Trending

OCZ’s RevoDrive X2: When A Fast PCIe SSD Isn’t Fast Enough

By

In a storage market where it's easiest to take one vendor's controller, another vendor's NAND flash, and put the two in a standard 2.5" SATA drive, OCZ continues innovating, giving IT professionals and power users more performance with its RevoDrive X2.

Benchmark Results: Iometer Streaming

Our Iometer streaming reads test measures sequential performance. As expected, the similarly-configured RevoDrive X2 and IBIS put down comparable results, outpacing the dual-controller RevoDrive by a significant margin, and the single-controller Vertex 2 and X25-M drives by even more.

The SandForce-based drives deliver remarkable sequential write performance compared to the Intel competition. Once again, we see the two 240 GB quad-controller SSDs deliver similar numbers, followed by the 120 GB RevoDrive and the 120 GB Vertex 2.

Topics
Intel
OCZ
Storage
47 Comments Comment from the forums
  • joelmartinez 12 January 2011 11:19
    Too much money :( will get the vertex 3 though :) or intel
    Reply
  • alikum 12 January 2011 11:38
    If only they could make SSDs cheaper ... Mechanical drives are still the way to go
    Reply
  • eklipz330 12 January 2011 11:50
    although i think sandforce's new controller won't be as fast as they claim, i really think it's gonna change the face of the ssd race by the end of the year

    and probably a new iteration of the revodrive as well... can't wait!! =D =D i need me a 160gb for less than $1/gb... that's how much i bought my raptor for like 4 years ago!!
    Reply
  • dauthus 12 January 2011 12:00
    In related news, OCZ stock is up to $6.80 a share, rising 19%+ today.
    Reply
  • 12 January 2011 12:10
    How does this compare to the new Z-drive R3?
    Reply
  • cmi86 12 January 2011 12:32
    Yeah its really cool and i wish i had 1...or 2 lol but it just costs waay too much money, isnt really practical for enthusiast use until the prices drop
    Reply
  • dirtmountain 12 January 2011 13:12
    You routinely use $500 graphic cards (GTX580) and $1,200 displays (2560x1600)in reviews. The price for this upgrade ($650)isn't any harder to stomach then those.
    Reply
  • cangelini 12 January 2011 13:26
    dirtmountainYou routinely use $500 graphic cards (GTX580) and $1,200 displays (2560x1600)in reviews. The price for this upgrade ($650)isn't any harder to stomach then those.
    Aye, but it's a little less tangible than exotic graphics configurations, too.
    Reply
  • razor512 12 January 2011 13:38
    a pci-e ssd seems good, I want one, MS word will run sooo much better
    Reply
  • alidan 12 January 2011 14:14
    i realy wish they would put a 7200 10000 and 15000 drive in there, all top of their respective class, just so we can get some prospective of how much an improvement these are over traditional hdds.
    Reply