Page 2:Quadro FX 4800 Hardware Details
Page 3:Software Driver Features
Page 4:Test Configuration
Page 5:Benchmark Results: Maya
Page 6:Benchmark Results: 3ds Max
Page 7:Benchmark Results: Solidworks
Page 8:Benchmark Results: Viewperf I
Page 9:Benchmark Results: Viewperf II
Page 10:Performance Gaming Vs. Workstation: GeForce GTX 280 And Quadro FX 4800
Page 11:Conclusion: Editor's Recommendation
Conclusion: Editor's Recommendation
The card's higher price compared to the FirePro V8700 is something to consider. However, the Quadro FX 4800's performance benchmark results are convincing, besting those of the V8700 in 10 out of 14 tests. Likewise, power consumption and quieter operation also fall in the FX 4800's favor. For these reasons, we bestow the Nvidia Quadro FX 4800 with our Editor's Choice designation.
The official manufacturer suggested retail price for the FX 4800 is $1,999. A bit of careful shopping online, however, soon reveals models from PNY available for well under $1,600. While expensive, we find these prices for workstation cards acceptable, particularly for users in need of extreme performance, 30-bit color, and CUDA support. There's even a big brother to this card available, the Quadro FX 5800. But at a price that's just over double that of the FX 4800, that toll is likely to restrict its purchase to a much smaller audience. And in fact, it's not entirely clear that the price increase is offset by an equal performance increase. It's likely that only a portion of that difference is made up on the performance front.
Those inclined to spend less on a workstation card than this Quadro FX 4800 model costs might want to check out our article on the FirePro V8700. This ATI card lags only slightly behind the Quadro FX 4800 in most of our benchmarks. At a street price of around $1,250, it makes an attractive alternative to the Quadro FX 4800 for those on a budget.
A final observation: The Quadro FX 4800 and Quadro FX 5800 have been joined by other members of this product family. On March 30, Nvidia announced this new lineup, as described in the following table. The entries in the "previous model" column will be replaced by those in the "newest model" column.
|Previous model||Newest Model||Product positioning|
|Nvidia Quadro FX 5600||Nvidia Quadro FX 5800||Ultra High-End with Maximal Performance|
|Nvidia Quadro FX 4600||Nvidia Quadro FX 4800||Ultra High-End for Professionals|
|Nvidia Quadro FX 3700||Nvidia Quadro FX 3800||High-End|
|Nvidia Quadro FX 1700||Nvidia Quadro FX 1800||Mid-Range|
|Nvidia Quadro FX 570||Nvidia Quadro FX 580||Entry-Level Productivity|
|Nvidia Quadro FX 370||Nvidia Quadro FX 380||Entry-Level Budget Offering|
There's another model also available: it's called the NVS 295 (but it is geared for business and not workstation graphics, so we omit further discussion here). You can find more news on this general subject here: Nvidia Announces Quadro FX 3450/4500 Workstation Graphics Chips.
- Quadro FX 4800 Hardware Details
- Software Driver Features
- Test Configuration
- Benchmark Results: Maya
- Benchmark Results: 3ds Max
- Benchmark Results: Solidworks
- Benchmark Results: Viewperf I
- Benchmark Results: Viewperf II
- Performance Gaming Vs. Workstation: GeForce GTX 280 And Quadro FX 4800
- Conclusion: Editor's Recommendation