We tested supercharging the RTX 5090 in PhysX games using an RTX 5060 as a secondary GPU — SLI may be dead, but how much can dual GPUs boost performance in classic PhysX titles?

RTX 5080 and RTX 3080 Founder's Edition on a desk.
(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Today, we're testing the impact of using a dedicated secondary RTX 5060 GPU to boost the performance of an RTX 5090 in a few classic Batman Arkham titles that support 32-bit PhysX, and with impressive results. Sure, these results aren't going to be broadly applicable to all titles and configurations, or even entirely practical, but we're doing this for science, and we generated some interesting benchmarks to chew over.

Back in 2001, Swiss company NovodeX AG developed a physics simulation engine called NovodeX. Just 3 years later, NovodeX AG was acquired by Ageia, a fabless semiconductor company, which began development on hardware-accelerated physics technology. Ageia called this technology PhysX.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Dan Mateescu
Contributor

Dan Mateescu is a PC enthusiast with many years of experience benchmarking PC hardware. In 2021, he started his own YouTube channel called 'Compusemble' where he benchmarks hardware in video games and the latest tech demos.

  • VizzieTheViz
    To me this seems like the games were already running fine without the extra gpu (as well they should on such a pc).

    I doubt you’d really notice the difference when playing instead of benchmarking. Plus it seems a bit much to ask to install an extra gpu just for getting proper physics in some older games.
    Reply
  • aberkae
    Great article. The 0.1 % lows are still on average similar. Also how much power is used from both graphics cards for an experience that is already playable on one gpu. It's not like it's a multi player games where fps and latency matters more. The minimum threshold of subjectively being playable is probably already achieved with the one 5090. Also the state of graphics cards now even at the bottom is still expensive. Around $300 for a 5050 and slightly more for a 5060 as well as requiring a 1200 watt psu minimum if not higher for both of these.
    I would be nice if we would have an ray tracing dedicated card though imo lol.
    Reply
  • salgado18
    Nvidia has the most market share by a huge margin. And that's with nobody buiyng a second gpu, let alone buying a game just because of Physx. I believe that if Physx were made to run in any GPU, there would be tons of games using it, and many people would buy a smaller second gpu to run them. And Nvidia would still be top seller, but now with even more revenue. I really don't like this exclusive tech stuff.
    Reply
  • salgado18
    VizzieTheViz said:
    To me this seems like the games were already running fine without the extra gpu (as well they should on such a pc).

    I doubt you’d really notice the difference when playing instead of benchmarking. Plus it seems a bit much to ask to install an extra gpu just for getting proper physics in some older games.
    From what I've heard when Asylum lauched, it's one tech that really stands out. Flying rubbish on the streets feel more alive, smoke is not made of transparent speites but is a real mass of gas, clothing behaves fantastic, etc. And you could fit a cheap used GPU as secondary.

    We don't actually see much benefit because, since it only works on Nvidia, game devs only use it as optional visual upgrades. Were it to run on Radeons, a lot more games would use it, and then it would be a significant upgrade.
    Reply
  • VizzieTheViz
    salgado18 said:
    From what I've heard when Asylum lauched, it's one tech that really stands out. Flying rubbish on the streets feel more alive, smoke is not made of transparent speites but is a real mass of gas, clothing behaves fantastic, etc. And you could fit a cheap used GPU as secondary.

    We don't actually see much benefit because, since it only works on Nvidia, game devs only use it as optional visual upgrades. Were it to run on Radeons, a lot more games would use it, and then it would be a significant upgrade.
    Not disagreeing but I’m merely saying it already ran fine WITH physics on the 5090 alone. So why bother with an extra GPU if you already have a system fast enough to run these games on 4K resolution with physics enabled?
    Reply
  • ooby doob
    I had an RTX 3050 + 5080 but since they added physx support for the 50-series I took the 3050 out of my system. Every physx title I've tried runs perfectly fine with just the 5080. The 3050 doesn't really make a big difference (only 5-10 fps improvement), and in some cases as with 1% lows it's worse.
    Reply
  • welshbloke
    salgado18 said:
    From what I've heard when Asylum lauched, it's one tech that really stands out. Flying rubbish on the streets feel more alive, smoke is not made of transparent speites but is a real mass of gas, clothing behaves fantastic, etc. And you could fit a cheap used GPU as secondary.

    We don't actually see much benefit because, since it only works on Nvidia, game devs only use it as optional visual upgrades. Were it to run on Radeons, a lot more games would use it, and then it would be a significant upgrade.
    A 17 year old game running on a modern $3500 gpu is probably not the selling point for PhysX that you think it is tbh.
    Reply
  • rluker5
    I used to use a gt730 pciex1 for PhysX when I ran SLI and it was plenty.
    Author should have tried a card that wasn't already faster than anything that existed at the time these games were released for PhysX.
    Reply
  • salgado18
    ooby doob said:
    I had an RTX 3050 + 5080 but since they added physx support for the 50-series I took the 3050 out of my system. Every physx title I've tried runs perfectly fine with just the 5080. The 3050 doesn't really make a big difference (only 5-10 fps improvement), and in some cases as with 1% lows it's worse
    Which recent games did you play, and which ones implement extensive Physx effects? Arkham Knight is rather old by now, and runs fine on almost any GPU. Are there good uses of physics effects in modern games? Enough to make a second gpu something to consider? I guess not, which makes this whole 5090 test pointless.

    Sorry about the rant, but PhysX is one tech I really wanted to see being used everywhere as a feature, and not just some gimmick that Geforce users can activate as a bonus.
    Reply
  • Roland Of Gilead
    Good article.

    Adding a couple of other GPU/GPU configs would be enlightening.

    I tried this a few years back with a RTX 3060ti/GTX 1060 6gb. It worked as intended. However, although good for the aforementioned games, I got bored of it and sold the GTX.

    During gaming, the GTX1060 never had ore than 40% usage, and power draw was very low.
    Reply