    thackstonns , October 29, 2009 4:52 PM
    Samsung f3 1 tb drives have been available for a while now. I have 2. And they beet the wd drives and only cost like 80bucks oem on newegg. Wd lost my money this time because you have to buy the RE drives at a price premium if you want raid.
  • 0 Hide
    sublifer , October 29, 2009 5:15 PM
    comparison with a few SAS and SSD drives would be nice just to see how "standard" drives compare.
  • -7 Hide
    IzzyCraft , October 29, 2009 5:15 PM
    amnotanoobieLOL, the .11 was a 2 platter drive, the .12 is a single platter drive. Their performance is different so cache is probably not the only thing changed.

    So seagate has
    250gb-1TB is the size of the 7200.12
    So Seagate wins they already sell 1 tb single platter drives for only 90 bucks
    The 250 and the 320gb are single platter but that's it the difference is the cache which is reduced or bigger bah i can't remember.
  • 1 Hide
    Zinosys , October 29, 2009 5:21 PM
    I'm also surprised. The 7200.12 (from the results of Tom's HDD Benchies) looks like a very nice drive. I bet the 7200.12 feels left out. :( 
  • -1 Hide
    silky salamandr , October 29, 2009 7:15 PM
    Man Im really paranoid of dumping 2tb on a drive and have it fail. I would die if I lost 2tb worth of data. Im a backup freak. Im running a 750gb wd black partitioned out to run 7 and a seagate 7200.12 1tb and I also have a 320gig usb harddrive. I keep backups on all 3 of my drives.

    I would rather add more 1tb harddrives then one 2tb drive.
  • 2 Hide
    mlopinto2k1 , October 29, 2009 7:26 PM
    It'll just keep getting bigger and bigger.. I remember when 200MB's on a hardware was huge, then 1GB!!!! WOOOOOOAH! Cmon now people, it's impressive but HIGHLY predictable. It'll be 100TB's before you know it then they will be hitting 1PB. Inevitable. As far as a lot of data to lose? ABSOLUTELY. I hate hard drives for that.
  • 0 Hide
    empstar , October 29, 2009 7:56 PM
    WHO SAY SEAGATE DON'T HANE 2YB , 7200RPM HDD ?!

    http://www.seagate.com/www/en-us/products/desktops/barracuda_hard_drives/barracuda_xt/?intcmp=bac-en-us-home-h_hero3-barracuda-xt

    A massive 2-TB drive capacity .....
    The 7200-RPM performance .....
    A 64-MB cache optimizes .....
    The SATA 6Gb/s interface enables the use of the industry‘s newest and fastest hard drive controllers while providing backward compatibility to legacy SATA 1.5Gb/s or 3Gb/s systems.
Display more comments