6:26 AM - 04/28/2006 by
Patrick Schmid
- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (2) |
- Share
Here you can see what we have mentioned earlier: any 1.8" drive is clearly inferior to any 2.5" model as soon as the system requires large amounts of data. This PCMark05 benchmark shows the average data transfer rate in MB/s when simulating the launch of Windows XP.
The same point is valid for data writes: the more that needs to be written, the more 1.8" hard drives fall behind.
Topics being discussed on the forums
- How to make an ugly woman beautiful? Beer! [Old Man/Woman's Club]
- Recommendation for P&S for my wife please.... [Digital Camera]
- Dang... quiet in here... [Games General]
- 350D / Rebel Digital XT Preview [Digital Camera]
- Scenery for the good life [Games General]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- CPU Lapping - Wet/Dry? And When Is It Enough?
- CRT is blown, buy a LCD or?
- Q6600 more future-proof than E6850?
- So what is your job?
- Advanced Micro Devices May Be Acquired – Analyst
- Best Cases for Water Cooling
- Intel Core2Duo E6750 w/ SLI?
- Q: Mounting Zalman CNPS9700LED to Gigabyte DQ6
- DFI ICFX3200 (RD600) T2R/G Information
- Any benchmarks between 965 & 975 MB?
- New generation extreme deluxe motherboard – MSI X38 Diamond
- ASUS A8N-VM CSM Problems
- 4gb ddr667@4-4-4 vs 4gb ddr800@5-5-5 vs 2gb ddr800@4-4-4
- Selecting a motherboard and chipset for E6600
Popular Searches
Partners
The Games selection
crazy :
Xiao Xiao 7
A great fight scene from the animation movies Xiao Xiao.
|
violent :
Interactive Buddy
Unwind on your interactive buddy: Do anything you want to him, it will earn you money, and you can buy other stuff to torture him with.
|
Ads
Where can i find an enclosure that can read from this HD?
On ebay, for around $10