All about Internal Storage
 Latest Internal Storage articles
All Internal Storage articles

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post

Partners

The Games selection

violent : More Mindless Violence Basic shooting game, but still so powerful! Use the mouse to take aim and shoot at the little beasties before they get to you. Use Space to reload....
action : Yoyo the Star Yoyo is a young girl who recently graduated and dreams to become a movie star (don't we all). You'll have to guide her on the path to stardom,...
Ads

Sponsored links

RAID Creation, Test Setup, And Throughput

Previous Next
2:00 AM - 08/26/2009 by Patrick Schmid and Achim Roos

RAID Creation

Since the two RAID controllers had different capabilities and features, we decided to take different approaches for each.

In the case of the fully-featured MegaRAID 9260-8i, as well as the Adaptec RAID 5805 we used before, we created RAID 0 arrays with eight SSDs on each of the controllers. Then we used Windows Vista’s RAID capabilities to build a software-based RAID 0 array using the two RAID 0 volumes. This way we’d be utilizing eight SSDs on each controller and on each PCI Express 2.0 link.

For the MegaRAID 9210-8i, we found that the easiest (and best-performing) solution was one huge RAID 0 array managed by Windows Vista. So, we went into the Storage Manager and created a software RAID 0 array using all 16 available Intel X25-E flash SSDs.

Test Setup

System Hardware
Hardware
Details
CPU
Intel Core i7-920 (45 nm, 2.66 GHz, 8 MB L2 Cache)
Motherboard (Socket 1366)
Supermicro X8SAX
Revision: 1.0
Chipset Intel X58 + ICH10R
BIOS: 1.0B
RAM
2GB DDR3-1333 Corsair CM3X1024-1333C9DHX
System HDD
Seagate NL35 400 GB
ST3400832NS
7,200 RPM, SATA/150, 8 MB
Controller I
2 x Adaptec RAID 5805
8 Port SAS Controller 512 MB Cache
Controller II
2 x LSI MegaRAID 9210-8i (aka Intel RS2BL080)
8 Port SAS HBA
Controller III
2 x LSI MegaRAID 9260-8i
8 Port SAS Controller 512 MB Cache
Power Supply
OCZ EliteXstream 800W
OCZ800EXS-EU
Benchmarks
I/O Performance
IOMeter 2006.07.27
Fileserver-Benchmark
Webserver-Benchmark
Database-Benchmark
Workstation-Benchmarks
Streaming reads
Streaming Writes.
System Software & Drivers
Driver
Details
Operating System
Windows Vista Ultimate SP1
Intel Chipset
9.1.0.1007
AMD Graphics
Radeon 8.12
Intel Storage Drivers
Matrix Storage Drivers 8.7.0.1007


You will find very detailed information on our storage reference test system in the article Tom’s Storage Charts 2009: A New Test Environment.

Throughput

These are really great results. Both LSI controllers take our RAID arrays, using the 16 Intel X25-E flash SSDs, to a whole new level of throughput as they jump over the 3 GB/s level! The 3,005 MB/s average throughput is excellent for a RAID controller, which typically is better at I/O than at high throughput. LSI’s new 6 Gb/s HBA, the 9210-8i, managed to reach more than 14% better throughput, hitting 3,432 MB/s average read throughput across all drives.

The write throughput wasn’t really different than the read results on the LSI MegaRAID 9210-8i, but the 9260-8i RAID card incurred a slight impact. Still, that’s nothing to worry about—this array on those two controllers is probably faster than anything most of you (or us) have ever seen in the storage arena.

Talkback
Anonymous 08/26/2009 8:54 AM
Hide
-0+

Holy cow, how much for the total damage?

Anonymous 08/26/2009 10:31 AM
Hide
-4+

It would be good to get a benchmark with a Windows XP/Vista/7 showing how long to boot the OS, various games, file copy speed... etc Fair enough these give fast throughput but where are the real world results?

Anonymous 08/26/2009 10:32 AM
Hide
-2+

What about some photos of the raid itself?

amdfangirl 08/26/2009 11:51 AM
Show
climber 08/26/2009 1:28 PM
Hide
-6+

Personally, I would like to see a "Part II" to this article showing RAID 5, 6 and 10 setups with the same tests. No database admin or graphic designer, animator or CAD/CAM/GIS professional is going to use RAID 0 with it's inherent vulnerability, or at least they shouldn't.

amnotanoobie 08/26/2009 1:29 PM
Hide
-0+

facehole :
It would be good to get a benchmark with a Windows XP/Vista/7 showing how long to boot the OS, various games, file copy speed... etc Fair enough these give fast throughput but where are the real world results?



I think with the cost of such a setup these would be ideal for a web or application server, or maybe a small data center. Booting Win 7 would be the least of your problems.

megahunter 08/26/2009 1:56 PM
Show
cah027 08/26/2009 2:46 PM
Hide
-0+

I wonder if this is the type of storage used in super computers or render farms ?

GullLars 08/26/2009 4:03 PM
Hide
--1+

"None of the SSDs currently available support Serial Attached SCSI (SAS) or 600 MB/s transfer speeds"
False: STEC's Zeus IOPs, and BitMicro's E-Disk Altima support SAS (Zeus supports SAS 6 Gbit). Though these cost about 3-5x more pr GB.

ProDigit80 08/26/2009 4:30 PM
Hide
-0+

could it be that the computer's integrated graphics card is also connected to that bus and utilizes some bandwidth?

Another question I had is if you really notice a difference running whatever program on 2,2GB/s or 3,4GB/s? Even slow Vista should fly there.

Anonymous 08/26/2009 4:40 PM
Hide
--1+

Excellent article, thanks

meatwad53186 08/26/2009 5:01 PM
Hide
-6+

I don't know about anyone else, but I would like to see Tom's including more pictures of the hardware actually in the Tom's office, set up, and being used in some of the articles that get posted.

bounty 08/26/2009 5:28 PM
Hide
-0+

So what you need now is for Intel to hook you up with another 6 drives and you can load up the onboard SATA controller, raid 0 that with the others. Or switch platforms to something designed for Quad SLI then really load up on the drives (plus onboard SATA of course.) I say dial up the ridiculous, then see how long it takes to boot/load games. New hobby for the super overclockers, make fastest raid 0 setup.

sseyler 08/26/2009 6:35 PM
Hide
--1+

I'd like to see the actual setup myself, as well..

VioMeTriX 08/26/2009 7:08 PM
Hide
--1+

id love to see this myself as well...

tixarn1 08/26/2009 8:53 PM
Hide
-0+

facehole :
It would be good to get a benchmark with a Windows XP/Vista/7 showing how long to boot the OS, various games, file copy speed... etc Fair enough these give fast throughput but where are the real world results?



As I've said before, it's not all a hardware RAID and thus isn't bootable.

major7up 08/26/2009 9:39 PM
Hide
--1+

I would love to see some high end Mobo's that incororate these new controllers to leave your PCIe slots free. I would bet it would not be cheap but it certainly would be awesome!

Anonymous 08/27/2009 12:17 PM
Hide
-0+

16x Intel X-25 E will set you down approx €10.000

Anonymous 08/27/2009 12:18 PM
Hide
--3+

16x Intel X-25 E will set you down approx €10.000

Anonymous 08/27/2009 12:19 PM
Show

Sponsored links

Related articles

  • CPU: Intel Core i7-920 With a wide pricing spread between the three available LGA-1366 processors, a $2,500 budget limited this system to the least-expensive Core i7-920. There isn’t much to gain from moving to the Core i7-940, although the copper...

  • As already mentioned, we also compared four of the Memoright Flash SSDs in a RAID 0 array. We used four Seagate Savvio 10K.2 drives as well as four Western Digital WD1500 Raptor drives. We regret that we did not yet have access to four VelociRaptor...

  • This is probably the most important page in the benchmark section of this article. Let’s look at the results of the hard drives in a single-disk configuration, as well as two- and four-drive RAID 0. We’ll also compare the performance results with the...