Legendary Qualcomm, Apple, and Nuvia alumni form new CPU startup — Nuvacore promises to 'rewrite the rules of silicon'
Nuvacore is "Engineered for Altitude"
Just several months after leaving Qualcomm, distinguished CPU and system architects Gerard Williams, John Bruno, and Ram Srinivasan, who are celebrated for their high-performance processors developed at Apple, Nuvia, and, more recently, Qualcomm, established a new CPU startup — Nuvacore — that promises no less than to 'rewrite the rules of silicon.' The new general-purpose CPU core set to be developed by Nuvacore is projected to excel in all data center AI workloads, and the motto of the new company is 'Engineered for Altitude.'
"For decades, the semiconductor industry has been dominated by an 'old guard,' titans of tech that design for the ground, iterating on yesterday's architecture," a statement by Nuvacore reads. "But as artificial intelligence and core infrastructure demands skyrocket, iteration is no longer enough."
Based on the description on Nuvacore's website, the company is developing a new general-purpose CPU core designed from scratch for data center and AI infrastructure, and the key focus of the all-new design is maximizing performance and area efficiency. The new high-throughput core will be optimized to efficiently sustain long-running, compute-intensive tasks, including always-on workloads such as advanced AI systems and agentic computing. The startup is funded by Sequoia Capital.
One would notice that all modern server CPUs are explicitly designed for 24/7 operation, high utilization, and long-running workloads. Sustained quality-of-service (i.e., performance and latency), reliability, and efficiency under continuous load are compulsory characteristics in the data center. However, Nuvacore positions its upcoming design as one optimized for AI-heavy, continuously saturated environments, not just general-purpose server CPUs.
Whether that translates into something materially different from existing CPUs is an open question, as the statement itself looks more like marketing than a fundamentally new characteristic of a data center processor. Perhaps, the design will be very clean and feature optimizations for working alongside AI accelerators, and/or special features to handle vast amounts of data common for AI systems.
One thing Nuvacore does not disclose is the instruction set architecture of its upcoming CPUs. Arm is certainly among the options, particularly because many hyperscalers use custom Arm-based processors for their emerging AI workloads.
Gerard Williams III is renowned for his high-performance breakthrough 64-bit Arm-based CPU cores for Apple iPhone and iPad, as well as Mac computers spanning from the Cyclone generation in 2013 (Apple A7, iPhone 5S) all the way to the Firestorm generation (M1-series CPUs, A14 application processors). At Apple, Gerard Williams worked closely with John Bruno, who was responsible for system architecture; Ram Srinivasan, a specialist in system-on-chip architecture; and Manu Gulati, who was the lead SoC architect for multiple iPhone and iPad generations from 2009 to 2017.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Having developed multiple generations of successful client platforms, Williams, Bruno, and Gulati founded Nuvia to develop high-performance Arm-based data center-grade CPU cores. Nuvia was acquired by Qualcomm in 2021 with the aim of using its technologies primarily for client applications, though it is highly likely that eventually architectures developed by the ex-Nuvia team will be used for the company's data center products.
Now, Williams, Bruno, and Srinivasan plan to develop an all-new clean-sheet general-purpose CPU design specifically for 'intense, continuous demands of advanced AI systems and agentic computing.' Perhaps it is about time now that most hyperscalers have their own custom silicon programs aimed at developing compute platforms aimed specifically at diverse AI workloads. All of these companies, already investing tens of billions of dollars in their AI infrastructure, will be tremendously interested in getting their hands on a clean-sheet CPU core design better tailored for AI than general-purpose competitors.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.
-
kealii123 Figured GPU architecture is what's going to matter in the future. Who cares about CPUs, what we have on data enters now is fineReply -
ekio What’s good with ARM and RISC-V is that now some engineers from all over the world can start their own adventure and improve things, unlike during the duo(if not mono)poly dark years were the future was exclusively decided between the hand of Blue corpo greed vs Red corpo greed.Reply -
Notton So... judging by how this went last time with Nuvia...Reply
2 years to design something
Get bought out by Qualcomm for $1,300,000,000
3 years to tape out retail chips that are 2~3 gens behind
Best of luck to them. Guessing we'll know their fate by 28'/29', and an actual product by 31'/32' -
alan.campbell99 More AI-focused silicon, doesn't sound too distinguishing to me. I imagine it'll be competing for fab capacity as well.Reply
If the bubble pops they should probably have another use for it lined up. -
bit_user This seems like history repeating itself, since they left Apple and founded Nuvia to build server CPUs. I wonder if this new company will also get bought by someone looking to use it for clients?Reply
: D
No, more like 1 to 1.5 generations behind.Notton said:3 years to tape out retail chips that are 2~3 gens behind -
bit_user Reply
Apparently not, as there's fairly brisk competition among CPU vendors, with Nvidia and ARM now getting into the race.kealii123 said:Who cares about CPUs, what we have on data enters now is fine
In fact, AMD and Intel are doing quite well, mainly because demand for their server CPUs is so strong. -
bit_user Reply
Possibly, but I wouldn't bet on it. Right now, RISC-V has about 0% marketshare, in the cloud. That will change, but it's a big gamble to stake your entire company on roughly when it'll start to gain any meaningful traction.jackt said:will it be riscv ?
The last company which tried that was Ventana, which Qualcomm acquired:
https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/semiconductors/qualcomms-ventana-acquisition-points-to-a-long-term-risc-v-strategy
Not sure if it was a fire sale. Quite possibly, since they have no shipping products (AFAICT), and yet were supposed to have at least their second-gen server CPU out, by now. -
TerryLaze Reply
GPUsbit_user said:In fact, AMD and Intel are doing quite well, mainly because demand for their server CPUs is so strong.
At least there is no way of knowing for sure, either company only divides between client and datacenter, but it's much more probable because of the GPU demand (Instinct and gpu max) ,with server CPU sales probably being around the same as always, if not lower. -
Spuwho Reply
Nuvia reportedly had the tech, but didn't have the funding to go fabrication. So they accepted the Qualcomm stock deal and reversed engineered their work to avoid the ARM license issueNotton said:So... judging by how this went last time with Nuvia...
2 years to design something
Get bought out by Qualcomm for $1,300,000,000
3 years to tape out retail chips that are 2~3 gens behind
Best of luck to them. Guessing we'll know their fate by 28'/29', and an actual product by 31'/32'
Now that Qualcomm has released their work and they are also outside of their non-compete window, they can move on and start Nuvia all over again.