Canonical Releases First Ubuntu With Linux Kernel 3.0

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
TOPICS
Douglas Perry
Contributor

Douglas Perry was a freelance writer for Tom's Hardware covering semiconductors, storage technology, quantum computing, and processor power delivery. He has authored several books and is currently an editor for The Oregonian/OregonLive.

  • memadmax
    huh? what? 3.0 versus 3.0.0? Am i missing something here?
    Reply
  • Stryter
    memadmaxhuh? what? 3.0 versus 3.0.0? Am i missing something here?
    Yea you aren't the only one. If that's not a typo then I don't understand why it was necessary to make that remark in the article.
    Reply
  • kronos_cornelius
    What should I get exited about in Kernel 3.0 ?
    Reply
  • zoemayne
    memadmaxhuh? what? 3.0 versus 3.0.0? Am i missing something here?if your involved in software or programming with versioning its common sense that 3.0 is not the same as 3.0.0
    Reply
  • Well, aside from the other shenanigans in this article, I wouldn't consider alphas to be an actual release, either. They had the 3.0 release candidate kernels in alpha1 and alpha2, so if alpha Ubuntu counts as a release, then 3.0-rc kernels should count as 3.0...

    Sensationalist journalism FTW.
    Reply
  • bv90andy
    kronos_corneliusWhat should I get exited about in Kernel 3.0 ?not much, it's just an honorary version upgrade, coz of Linux being 20 years old now.
    Reply
  • zoemayne
    yea I wouldnt even consider beta a release
    Reply
  • randomizer
    kronos_corneliusWhat should I get exited about in Kernel 3.0 ?Nothing more than would have excited you if it was 2.6.40, because in essence that's what it is.

    I tried updating alpha 2 to alpha 3... it didn't work so well. Time to grab a fresh alpha 3!
    Reply
  • secretxax
    kronos_corneliusWhat should I get exited about in Kernel 3.0 ?
    More Unity? LMAO...
    Reply
  • mayankleoboy1
    can i get the good old "ubuntu classic" on this version?
    i am sick of unity and gnome3
    Reply