- Hard Disk Drive Video Players Hit The Mainstream
- The Optoma EP729 Road Warrior Projector
- Pinnacle Showcenter 200 Brings HD To The Living Room
- VGA Charts VII: AGP Update Summer 2005
- 24 Pipelines of Power! NVIDIA 7800 GTX
- Nvidia Launches GeForce 7800 GTX Graphics Chip
- Divx 6: High-Resolution Video Saves Space
- Diamond XtremeTV PVR-550RC: Not Quite Ready for Prime Time
- Capturing Videos using the Turtle Beach Video Advantage
- ATI Puts NVIDIA's SLI in the CrossFire
- Intel or Nvidia? nForce 680i Challenges Intel P965 and 975X
- Intel Roadmap News 10/2000: Part Two, Intel's Future Mobile and...
- Intel's Next Paper Release: The Pentium III at 1133 MHz
- Are Intel's Integrated Graphics Processors Good Enough for Gaming?
- Intel's Big Kick Off: 925XE Chipset and P4EE 3.46 GHz
- Read the power supply faq's still a tad confused
- Q6600 into a dell xps 410
- which is better intel core2 duo T8100 or T7250
- Why doesn't Toms maintain this chart anymore?
- No Sound but Card Recognized: Creative SB 5.1 Live! and XP
- Q6700 justified?
- 6420 oc. temp issues. is this offset ok or not ?
- Need help with overclocking Asus 750i - Q6600 at 3.4ghz
- Overclocking a Q9450
- Can a Q6600 with VID 1.325 hit 3.6GHz?
Are Intel's Integrated Graphics Processors Good Enough for Gaming? : Introduction
Introduction

THG spends a lot of time covering the latest and greatest graphics cards, CPUs, memory and other components required to bring you the best gaming experience that money can buy. However, the very best of the best simply doesn't make sense for everyone.
Consider that while many of us would love to invest over a month's salary in a bleeding-edge machine, we can't - or at least common sense dictates that we shouldn't - spend that much on a system that will only be considered a LAN party dinosaur in a few months.
Similarly, there are budget-minded customers who seek decent but not great graphics performance, without the added expense of a graphics card. There are folks who have several PCs in their houses, perhaps for children who want to play games, and don't have the money to spend to add a graphics card for every PC. Finally, consider the road warrior who travels with a notebook and wants to play Doom III.
The usual solution in these cases is integrated graphics. But many feel that in the past they have been burned when Intel claimed that its integrated graphics processors (IGPs) were good enough to run their favorite 3D games without the added horsepower of a graphics card. The results were often disappointing at best, due to driver compatibility problems, or a lack of graphics processing power needed just to get some games to run.
With the launch of newer devices, such as Intel's GMA 950 integrated processor and 945G chipset, have times changed? The short answer is that Intel's latest-generation integrated processors have shown a lot of improvements compared to their predecessors. They can at least get you started with graphically-intensive games such as Doom III or the latest GTA when played at low resolutions.
As we showed earlier this year, games can in fact be played with integrated graphics, but not very well. Our tests of the Dell Latitude D610 with the 900GMA integrated graphics core and 915GM chipset showed that smooth gaming above VGA resolution was not possible when playing Doom3 or Farcry. But at least you can get some of the newer, graphically-intensive games to run without a graphics card - which wasn't always the case in the past.
Despite the improvements, Intel representatives say that the company's developers continue not to focus on gaming when they design next-generation graphics parts. Game play is an important criteria when it comes to integrated graphics processor designs, but other issues, such as cost and power consumption, are viewed as more essential.
- Next page Intel's Philosophy As The Graphics King

