Ads
Ads
All about Tweaking & Tuning
 Latest Tweaking & Tuning articles
Tuning Cool'n'Quiet: Maximize Power And Performance, Part 2

Tuning Cool'n'Quiet: Maximize Power And Performance, Part 2
In Part 1, we showed you how to optimize the settings of your Cool'n'Quiet-equipped processor and what sort of power benefits you could expect as a result. Now it's time to run the benchmarks and see how our optimized settings actually perform. Read More

All Tweaking & Tuning articles

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post

Partners

The Games selection

kids : Bob Throw bubbles so as to make the ones that appear in the game disappear. For this, use the Right / Left arrow keys to duck or move about, and the...
crazy : PC Breakdown What is worst than a Fatal Error occuring during a game you did not save? Unleash your rage at your PC in this game. Blow it to pieces, it feels so...
Ads

Sponsored links

Hack: Run AMD Fusion Game Util on Intel CPUs

Next news
4:50 PM - January 22, 2009 by Steve Seguin

AMD recently released version 1.0 of its Fusion Gaming utility, but despite efforts to keep the software out of the hands of Intel users, the software can quickly be made compatible with all processors.

AMD released version 1.0 of its AMD Fusion for Gaming utility, which allows users a simple and fast way to prepare their Windows PCs for gaming.  With the press of a button, the application can be used to automatically close down non-essential services, enhance the hard drive performance and even overclock the GPU and CPU. 

Unfortunately for many, the AMD Fusion for Gaming utility is limited to only systems with an AMD processor, although that limitation is artificially imposed by AMD.  The good news is, overcoming such an artificial limitation is often a trivial matter, which we will now demonstrate.

The first step required in this process is the download and installation of the AMD Fusion for Gaming v1.0 utility, located here.  The application should install fine, even if the system does not have an AMD processor.  Attempting to run the application though, without an AMD processor, will result in a notification stating that an AMD processor is required for the application to function.

Now, the next several steps can just be observed, but if you wish to follow along, you will need a debugging application and a system with a non-AMD processor.   We used Ollydbg v1.10 for our debugging needs, which can be downloaded for free here.

Open Ollydbg, making sure it is run as an adminstrator, if required.  Through Ollydbg, we will open (Menu > File > Open) the main executable of the AMD Fusion for Gaming utility that we had already installed, which has the filename "AMDFusion.exe".  Becareful not to confuse this file with the installation file.  This file is likely located in the following directory:

C:\Program Files\AMD\AMD Fusion for Gaming 1.0

If you are not already familiar with assembly code or software debugging, the seemingly cryptic code that should now appear in Ollydbg may take some time to understand.  Teaching how to read assembly code though is beyond the scope of this article, but the following steps should still be simple enough to follow even without any previous experience.

As we already know, the AMDfusion.exe application seems to check if the current system uses an AMD processor and halts the applicatoin if there is none present. What we want to do is find and modify this processor-checking portion of code in the application, so that the application either bypasses the processor-check or is tricked it into thinking that we are running an AMD processor. 

To do this, we will want to right-click the mouse in the main sub-window of Ollydbg, which should bring up a menu.  From this menu, we want to select  "Search for" and then "All referenced text strings".   This in turn opens up another window, listing all the text strings that the AMDfusion.exe application uses.  If you do not see the "Search for" menu option when you right click, you might be right-clicking in the wrong area.

On a hunch, we want to look through this list of text strings, keeping our eyes open for anything that may seem suspicious.  Less than half of the way down the list, we should see the following suspicious text strings: "AuthenticAMD", "GenuineIntel", "CyrixInstead" and "CentaurHauls".  These text strings are CPU identifiers and are likely used in determining what brand of processor the system is using.

Lets find out where in the application these text strings are being used and see if we can modify the code to our favor.  To do this, right click the "AuthenticAMD" text string and select from the menu, "Follow in Dissassembler".  We should now see where the "AuthenticAMD" text string is being used in the actual code; apparently the "GenuineIntel" text string is used not far away from it either.

Now that we are at the portion of code that seems to be where we want to be at, lets start making some modifications.  One obvious thing we can try is to just switch the lines of code that the "AuthenticAMD" and "GenuineIntel" text strings are mentioned in.  For example, the two lines of code as displayed on our system are "PUSH AMDFusio.00420E64" (for AMD) and "PUSH AMDFusio.00420E54" (for Intel), so switching them around simply means modifying a single digit in each line of code- the 6 and the 5.  Simply double click the code you wish to modify to edit it.  When you double click on the code, the code might appear a bit different, such as "PUSH 420E54", but do not worry, just modify the single digit that needs changing.

Once we have modified the two lines of code, the debugger should now allow us to run the AMDfusion application on Intel-based systems.  To test this out, in Ollydbg lets run the loaded application (Menu > Debug > Run).  The AMDfusion application should run now fine on an Intel-based system!

However, the changes we have just made in the debugger to the application are temporary.  The actual AMDFusion.exe file was not modifed by the debugger when we modified those lines of code and to do so requires actually altering the file itself manually.  This can be accomplished by using a hex editor.  Do not quit the debugger yet though if you have it open, we will still need to refer to it in just a bit.  If you wish to modify the AMD Fusion for Gaming ultility to work with your Intel-based system, you will need to atleast do the follow steps.

There are several free hex editors available for download online, but the one that we will be using can be found here. Install and open the hex editor, making sure to run the hex editor as an Administrator.  Open the AMDFusion.exe file from within the hex editor (Menu > File > Open).  Now, from the menu, select "Search" and then "Find".  We want to search for the lines of hex code that we modified in the debugger.  In our case, the first line of hex code we modified was "68 64 0E 42 00", so we enter that and hit "OK".

The hex editor should quickly find the line of code that we are searching for in the AMDFusion.exe file and once it does, we will need to modify it like we did in the debugger.  In this case, we need to change "68 64 0E 42 00" to "68 54 0E 42 00".  We also need to find the hex code "68 54 0E 42 00" and modify it to "68 64 0E 42 00", while being careful not to confuse it with the line of code we just changed.  The above embedded image highlights which bytes of code need changing.

Once we properly modify these two bytes of hex code, we will need to save the file.  To be safe, I recommend saving the file as a new file name, such as "IntelFusion.exe".  You will not be able to save the file as the original name if the file is in use or is currently running.

Now, you should be able to run the newly modified file from the "AMD Fusion for Gaming 1.0" folder on an Intel-based PC, without problem.  We are not responsible however for any problems or issues you may encounter with this procedure, nor do we endorse the modification of the AMDFusion.exe application.  It is interesting to note however that bypassing CD checks, trial limitations and product key registrations can often be achieved using a very simliar manner to what was shown here.  

Source : Tom's Hardware US

Talkback
Add your comment
sacre 01/22/2009 11:16 PM
Hide
-1+

C'mon AMD, you've got to better then that to keep your software, yours.

goonting 01/22/2009 11:23 PM
Hide
-1+

now thats just crap...hehehe...thats just like intel to me...

m3d 01/22/2009 11:41 PM
Hide
-1+

Any performance numbers before and after?

Pei-chen 01/22/2009 11:52 PM
Hide
-3+

I like manual OC better. Auto overclock are usually crappy and unstable.

timaahhh 01/23/2009 12:09 PM
Hide
-7+

Quote :It is interesting to note however that bypassing CD checks, trial limitations and product key registrations can often be achieved using a very simliar manner to what was shown here.
ROFL

smithereen 01/23/2009 12:20 PM
Show
Lord Gornak 01/23/2009 12:31 PM
Show
VTOLfreak 01/23/2009 12:35 PM
Show
xyster 01/23/2009 12:40 PM
Hide
-6+

Quote :Any performance numbers before and after?

You can customize the program to best fit your system. There are three pre-configured profiles though, some of which actually do require ATI graphics or an AMD processor to fully function. (ie: overclocking)

The most basic profile simply seems to disable background services. On an old AMD Sempron machine, running Windows XP and Nvidia-based graphics, we compared performance before and after with 3DMark06 while using the basic profile. We saw virtually no performance difference. Results will likely vary, from system to system, of course.

The more advanced profiles will likely result in more substantial gains.

techguy911 01/23/2009 12:47 PM
Hide
-5+

Quote :Why would you post such a thing? I see this as equivalent to piracy, except that AMD is giving it away to its customers. They go out and design a program that makes Windows Vista orders of magnitude more friendly, give it away for free to their customers, and you post instructions on how to steal it. Is this a good way to encourage them to make more useful applications?

For shame


Steal? its free you can't steal something if its free LoL........

xyster 01/23/2009 12:49 PM
Hide
-4+

Quote :"useful"??? You don't think this placebo crap actually improves performance, do you? If you need to shut down services to gain extra FPS in your games I suggest you add an extra stick of RAM in your system.

It may not actually do a whole lot for performance, but it might help system stability by preventing certain background services from suddenly deciding to being a resource hog.

If you do actually have an AMD CPU or ATI graphics card, the auto-overclocking feature might actually be of some use. Intel users will not benefit from these features, it seems.

Anonymous 01/23/2009 1:01 AM
Hide
-1+

Just did this, the first part "look for authenticAMD" this comments don't exist in their lastest program. But you can use the hex editor to find the statement and change it. I ran a simply CSS test with 4 gigs of ram on windows 7 got 375 fps before, after running program at "expert" level get 396 fps. Thats for anyone that wanted an example, GL HF.

xyster 01/23/2009 1:14 AM
Hide
-1+

Quote :Just did this, the first part "look for authenticAMD" this comments don't exist in their lastest program.
Could you explain the issue you are having further?

The procedure was posted for educational purposes, so if it does not work for everyone, I'm sorry, but you get the idea I hope. I'm sure even AMD users will find this article interesting.

jrabbitb 01/23/2009 1:14 AM
Hide
-11+

@ smithereen

Toms Didn't tell us in any way how to "steal" this software, they told us how to mod it to do more then it originally would.

You wouldn't say overclocking from 3.0Ghz to 3.6Ghz is stealing money because they (intel/amd/via/whoever) also sell a 3.6Ghz chip, would you?
Or perhaps you would if a utility came out which unlocked the multiplier on all processors (black editions or not).

There seem to be a lot of pro/con piracy articles and comments lately.

Having something like this on toms is nice; as a coder it not only lets me know that it can be done to other software, but also my own. Why I didn't think of it, idk, guess I had to much hardware and not enough software on my mind.

Either way, a 'hack' like this could be very useful to a lot of people who are not pirates.

smithereen 01/23/2009 1:27 AM
Show
gosefroba 01/23/2009 1:30 AM
Hide
-3+

i had no difference i ran 3dMark06 and scored a whole 2 points higher so yea this is sort of useless

jrabbitb 01/23/2009 1:43 AM
Hide
-11+

@smithereen

This is a site for information. to say toms isn't justified to post information is like saying information is illegal. This is the free world, where ideas and knowledge flow freely (if AMD cares that it is this easy now they can fix it because someone found it and freely posted it). If you want to live in a justified world move to china.

Next you'll be telling us we should burn all programming books so that the people who figured this out wouldn't have the learning tools to know how next time.

And for the sake of argument. To kill someone you need only slice their throat from behind with a sharp knife. Make sure the slice is deep and across the airways as this will improve you chances of stopping life. free world, freedom of the press, STFU (or rather don't because it's a free country, but we dont have to listen to your naivety)

seboj 01/23/2009 1:59 AM
Hide
-3+

Welcome to Reverse Engineering.

Anonymous 01/23/2009 2:15 AM
Show
zenmaster 01/23/2009 2:20 AM
Show
Anonymous 01/23/2009 3:51 AM
Show
TheCapulet 01/23/2009 4:06 AM
Hide
-9+

This isnt a 'software licensing hack'. Seriously, if AMD was THAT concearned about protecting their ip with this, they would have set countermeasures in place, and written a more stringent EULA. I can promise you Toms/Best of Media isnt stupid enough to post something like this without reading the program EULA, and risk a lawsuit with a hardware giant. So stop the bitching.

And I'd much rather see a how-to on a decent editorial site than see a hacked .exe on torrents with a repackaged virus. Thanks for the info Toms. I always wanted to use the fusion. I am afterall a HUGE AMD customer, even if my gaming machine doesnt use their old tech processors. (I use mainly AMD dualcore chips in 90% of the home PC's I make.)

leorick 01/23/2009 4:18 AM
Show
macbookpro 01/23/2009 4:34 AM
Show
Jake_Barnes 01/23/2009 4:39 AM
Show
macbook 01/23/2009 4:40 AM
Show
Curnel_D 01/23/2009 4:42 AM
Hide
-5+

I'm in the process of retrofitting my newly downloaded and hacked fusion with Intel graphics. But I havent settled on a name yet. What should it be? :P

Curnel_D 01/23/2009 4:44 AM
Hide
-5+

Oh, and nice 'macbook' and 'macbook' pro. It couldnt be more obvious that you're the same person. :P

macbook 01/23/2009 4:46 AM
Show
xTalent 01/23/2009 5:21 AM
Show
Jake_Barnes 01/23/2009 5:22 AM
Show
Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links