IBM Sequoia to Blaze Past Other Supercomputers

There is a new speed demon in the supercomputer circuit.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
  • StupidRabbit
    Looks like the NNSA will be playing "Global Thermonuclear War"...
    Reply
  • leo2kp
    I don't think Crysis will work on that thing. It only uses 2 or 4 cores. Wouldn't run any better, if not worse, than a high-end gaming rig IMO.
    Reply
  • Shadow703793
    1. Why not use Cell and GPUs fore more acceleration.

    2. Why PowerPC CPUs? Cause of the already written code for PPC?
    Reply
  • curnel_D
    Shadow7037931. Why not use Cell and GPUs fore more acceleration.2. Why PowerPC CPUs? Cause of the already written code for PPC?For the poeple writing the code, they're probably more experienced with writing unix based code for ppc instead of x86. Just a guess.
    Reply
  • daBliggah
    The 20 Teraflops speedster will ...

    Shouldn't that read "The 20 Petaflops speedster? Otherwise it would be 1000 times slower than the BlueGene/P at LLNL.

    Reply
  • daskrabbe
    leo2kpI don't think Crysis will work on that thing. It only uses 2 or 4 cores. Wouldn't run any better, if not worse, than a high-end gaming rig IMO.
    I'm pretty sure the graphics use more than 4 pipelines.
    Reply
  • Pei-chen
    Hmm, 2012. Maybe the existence of this super fast PC is what's going to cause the mass extinction on Earth.
    Reply
  • FlayerSlayer
    "With the Sequoia topping out at around 20Tflops, the bar has been raised tremendously in the span of only seven months."

    Don't you mean 20 Pflops? And 7 months from the CREATION of a 1 PFLOPS machine to the DESIGN of the 20 PFLOPS machine, it will be 4 years between their creation.
    Reply
  • Tindytim
    leo2kpI don't think Crysis will work on that thing. It only uses 2 or 4 cores. Wouldn't run any better, if not worse, than a high-end gaming rig IMO.It wouldn't work, but it has nothing to do with cores. It's PowerPC, not x86. Unless they got there hands on the source, or Crytek decided to releases it specifically for that system, it's not going to work.

    Shadow7037931. Why not use Cell and GPUs fore more acceleration.2. Why PowerPC CPUs? Cause of the already written code for PPC?You do know that the Cell is a PowerPC based processor? And they don't need GPUs, this isn't going to do graphical processing. It's for number crunching, not HD video, or gaming.
    Reply
  • AbhiNambiar
    Maybe the Buddhists in Tibet would like to borrow it for a couple days, perhaps? (reference - Arthur C. Clarke, The Nine Billion Names of God)
    Reply