Trending

AMD Phenom II X6 1090T And 890FX Platform Review: Hello, Leo

By

Benchmark Results: Productivity

Phenom II X6 1090T gets a big boost in our Photoshop CS4 test, but it’s only enough to pass Intel’s Core i5-750. The rest of the Bloomfield parts are still faster and Gulftown holds a more significant advantage. Nevertheless, compared to Phenom II X4 965, the six-core processor represents a massive speed-up.

I know I promised that AVG would disappear in my Core i7-980X review, but it’s making one final showing here, since my Kaspersky test isn’t ready yet. The results are unsurprising.

Threading optimizations in 3ds Max help the Phenom II X6 1090T shoot ahead of Intel’s Core i7-930, -920, and Core i5-750, while the Phenom II X4 965 trails in last place.

Five Intel processors dominate here, though threading clearly gives the X6 an advantage over AMD’s previous flagship.

Speed-ups in 7-Zip place AMD’s hexa-core CPU just behind Intel’s quad-core Core i7-975 Extreme Edition. The significance here, of course, is that the Phenom II X6 1090T beats out Intel’s Core i7-930—a slightly more expensive processor.

231 Comments Comment from the forums
  • theDARKW0LF 27 April 2010 11:04
    Awesome, good thing I waited for this release, hello six cores (first post)!
    Reply
  • dwave 27 April 2010 11:12
    My 4 core Core2Quad @ 2.83 is still working everything great, so I won't be upgrading. Nice to see the price for 6 cores is very reasonable though!
    Reply
  • 27 April 2010 11:16
    This maaayy just be my "conspiracy theory" but please also test nvidia cards with the processors. Not flacking AMD or anything but there could possibly be optimizations and "reverse optimizations" for the processors.

    I just cant remember tom's last review that had an nvidia card with an AMD processor.
    Reply
  • theDARKW0LF 27 April 2010 11:16
    Lol I was just into the hype at that last post, I didn't even start to read the review, now I think I'll just go back to the Phenom II X4, ah well lol
    Reply
  • 27 April 2010 11:16
    Finally this article comes out. I've been waiting since the morning for this. Lol but anyway, good read.
    Reply
  • cangelini 27 April 2010 11:17
    Got some GTX 480 numbers in there as well txt, and the results weren't much prettier.
    Reply
  • englandr753 27 April 2010 11:18
    Being that I have seemed to changed my use of my pc more toward video editing than gaming I am definitely selling off my Q9550 and going with the AMD X6. I still game some but don't care to have the cutting edge video card atm so this is perfect for me. I'm buying from AMD for my next cpu! Way to go AMD! I still have another Q9550 system so don't think I'm an AMD fan boy but I do love it when AMD gives such a great value for such a great product. Everyone should...
    Reply
  • 27 April 2010 11:23
    You know, AMD can make a 48core CPU, but if it performs worse than Intel's 4 core, than it does not matter that it costs only as much as Intel's 4 core.

    In this case, it does not perform better than i7-920, even though the 920 is a 4 core cpu (and no, no one really runs it at 2.66, everyone pushes it at least to 3, since it takes nothing to get it to that speed, and it right away outperforms AMD's 6 core, and has a much better memory throughput).
    Reply
  • englandr753 27 April 2010 11:26
    Is the X6 1090T not oc'able at all? It would seem there should be some headroom for overclock to some degree. Starting out at 3.2g makes me think you should be able to get fairly close to 4.0.
    Reply
  • cangelini 27 April 2010 11:31
    englandr753Is the X6 1090T not oc'able at all? It would seem there should be some headroom for overclock to some degree. Starting out at 3.2g makes me think you should be able to get fairly close to 4.0.
    I was able to hit 3.7 with Turbo CORE enabled fairly easily. It might go higher, but I'd argue this probably isn't as much of an overclocking chip as a 965 might be.
    Reply