System Builder Marathon: $625 Gaming PC
Benchmark Results: Productivity
Applications
Our overclocking efforts shave almost 30 seconds off the time needed to render one 1080p frame in 3ds Max.
The overclocked January/February PC once again just edges out last month's efforts when applying filters in Photoshop.
CPU overclocking doesn’t yield huge gains in AVG scans, but we still see the same ranking by clock speeds seen throughout our other applications and encoding tests.
We get strange results in WinRAR file compression as both our November and January/February Pentium E5200 systems had a much higher reduction of time when overclocked than the two seconds difference seen last month.
We finish off our application suite with WinZip file compression where the December PC is able to finally post a one second overclocked victory.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Current page: Benchmark Results: Productivity
Prev Page Benchmark Results: Audio/Video Encoding Next Page Benchmark Results: Synthetics-
xx12amanxx Yeah Games are definatly more GPU bound than CPU bound at this time.But what about the user who decodes? Next month might be a good time to intro the new am3 triple core seeing as its being sodl for around 150$ and has been seen Oced up to 1ghz over stock.Reply -
As I read this review I wonder, why this is only server I know that provides such a throughout testing and evaluation of OC benefit...Reply
*THUMBS UP* -
nerrawg Nice article guys, like how you seem squeeze the value out of the builds, definitely a good choice of build! My only question is one of personal interest, I wonder if disregarding the set price of $625, a crossfire set up of 2 4830s would give more bang for the buck in gaming then 1 4870? Of course as you have shown it would depend on the cpu, I was thinking around 4 Ghz on a dual core and 4 gigs ram. I am wondering because 2 x 4830 can be had for as little as $170-180 now, and thats pretty awesome.Reply -
nerrawg Looking at the "Radeon HD 4830: High-Speed, Cheap CrossFire" article the results look fairly similar to that seen from this build, with maybe some very small gains in Supreme commander and crysis, while World in Conflict appears to due better on this newer january build. However the 4830 CF was on a test bed without an OC'ed cpu and without overclocking the 4830's, hence my curiosity to know if doing this would significantly increase performance and value over the single 4870?Reply -
StupidRabbit great article as always.. but what happened to the international builder marathon?Reply -
jv_acabal $43 difference bang for the buck. How about in the long run? Sure you'll be paying more than 43 bucks for the electricity bill. I think January's build is better. It might be slower than this month's build but is still very playable at most games.Reply -
maxwellsmart_80 Why do you keep building the same system (practically) over and over again?Reply
It would have been awesome to see a system based on the Phenom II X3 "700 Series" at this price point....especially paired w/ the ATI 4830 or 4850. Dont'cha think a 4870 is a tad much for a "$625 system?" - you would have had a "Dragon Platform" - very doable at your price range. You wouldn't have had to do DDR3 either - DDR2 would have worked quite nicely. -
cangelini StupidRabbitgreat article as always.. but what happened to the international builder marathon?Reply
International competition is in edits--almost ready to go live! Interesting results there, too. -
Onus Excellent article. I think this was a good build.Reply
That Rosewill case (and all their cheap ones like it) will take a front mounted 120mm fan. You had $6 left over, so it would have fit in your budget. -
jcknouse THG Staff note:Here are links to each of the four articles in this month’s System Builder Marathon...Reply
I hate being picky...but...
The links aren't imbedded in those 4 article designations at the top of the article, as of the writing of this note.