AMD: 2D Performance Progress in Windows 7 With Catalyst 10.4?

Summary And Conclusion

Both ATI and Nvidia currently offer their cards with Windows 7 drivers that serve up enough 2D performance for using GDI/GDI+. ATI has almost completely fixed the issues pointed out by our testing with an average performance improvement by almost 100%. This is really a clear answer.

Much of the incoming correspondence from our readers, as well as the positive feedback from some affected software vendors, has confirmed the relevance of our 2D benchmarking. Of course, the typical 3D-focused user hardly runs into the problems we described, so we can understand some of the doubts expressed regarding our findings as well. The reactions of the driver team and the timing of the implementation prove that AMD/ATI, too, has taken this issue more seriously than it initially publicly admitted.

In the end, the solution was developed quickly and the affected software now works without any restrictions. Only the ‘Task Manager paradox’ shown in our test results keep our minds occupied, as we see a great potential for further performance increase here.

Are Other Graphics Cards Affected?

In addition to benchmarks run on the high-end cards, we also performed some random testing with mid-range cards (GeForce GT 240 and Radeon HD 5750). The results are similar enough to those of the high-end cards that we can dismiss the existence of exceptions, and expand our conclusion onto the smaller cards of the current product series.

One Small Restriction

Despite significant improvements made by the ATI driver developers and Nvidia, the two graphics manufacturers are not exactly soiling themselves with glory. The performance level that Windows XP sported in 2D is still very much missing.

  • ta152h
    Well, Microsoft creating an even slower operating system than their previous one is a company tradition. Bloated, slow, buggy software is something they take seriously, and it's not up to companies like AMD or Nvidia to take this privilege from Microsoft. People like it - they keep buying it.

    It's a pity OS/2 never made it. Windows needs real competition. Look what the K8 did to Intel.
    Reply
  • The Greater Good
    TA152H, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
    Reply
  • Lines, ellipses, and polygons are rarely, if ever, used in window system toolkits from the last 5-7 years. You will likely never see them used other than in specialized benchmarks. They are an API vestige of days long past.
    Reply
  • Am I missing something? 10.5 is the most recent
    Reply
  • Poisoner
    the greater goodTA152H, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
    What was insane about his post?
    Reply
  • Does Catalyst 10.5 bring anything new to the table?
    Reply
  • spidey180
    Keep up the good work ATI.
    Reply
  • FUtomNOreg
    Now where did I put that PCMag Winbench CD?????
    Reply
  • outlw6669
    Does Catalyst 10.5 bring anything new to the table?
    You can now over/underclock while running multiple displays without tearing on the second monitor....
    Other than that, looks to be just a few minor bug fixes.
    Reply
  • neiroatopelcc
    PoisonerWhat was insane about his post?just everything


    @ toms - nice article as usual.
    Reply