Page 1:From Pentium 4 to Core 2: Power Consumption Analyzed
Page 2:Processors at 3.0 GHz
Page 3:Pentium D 830
Page 4:Core 2 Duo E6850
Page 5:Core 2 Extreme QX6850
Page 6:Test Setup
Page 7:Benchmark Results
Page 8:SYSmark 2007: Productivity
Page 9:Power Consumption Tests
Page 10:Performance vs. Power Consumption Diagram
Processors at 3.0 GHz
Although Intel has been adjusting the specifications for Socket 775 with every new processor generation, the socket has retained compatibility with older Socket 775 processors. While you will need a new motherboard to run a Core 2 Duo (especially the upcoming 45 nm Penryn generation scheduled for Q1 2008), it is possible to even run an old Pentium 4 in many of today's Socket 775 motherboards. Thanks to this happy circumstance, we were able to run four different processor types on our reference test system.
We picked a common clock speed, which can be set for all processors in this lineup. We would have preferred to select a clock speed in the area between 2.6 and 2.8 GHz, but it was not possible to find a common clock speed setting for all CPUs due to varying Front Side Bus (FSB) speed requirements. Hence we chose to go with 3.0 GHz, which can be reached by both Core 2 processors at FSB1333 speed and by the Pentiums at FSB800. In case of the Core 2 systems, the memory operated at 533 MHz (DDR3-1066 at CL7-7-7-20 timings), while the Pentium processors were backed by DDR3 memory running at 400 MHz (DDR3-800 and CL6-6-6-18 timings). These are the default settings as offered by the Asus P5E3 X38 motherboards. Higher memory speeds and timings would increase the power requirements, but only to a very small degree, which is certainly negligible in the context of 77 to 203 W total system power requirements.
Installing each of the following processors and setting them to run at our target clock speed of 3.0 GHz was amazingly painless. We used the Asus P5E3 Deluxe motherboard, running BIOS version 0402, dated September 19, 2007.
Pentium 4 630
The Pentium 4 600 series was an upgrade to the Pentium a 500 series, offering a 2 MB L2 cache instead of 1 MB on its 90 nm Prescott core, along with a plethora of improvements. While the P4 500 series based on the Prescott core didn't really deliver more performance than the 130 nm Northwood core - despite the doubled cache capacity - the 2 MB version introduced Enhanced SpeedStep, the upgraded Thermal Monitor 2, the Enhanced Halt State C1E and EM64T 64-bit capability.
The Pentium 4 500 series was available at up to 3.8 GHz (model 570) while the 600 series maxed out at 3.6 GHz (Pentium 4 660). Plans to cross the 4 GHz line were discussed, but heat dissipation put an end to that idea, so Intel worked towards getting the first dual core processors ready.
The Pentium 4 600 at 3.0 GHz (which means the P4-630) provided only average performance in SYSmark 2007. This is the main reason why it doesn't do well in the power consumption test, where we look at how much power the systems require to complete a full SYSmark run. Although this system's idle and maximum power requirements are second best, right after those of the Core 2 Duo E6850, the P4-630 system consumed 118 watt-hours and took one hour and 40 minutes. The Core 2 Duo E6850 took 106 watt-hours and finished the same task in one hour and ten minutes!
- Prescott Reworked: The P4 600 Series and Extreme Edition 3.73 GHz
- 3.8 GHz P4 570 and E0 Stepping to End Intel's Performance Crisis
- The P4 560's Heat Can Crash and Kill
- Pentium, Schmentium: Decoding CPU Names
- 925XE Chipset and P4EE 3.46 GHz
- Intel Stakes its Vision of the Future with 775 Launch
- A Sneak Peak at Intel's 65-nm Pentium 4
- Dothan over Netburst: Is the Pentium 4 a Dead End?
We used a Pentium 4 660 and reduced the clock speed to 3.0 GHz for comparison purpose.