The GeForce GTX 480 Update: 3-Way SLI, 3D Vision, And Noise
We reviewed Nvidia's GeForce GTX 480 one month ago. We're back today with three GTX 480s and two Radeon HD 5870s for SLI/CrossFire scaling analysis, case and motherboard recommendations to help you minimize noise, and an update on availability/pricing.
Picking The Right Motherboard
Generally speaking, it should be “enough” to buy an SLI-capable motherboard and expect your dual-card array to work. That’s technically true, but when it comes to the GeForce GTX 480, there’s a right way to go about picking a platform.
You want a board equipped with two second-gen PCI Express x16 slots that are electrically wired to run at x16, and not x8. Moreover, you want them to be at least three slots apart, leaving at least one space between the top and bottom cards. Anything less and you’ll sacrifice frame rate and/or acoustic performance.
Fortunately, there are quite a few boards with ample spacing. Some of these include:
Motherboards With Ample Spacing For SLI | ||
---|---|---|
Row 0 - Cell 0 | X58 Express | P55 Express |
Asus | P6T Deluxe | Maximus III Extreme |
Row 2 - Cell 0 | P6T Deluxe V2 | Maximus III Formula |
Row 3 - Cell 0 | P6T Deluxe w/ OC Palm | P7P55 WS SuperComputer |
Row 4 - Cell 0 | P6T WS Professional | P7P55D Deluxe |
Row 5 - Cell 0 | P6T6 WS Revolution | P7P55D EVO |
Row 6 - Cell 0 | P6T7 WS SuperComputer | P7P55D Premium |
Row 7 - Cell 0 | P6TD Deluxe | P7P55D Pro |
Row 8 - Cell 0 | Row 8 - Cell 1 | P7P55D-E Deluxe |
Row 9 - Cell 0 | Row 9 - Cell 1 | P7P55D-E EVO |
Row 10 - Cell 0 | Row 10 - Cell 1 | P7P55D-E Premium |
Row 11 - Cell 0 | Row 11 - Cell 1 | P7P55D-E Pro |
Row 12 - Cell 0 | Row 12 - Cell 1 | SABERTOOTH 55i |
EVGA | X58 Classified 4-Way SLI | P55 Classified 200 |
Row 14 - Cell 0 | X58 SLI Classified | P55 FTW 200 |
Row 15 - Cell 0 | X58 SLI | Row 15 - Cell 2 |
Gigabyte | Row 16 - Cell 1 | P55A-UD4P |
Row 17 - Cell 0 | Row 17 - Cell 1 | P55A-UD6 |
Row 18 - Cell 0 | Row 18 - Cell 1 | P55A-UD7 |
Row 19 - Cell 0 | Row 19 - Cell 1 | P55-UD4P |
Row 20 - Cell 0 | Row 20 - Cell 1 | P55-UD5 |
Row 21 - Cell 0 | Row 21 - Cell 1 | P55-UD6 |
MSI | Eclipse Plus | Big Bang Trinergy |
Row 23 - Cell 0 | X58 Platinum | P55-GD80 |
Row 24 - Cell 0 | Eclipse SLI | P55-GD65 |
Row 25 - Cell 0 | X58 Platinum SLI | P55-GD85 |
Now, obviously the P55-based boards are going to give up some performance, as integrated PCI Express connectivity on LGA 1156-based CPUs gets divided into a pair of x8 links. But if you're going with an X58 board (and if you're spending more than a grand on graphics, I'm willing to bet you're also running an LGA 1366-based processor), double-check your platform of choice, ensuring the properly-spaced slots are both of the 16-lane sort.
Again, we’re using MSI’s Eclipse Plus, which comes armed with an NF200 bridge chip, capable of multiplexing the chipset’s connectivity into a trio of x16 slots for our three GTX 480s. Special thanks to MSI for also supplying that third card.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Picking The Right Motherboard
Prev Page Closing The Case On Noise Next Page Test Hardware And Software-
anonymous x Why don't you overclock that cpu higher? Only 3.3 Ghz? The 3rd GTX 480 looks like it's being bottlenecked. You can see the scaling is excellent at high resolutions with AA (from 1 to 2 to 3 cards), but at lower resolutions without AA there's no gain.Reply -
lashton and why not check it against the 5890, the 480GTX is nvidia fastest card, put it against ATI Fastest CardReply -
cangelini There's a good chance that more CPU would def. help at the lower resolutions--one of the reasons I chose 2560 for the comparisons at the end ;-) For one reason or another, wasn't having much luck getting the retail i7-930/Eclipse Plus combo to overclock very well.Reply -
cangelini lashtonand why not check it against the 5890, the 480GTX is nvidia fastest card, put it against ATI Fastest CardReply
A pair of 5870s is actually going to be faster. Should I swing a second 5970, though, I do think a pair of 5970s vs. the three GTX 480s would be a good comparison! -
lunyone Did I miss something, but there is NO mention of the power consumption of the 3 x 480's??Reply -
I have no clue where you people are getting this "5890" Statement from... They have the 5870, and then the next step up is the 5970... Is that what you're trying to say?Reply
-
cangelini stuk1intI have no clue where you people are getting this "5890" Statement from... They have the 5870, and then the next step up is the 5970... Is that what you're trying to say?Reply
Bleh, it's late and it has been a long weekend. Edited :) -
SpadeM Quad fire with 5850 would have been nice (thinking back to a builder marathon with quad fire) to see if ati's quad cards made any improovement over last years ones. Also i agree with lunyone, I for one would have been interested to see the numbers on load for the 3 nvidia cards with the 800W gold power supply (and maybe a comment from you cris about what power supply u think is best for the job. Either go lower wattage but a high efficiency psu or higher wattage but lower efficiency)Reply
Anyways, it was a informative article, looking forward to a full 512 sp card from nvidia and the second revision to the fermi core. -
JeanLuc stuk1intI have no clue where you people are getting this "5890" Statement from... They have the 5870, and then the next step up is the 5970... Is that what you're trying to say?Reply
The only place where the "5890" exists is in ATI's folder under 'What to do if Fermi is good".
And yes where is the tri-sli power consumption numbers, there's no mention of it's omittance in the analysis.