IDF: Full Speed Ahead for Intel SSDs

Intel held a media briefing today regarding its solid state drive (SSD) business, outlining speed, size, OEM partnerships, and some tasty benchmark numbers. SSD product line manager Kishore Rao, got the ball rolling by outlining the two types of SSDs Intel would be releasing in the coming months. Intel will be releasing six drives total, two under the Extreme SATA SSD line, and four under the Mainstream SATA SSD name. The Extreme drives will initially come in only the 2.5" size, with 32 and 64 GB flavors. The Mainstream drives will be available in the 2.5" form factor as well, but will also come in the 1.8" size, allowing all those netbooks and ultraportables the kids are crazy about these days to utilize solid state speed without a huge sacrifice on size. Both sizes will come in 80 GB and 160 GB varieties.

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
  • navvara
    So the mainstream drives use 0.15 watts when active and 0.6 when idle. Care to explain how?
    Reply
  • scooterlibby
    How the heck would a drive double the frame rates from a VR? I know you can get some FPS boosts from new drives (from personal experience going from 8mb SATA to 16mb), but I thought the benefit was in load times. A doubling of frame rates I would think usually attributable to the CPU, RAM, and GPU.
    Reply
  • Area51
    I have had the fortune of having one of the drives for testing for about 30 days now. So far I am hitting the 250MB/s read and close to 70MB/s write. Its also exceeding 3500 IOPS. I haven’t been able to measure the power because it’s so little that it is with the margin of error.
    Reply
  • one-shot
    Wait a minute...wouldn't it go up to .6 from .15? I thought that's how numbers worked. Maybe Intel changed that though...
    Reply
  • cushgod
    How the heck would a drive double the frame rates from a VR? I know you can get some FPS boosts from new drives (from personal experience going from 8mb SATA to 16mb), but I thought the benefit was in load times. A doubling of frame rates I would think usually attributable to the CPU, RAM, and GPU.


    Yes please if someone could explain this that would rock! Thanks!

    And Prices?? How much are we talking .. so as to compare to other SSD's


    Reply
  • wicko
    It could be for games that stream textures. But the article says they got the numbers mixed up, so who knows.. I doubt its anything close to double performance.
    Reply
  • rockyjohn
    Well now I am really confused. The recent article on SSD;s said that highend products used SLC memory and maintstream MLC. Intel does it the other way - their extreme is said to be MLC. Now I am confused about characteristics of both.

    http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/flash-ssd-hard-drive,2000.html

    Can anyone "unconfuse" this?
    Reply
  • A little error in the document: the Extreme series are based on SLC technology and the Mainstream on MLC not the way around.
    Reply
  • TheFace
    I thought that SLC drives were the faster, more reliable, SSDs. Whereas MLC drives were slower, cheaper and less reliable. Does this article have it backwards?
    Reply
  • GlItCh017
    navvaraSo the mainstream drives use 0.15 watts when active and 0.6 when idle. Care to explain how?
    I'm curious as well. I was going to say something but you beat everyone to it.
    Reply