Best offers
|
Core i7 I7-920 Quad Core Processor... | $349.99 Dell Home More info |
|
Phenom II X4 965 Black Edition Quad... | $189.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Core i5 750 Qaud Core Processor... | $199.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
Core i7 Extreme Edition I7-975 Quad... | $974.99 TigerDirect More info |
|
Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition Quad... | $174.99 TigerDirect More info |
Partners
The Games selection
violent :
More Mindless Violence
Basic shooting game, but still so powerful! Use the mouse to take aim and shoot at the little beasties before they get to you. Use Space to reload....
|
action :
Yoyo the Star
Yoyo is a young girl who recently graduated and dreams to become a movie star (don't we all). You'll have to guide her on the path to stardom,...
|
Sponsored links
Intel's Pentium Performance Hangs on a Hyper-Thread
- Email |
- Print |
- Comment (1) |
- Share
Table of contents
- 1 – Introduction
- 2 – Non-intentional Benefits For HT-ready Applications
- 3 – Two Threads Are Better Than One
- 4 – The Pipeline
Intel has quietly begun to deviate from its self-perpetuated myth that processor performance is based on clock-speed alone: Intel's new 3.06 GHz Pentium 4 offers Hyper-Threading, a technology that Intel says offers up to a 24% performance gain independent of clock speed. The launch follows Intel's debut of its Pentium 4 with an excessively long pipeline of 20-stages two years ago that boosted clock speed to the detriment of processor performance.
Intel will likely continue to throw a substantial portion of its billion-dollar marketing budget to perpetuate the clock-speed myth in the average consumer's mind that processor performance is measured by clock speed alone. But after the debut of the HT technology in its desktop CPU line, incremental performance gains in new Pentium processors will no longer be measured by pure Megahertz levels, Intel said.
Enter Hyper-Threading
Simply put, HT allows one processor to serve as two physical processors while the OS and other programs are tricked into thinking that there are actually two working physical processors. The benefits are twofold: when multitasking, HT will allow you take about any combination of desktop applications with HT, run them simultaneously and then get some level of benefit depending on the application you are running, measured by task-completion benchmarks.
For example, you put on a slide show with music. While encoding the music, you manipulate images at the same time. The encoding process in the background is going to finish faster. While you will still have a quick responsive imaging experience in the foreground, in the past you may have had to wait and may not have had a responsive environment. And in some cases, the foreground application may have ground to a halt.
For office applications, virus scanning and encryption cranked up to the maximum take up IC computing power. When you are working on basic tasks in the foreground with a simple virus scan operating in the background, opening up a large PowerPoint file can take a lot of time. But instead of taking several minutes without HT, opening up the PowerPoint presentation might just take a few seconds.
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- Temperature questions
- Golden Chip ? (E8400 @ 4 GHz)
- Successfully ran a E6600 to 3.1Ghz, accidently reset cmos, &...
- OC'ing phenom II 940 BE
- I HATE APPLE.
- Help with choosing RAM DDR3
- Computer powers on, but does not boot
- EP45-UD3R Erratic IDE recognition & no sound
- Which Memory for Q8200 Build
- Motherboard Recommedations?
- Upgrade? Athlon 64 3500+ and GeForce 8600GT rig.
- First Build
- Advice for a Newcomer.
- NEW PC BUiLD





