AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D vs Intel Core i7-14700K faceoff — A new battle for DDR4 supremacy in 2026

14700k 5800x3d
(Image credit: Getty Images)
Recent updates

The Ryzen 7 5800X3D is back in stock at Amazon and Best Buy.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Hassam Nasir
Contributing Writer

Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.

With contributions from
  • King_V
    Features and specifications table near the beginning is showing both CPUs as supporting DDR5.

    Should be showing the DDR4 speed supported for the 5800X3D, and probably both the DDR4 speed and DDR5 speed for the 14700K.

    And neither of the existing numbers in that table represent what the Intel chip supports. From the article:
    the Core i7-14700K supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory at 3200 MT/s and 5600 MT/s, respectively.
    Reply
  • rluker5
    I've heard that if you tune the DDR4 on RPL the gaming performance gets very close to stock DDR5 due to the lower latency making up for the lack of bandwidth.
    I believe Toms had no gaming benefit for DDR5 for Alder Lake due to similar reasons.
    Reply
  • JakeRoach
    King_V said:
    Features and specifications table near the beginning is showing both CPUs as supporting DDR5.

    Should be showing the DDR4 speed supported for the 5800X3D, and probably both the DDR4 speed and DDR5 speed for the 14700K.

    And neither of the existing numbers in that table represent what the Intel chip supports. From the article:
    You're 100% correct, sorry for the error! It was left over from a previous faceoff by mistake. I've corrected it.
    Reply
  • Roland Of Gilead
    Mostly, I think the face offs are slightly redundant with some odd matches sometimes. This one is very timely though. These are two strong chips, and do game very well. With the storage/mem/cpu/gpu cost increases these two are still viable options. I've always like the great all-round performance of the 14700k. It's just good at everything. Yes, these CPU's and systems based on them have no more upgrades available, but if the price shock keeps going as it is for another year or tow or more, then there will be a market for them.
    Reply
  • usertests
    Roland Of Gilead said:
    Mostly, I think the face offs are slightly redundant with some odd matches sometimes.
    They are always weird. The Tom's Hardware faceoff quantitative scoring is arbitrary and should be ignored, just consider what's written about it instead.

    It was pretty funny for AMD to announce the $349 5800X3D Anniversary Edition and the faster $329 7700X3D at the same time. Desperate AM4 owners got fleeced.
    Reply
  • Roland Of Gilead
    usertests said:
    Desperate AM4 owners got fleeced.
    Yea, sadly, the need outweighs the means! Hard to find value in anything these days.
    Reply
  • saunupe1911
    Roland Of Gilead said:
    Yea, sadly, the need outweighs the means! Hard to find value in anything these days.
    Still keeping my 5900X and 4090 setup. Waiting to see what Zen6 brings us. Will pickup RAM and Motherboard during Black Friday of this year.
    Reply
  • LordVile
    usertests said:
    They are always weird. The Tom's Hardware faceoff quantitative scoring is arbitrary and should be ignored, just consider what's written about it instead.

    It was pretty funny for AMD to announce the $349 5800X3D Anniversary Edition and the faster $329 7700X3D at the same time. Desperate AM4 owners got fleeced.
    Yes and no because the 5800X3D was going for 500 on the used market and the ram cost for AM5 makes the 5800X3D a good deal if you’re on AM4 already and not on a 5700X3D
    Reply
  • VizzieTheViz
    Are there really people considering getting either one or the other?

    If you’re in AM4 and want a cpu upgrade the 5800X3D is a no-brainer and the i7 14700 is not an option.

    If you’re on the Intel platform (I forget the socket) the same goes for the 14700.

    If you’re building a new system with this pricey a cpu in it I’d say do it for a platform that has an upgrade path and pay a little (okay quite a lot but it’s not like DDR4 is suddenly free) more for DDR5.

    If you’re building a budget system these platforms are still worth a look but a $350+ cpu doesn’t make much sense for a budget system.

    Just my take, I’m curious to hear what you think.
    Reply
  • bit_user
    IMO, the use of DDR-3200 was a little unrealistic. I think most people would tend to run it at least at 3600 MT/s. Also, what CAS latency was used? JEDEC settings, I suppose?
    Reply