Android's 'Profitless Prosperity' Criticized

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Zak Islam
Contributor

Zak Islam is a freelance writer focusing on security, networking, and general computing. His work also appears at Digital Trends and Tom's Guide. 

  • killerclick
    So, he's criticizing Android because Android devices aren't marked up so high as iOS devices and because Android has so many useful free apps, you hardly ever have to pay for any?

    Hmm... seems to me that the customer wins in this case
    Reply
  • vaughn2k
    "I am no Apple fanboy, but the notion that Samsung is equivalent to Apple is silly -- Apple's app ecosystem and way everything works together makes it a radically better product...and I think that is an objectively true statement." - McNamee

    McNamee is just protecting his investment share in Apple, which is now in decline, and he could'nt sell those share at the moment, the reason he have this story (to delay the downtred further...
    Reply
  • drenyx
    ...Because they are cheaper?

    How about if I don't care for Apple products?
    Reply
  • Yes because Android isn't being sold by Google per unit, so there can't be any profit there even if Android devices sell in truckloads.

    This dude obviously haven't tried an Android device and its host of useful free apps...
    Reply
  • cats_Paw
    Is this a troll? Because it sure looks like one. If i am getting this right, he is saying that if you are not greedy like apple you are stupid?
    *FacePalm*
    Reply
  • Shorter version: "Those meanies are dragging my Apple shares down, waaahhhh!!!"
    Reply
  • adrhellb
    "...Apple's app ecosystem and way everything works together makes it a radically better product...and I think that is an objectively true statement."

    Objectively? Thanks for the laugh. :)
    Reply
  • Someone Somewhere
    And he never notes that google makes it's money from ads/purchases. The more android devices sell, the more people buy stuff or use apps with ads, the more money they make. And there's the nexuses (nexii?), which are sold at cost (roughly), again because they make money from people using them.
    Reply
  • wildkitten
    killerclickSo, he's criticizing Android because Android devices aren't marked up so high as iOS devices and because Android has so many useful free apps, you hardly ever have to pay for any?Hmm... seems to me that the customer wins in this caseNo, what he is saying is Google is in a precarious position. They may have more of the market, but 8 billion in revenue is a fraction of Apple's 73 billion. That gives Apple much more capital to innovate with. He also is pointing out that Google could be in danger of Android becoming associated with another brand name like Samsung rather than being with Google.

    I think he is also right about people not as loyal to Android as Apple fans are to Apple devices. I know a lot of people that use Android phones, and I use one myself, and none of us feel a need to have our next device be an Android. In fact, the fragmentation is making me seriously consider a Windows Phone next year. But the people I know who use an iPhone are dedicated Apple fans. That may be made fun of here, but brand loyalty is a huge thing for a company.
    Reply
  • wildkitten
    Someone SomewhereAnd he never notes that google makes it's money from ads/purchases. The more android devices sell, the more people buy stuff or use apps with ads, the more money they make. And there's the nexuses (nexii?), which are sold at cost (roughly), again because they make money from people using them.
    Earlier in the year, Google said it was generating $8 billion in revenue in 2012 with its mobile ads and sales of Google Play mobile content

    Certainly looks like he noted that.
    Reply