Indianapolis politician's home shot at 13 times over data center dispute — police and FBI investigating 'isolated, targeted incident' after city councilor backed project

A "No data center" sign
(Image credit: Getty Images)

The home of Indianapolis City-County Council member Ron Gibson was shot at on Monday, with the assailant leaving a note saying, “NO DATA CENTERS.” Many people have recently been vehemently opposing the construction of data centers, especially as many are concerned about the negative effects it has on the community. These include increased electricity costs and diminished power quality, as well as apprehension about its effect on the water supply. According to CBS News, Gibson supported the proposed Metrobloks data center, but was met with boos when he spoke up about the benefits of the project during a Metropolitan Development Commission meeting last week.

“There are real benefits tied to this development,” Gibson said during the public hearing. “Construction is expected to support roughly 300 jobs over a three-year period.” However, the members of the public who opposed the project were asked to stand up; most of the people in the meeting were seen taking a stand. Despite this, the Metropolitan Development Commission approved the proposed rezoning to accommodate the planned data center. This is not a done deal yet, though, as the proposal still needs approval from the Indianapolis City-County Council, of which Gibson is a member.

Article continues below

This isn’t the first time members of a community have pushed back against proposed data centers. It has gotten to the point that one company kept the location of its latest data center project secret, explaining that it wanted to spare the small towns from “national media attention.” However, it can get difficult to fight against these AI infrastructure projects, especially as tech companies are willing to pay a premium to get their sites up and running, with one unnamed company offering more than 7 times the average rate in the area for a parcel of land where they intend to build a data center. A farming family in Northern Kentucky declined the $26 million that the tech firm dangled in front of them. Unfortunately, their other neighbors said yes, so plans for an AI data center in the region are still underway.

What’s worrying, though, is that this is the first report of a data center dispute turning violent. Political discussions like this can become heated, especially as people worry that their homes and future are on the line. But even Protect Martindale-Brightwood, one of the neighborhood groups that is against the project, condemned the attack. “Violence has no place in our community or our advocacy,” said the group. “We want to be clear: any signage or messaging at the scene is not affiliated with our organization and does not reflect who we are. Our work is rooted in peaceful, community-led advocacy grounded in respect and accountability.”

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Jowi Morales
Contributing Writer

Jowi Morales is a tech enthusiast with years of experience working in the industry. He’s been writing with several tech publications since 2021, where he’s been interested in tech hardware and consumer electronics.

  • Gururu
    If I had to choose between an ICE facility and a data center, I'd probably choose a Smoothie King.
    Reply
  • RoLleRKoaSTeR
    In the words from FARK -

    A really lazy attempt at a false flag
    Reply
  • Findecanor
    People don't perform threats like this against someone if they did not consider building the data centre to be the bigger crime.
    Reply
  • S58_is_the_goat
    Lol bravo, threatening someone in power with his life, they should do this more often.
    Reply
  • Spuwho
    The stripping of the small town industrial base over the past 50 years has made politicians desperate for *any* kind of tax generation, even if the impacts locally can be negative over the long term. The building of these DC's with power and water use subsidized by the general ratepayer needs to be examined closely in economic terms. Do the locals have to provide more in rate subsidy than what the DC provides in tax benefit? Once the DC is built, most of it is run remotely and requires very few people to maintain. And those people probably wont live locally.
    This isnt a random case of NIMBYism, but is a general response to the appearance of wealth shifting.
    Reply
  • Rand0m_Guy
    I said in the last Data Center article, the logistics hurdles like power and stuff are secondary to the public. People really really do not want these things in their backyard.
    Reply
  • Findecanor
    When data centres are too large to be powered from the power grid, they get powered by new power plants: often gas turbines running on fossil fuels.
    This causes pollution, not just to the climate, but more directly in a perceivable decrease in air quality and increases in lung cancer cases in the community around those data centres.
    At the same time, utility bills in the area increase.

    That has happened a few times already. Of course people don't want that to happen to their neighbourhoods too.

    Add to that the increasing sentiment against AI in general.
    Reply
  • Notton
    "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." -JFK
    Reply
  • Spuwho
    Notton said:
    "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." -JFK
    Dependent on what exactly the revolution is.
    Reply
  • blppt
    Not just "big business buds GOP". This guy is a Dem. Time for both parties to go.
    Reply