Japan is deploying ultra-cheap cardboard drones built for swarm warfare and expendable combat missions — $2,000 expendable combat drones cost less than some gaming PCs
$2000 drones vs. millions of dollars worth of military equipment
Japan’s Minister of Defense, Shinjirō Koizumi, said in a post on X on Monday that the country had begun using expendable cardboard drones developed by Japanese drone manufacturer AirKamuy. Speaking during a meeting with the startup, the minister confirmed that the Japan Maritime Self-Defense Force was already utilizing the company’s low-cost drones as aerial targets as Japan expands its use of unmanned systems across its military.
The drone, known as the AirKamuy 150, is a lightweight fixed-wing platform built primarily from corrugated cardboard with a water-resistant coating. Unlike conventional military drones that rely on expensive composite materials and specialized aerospace manufacturing, the AirKamuy 150 is designed around extreme affordability and mass production.
今日は段ボール製ドローンで有名なエアカムイの皆さんと意見交換をさせて頂きました。海上自衛隊では既に標的として活用しています。ドローンをはじめとする無人アセットを世界で最も駆使する自衛隊を目指す上で、防衛分野に意欲あるスタートアップの皆さんと連携強化は不可欠です。今日は非常に濃密な… pic.twitter.com/OJwVOpFiBTApril 27, 2026
Perhaps, the drone’s most important feature is its cost. The AirKamuy 150 reportedly costs around $2,000 to $2,500 per unit. By military standards, that is extremely low. Conventional military reconnaissance and loitering drones can cost anywhere from tens of thousands to millions of dollars, depending on their role and sophistication. Even Iran’s Shahed drones, which became heavily associated with the rise of low-cost attritional drone warfare during the Russian invasion of Ukraine, are estimated to cost roughly $20,000 to $50,000 each — potentially more than ten times the cost of the AirKamuy drone.
AirKamuy appears to have achieved part of its extreme cost reduction by radically simplifying the drone’s construction. The company’s use of corrugated cardboard rather than relying heavily on expensive aerospace composites or carbon-fiber airframes is a major factor. According to the company, the approach could allow the drones to be manufactured using ordinary cardboard production infrastructure rather than specialized aerospace facilities, potentially enabling rapid mass production during conflict.
The drone can reportedly travel roughly 50 miles or remain airborne for around 80 minutes using an electric propulsion system while carrying payloads weighing up to three pounds. The company also says the drones, which are prefab and can be assembled in five to ten minutes, are shipped flat-packed, allowing roughly 500 units to fit inside a standard shipping container.
Speaking to the Royal Aeronautical Society at the Singapore Airshow earlier this year, AirKamuy Chief Engineer Naoki Morita said the platform was primarily envisioned as a counter-drone system capable of operating in large numbers. Beyond functioning as aerial targets, the lightweight drones could potentially be deployed in swarms to overwhelm air-defense systems, force enemy radar activation, absorb defensive fire ahead of more valuable assets, or carry small reconnaissance payloads, electronic warfare equipment, or limited munitions for one-way attack missions.
“There is strong demand for low-cost drones that can operate in large numbers and over long distances,” said AirKamuy CEO Yamaguchi Takumi in an interview with NHK World-Japan. “This model can be manufactured at any cardboard plant, ensuring high mass production capability and a robust supply chain.”
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
The cardboard construction may also provide another advantage. Because cardboard has lower radar reflectivity than many conventional aerospace materials, the drones could present a smaller radar signature under certain conditions. While that would not make them invisible to radar systems, reduced detectability could make tracking more difficult, particularly for small, low-flying drones operating in large numbers.
The broader concept behind the AirKamuy 150 reflects a growing shift in military thinking toward low-cost expendable autonomous systems designed to operate in large numbers. Rather than protecting a small number of extremely expensive platforms, militaries are increasingly experimenting with cheap drones that can be sacrificed during reconnaissance, decoy, interception, or attack missions.
Recent conflicts are reflecting that shift. In Ukraine, both Russian and Ukrainian forces have used large numbers of low-cost drones for reconnaissance and direct attacks. Similar tactics involving inexpensive unmanned systems have also appeared across conflicts in the Middle East.
The AirKamuy 150 may ultimately represent more than an unusual cardboard aircraft. It may instead offer a glimpse into the future of industrial-scale drone warfare — one increasingly defined not by a handful of expensive machines, but by vast numbers of cheap, rapidly replaceable autonomous systems.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Etiido Uko is a news contributor for Tom's Hardware covering the latest updates in big tech and the PC industry. He is a mechanical engineer and senior technical writer with over nine years of experience in documentation and reporting. He is deeply passionate about all things engineering and technology, and is an expert in gadgets, manufacturing, robotics, automotive, and aerospace.
-
usertests This has got me wondering how cheaply the electronics can be made. I think very basic chips and sensors have been made with inkjet printing.Reply -
eldakka1 Nice, though a little late to the party. Cardboard drones have been used in the Ukraine war since it began in 2022, so nothing really new here.Reply
Ukraine's $3.5K 'Cardboard' Drone Is a New Weapon Against Russia ...Ukraine Is Using Cardboard Drones From Australia: Details -
bit_user From the inventors of origami, I'm a little disappointed at how conventional it looks. I guess it's a little hard to beat such a tried-and-tested design, though.Reply
I hope they do cardboard crab robots, next. -
bolweval Next, LEGO drones!Reply
https://robot-academy.com/product/robot-academy-lego-drone/
125 bucks! -
bit_user Reply
Neat, but so much about that is locked-down. You can't add more rotors or even change the arrangement of its existing rotors. It also has a max payload of just 120 grams, which limits how much customization you can do and what sorts of things you can use it for.bolweval said:Next, LEGO drones!
https://robot-academy.com/product/robot-academy-lego-drone/
125 bucks!
Also, it's remote-controlled, whereas it'd be really neat if it had some sort of option for autonomous control.
In true Lego spirit, you should be able to do all of those things, as well as change the kind of motor, the battery pack, and the kind of propeller. Without any of that stuff, I'd agree that it deserves an age rating 8+. Much older kids would quickly find it too limiting, I'd hope. -
Mindstab Thrull All I can think of now is Japan using them to Zerg rush opposing drones etc...Reply -
USAFRet Being made from cardboard is irrelevant.Reply
Plastic could be just as cheap.
The payload and range for this is the question. -
bit_user Reply
The article says:USAFRet said:Being made from cardboard is irrelevant.
Plastic could be just as cheap.
"The company also says the drones, which are prefab and can be assembled in five to ten minutes, are shipped flat-packed, allowing roughly 500 units to fit inside a standard shipping container."
How do you suppose plastic would compare, on that front?
In a pinch, maybe you could even just use some generic cardboard stock that's found on-site or acquired nearby. Might not work as well, but could be good enough for some purposes. -
USAFRet Reply
Yeah, the flatpack is a benefit.bit_user said:The article says:
"The company also says the drones, which are prefab and can be assembled in five to ten minutes, are shipped flat-packed, allowing roughly 500 units to fit inside a standard shipping container."
How do you suppose plastic would compare, on that front?
In a pinch, maybe you could even just use some generic cardboard stock that's found on-site or acquired nearby. Might not work as well, but could be good enough for some purposes.
But a plastic body could be just as easy to assemble.
50 miles range, 80 minutes, 3lb payload.
I'm just saying...cardboard is not much less cost than plastic. Even in bulk.
The inexpensive mass production is the key aspect. -
Conor Stewart Reply
They could do it out of plastic sheets that they then fold and stick together, probably very similar to the existing cardboard design. Maybe the plastic would be even thinner allowing more to fit in a container.bit_user said:The article says:
"The company also says the drones, which are prefab and can be assembled in five to ten minutes, are shipped flat-packed, allowing roughly 500 units to fit inside a standard shipping container."
How do you suppose plastic would compare, on that front?
In a pinch, maybe you could even just use some generic cardboard stock that's found on-site or acquired nearby. Might not work as well, but could be good enough for some purposes.
Also the plastic would be inherently waterproof unlike the cardboard which needs a waterproof coating and the plastic would likely have a smoother surface potentially helping aerodynamics. It might also be able to be bent or folded in different ways to the cardboard to also help with aerodynamics.