Gigabyte Unveils 100-Series Motherboard Feature List, Teases Z170 G1 Gaming (Updated)

With the launch of Intel-based 100-series motherboards around the corner, Gigabyte unveiled some of the standout features that it will be packing on its motherboards.

Do note that not all of Gigabyte's 100-series boards will come with all of these features. Instead, take the materials below as reference info, to refer to in case you're not quite sure about some upcoming features.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Niels Broekhuijsen
Contributing Writer

Niels Broekhuijsen is a Contributing Writer for Tom's Hardware US. He reviews cases, water cooling and pc builds.

  • josejones
    USB 3.1 only comes with DisplayPort 1.2?

    WTF? Why the old 2009 DisplayPort 1.2 instead of the newer DisplayPort 1.3? I feel gypped already - what's up with that? These boards already have HDMI 2.0 so, why on earth would Gigabyte only support the already old DisplayPort 1.2? Very disappointing. Gigabyte has some essssplaining to do.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DisplayPort#1.2

    Reply
  • expunged
    yes please!
    Reply
  • Larry Litmanen
    G-Connector, love the idea.
    Reply
  • dwatterworth
    I dream of a day when automated assembly such as the newly revealed Asus GPU line will allow you to order a custom motherboard. There is rarely one that has everything you want and nothing you will never use.
    Reply
  • BulkZerker
    Josejones. That's a question you should ask Intel. Not Gigabyte. But then again Intel has a vested interest in not supporting display port so they can hawk their whateverbolt connector.
    Reply
  • RazberyBandit
    The computer industry should have created a standardized version of this so-called G-Connector a very long time ago. It's incredibly long overdue, and should come pre-installed in cases as a single cable with a connector at the end (akin to front Audio and USB cables), not as a motherboard accessory.

    Three PCIe 3.0 x4 M.2 slots with RAID support creates some seriously fast RAID-5 potential, but I feel many (if not most) potential RAID users would actually prefer four slots for RAID-1+0/0+1 configuration support over RAID-5 support.
    Reply
  • josejones
    I've been looking forward to these new Z170 boards and Skylake for a very long time. It's odd they chose to go with the old 2009 DisplayPort 1.2 instead of the newer DisplayPort 1.3.

    Also, another issue right now is that there are no computer cases that provide Front Panel Support For USB 3.1 Type-C and probably won't be until at least 2016 - what's up with that?:

    "Intel will soon be launching Skylake processors and new Z170 chipsets, but they do not support USB 3.1."

    http://www.legitreviews.com/front-panel-support-for-usb-3-1-on-cases-still-months-away_163145
    Reply
  • dwatterworth
    16224080 said:
    I've been looking forward to these new Z170 boards and Skylake for a very long time. It's odd they chose to go with the old 2009 DisplayPort 1.2 instead of the newer DisplayPort 1.3.

    Also, another issue right now is that there are no computer cases that provide Front Panel Support For USB 3.1 Type-C and probably won't be until at least 2016 - what's up with that?:

    "Intel will soon be launching Skylake processors and new Z170 chipsets, but they do not support USB 3.1."

    http://www.legitreviews.com/front-panel-support-for-usb-3-1-on-cases-still-months-away_163145

    I bet you'll see some of the higher end case manufacturers start to offer replacement modules for the front panel USB connectors.

    It would be great from a building aspect to have a unified front panel connector for power, hdd etc. Silly Asus making that impossible with their one off FP connections.
    Reply
  • expunged
    I've been looking forward to these new Z170 boards and Skylake for a very long time. It's odd they chose to go with the old 2009 DisplayPort 1.2 instead of the newer DisplayPort 1.3.

    I will be using the display port off a video card anyways so this does not bother me at all.
    Reply
  • josejones
    dwatterworth, even though the article I posted about Front Panel Support For USB 3.1 Type-C in cases by legitreviews was just published in May, it may already be outdated, so you are likely correct:

    Computex's best trend: USB 3.1 Type-C motherboard ports
    http://www.pcgamer.com/computexs-best-trend-usb-31-type-c-motherboard-ports/

    I think expunged is correct in one sense too - doesn't matter that much about DisplayPort 1.2 vs 1.3 since we will use the DisplayPort from the GPU, however, it will matter to some that cases do not provide Front Panel Support For USB 3.1 Type-C for things other than GPU.

    So, I would like to hear more about the quote above on why Intel's Skylake does not support USB 3.1 or, is that an error? I notice that there is no mention of USB 3.1 at Wiki on Skylake:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skylake_%28microarchitecture%29

    So, again, maybe it doesn't matter but, I'd like to know for sure.
    Reply