Intel Core i7 (Nehalem): Architecture By AMD?
Intel's new Core i7 processors represent a major evolution of the Core 2-series, though a lot of the additions look like they come from AMD's playbook. Is there any truth here or are we the only ones thinking it? Read More
- Intel Nehalem Microarchitecture and QuickPath Architecture Flash Demos
- AMD Says Intel Nehalem Microarchitecture Copied Their Design
- Dreamworks pick Intel's Nehalem and Larrabee over AMD/ATI
- Intel to bring back Hyperthreading with Nehalem core
- HD4850 on Intel Nehalem - PCMark/3DMark Preview
- Best Processor for Gaming ??
- Memory speed:CPU FSB - need clarification
- OC'ing the DS3L vs. the DS3R
- Intel to drop overclocking for mainstream Nehalems
- You lied to me TOM! A rant.
- AMD Has An Ace Up Its Sleeve
- Intel Shows Off Insanely Overclocked And Aircooled Nehalem - But We...
- Intel "Nehalem" Performance Is "Touchy"
- Computex: Intel's Speedy "Nehalem"
- AMD Launches AMD Game For Change
- Intel Intros Diamondville CPU, 4-series Chipsets
- Nvidia Unveils Tegra: A Computer On A Chip
- $5K PC Takes On $4.6M Supercomputer
- Nvidia To Shed Light On Its Processor Strategy At Computex
- Via Launches Nano Processor
Intel Nehalem To Allow Overclocking, Some Processors Will Even Encourage It
Taipei (Taiwan) - Hot on the heels of AMD’s overclocking secret, we can reveal that Bloomfield and Lynnfield, key processors of Intel’s upcoming Nehalem family, will indeed feature overclocking capabilities for up to 16 CPU cores.
Credible information we were able to obtain from industry sources suggest that rumors about Intel preventing users from overclocking Nehalem processors are false. From what we have learned, Intel has very healthy silicon on its hands. It appears that there are some challenges related to overclocking, especially in the memory controller area. However, it is unlikely that there will be anything that prevents overclocking of the CPU cores.
Core 3, or whatever Intel decides to call the desktop Nehalem CPU, will be available as an Extreme Edition variant again, which is ready to elevate the performance bar. At the very high-end, Intel is developing the successor of its super-expensive V8 Skulltrail platform. This time around, your Windows Task Manager will see 16 cores and not just eight.
Bloomfield is Intel’s high-end part, featuring a 192-bit DDR3-1333 and DDR2-1600 memory controller. DDR3-1600 support is still unofficial at this point, since Intel is waiting for JEDEC ratification. Lynnfield is the mainstream desktop part, which will feature a more conventional 128-bit memory controller.
Time will tell what Intel’s Bloomfield overclocking potential really is. It will be interesting to see what Fugger, Coolaler, Kinc, Shamino (apologies to the ones I forgot to mention here, but we can’t keep track of all those nicks) and the rest of OC community can do when Bloomfield gets frozen to -100 degrees Celsius. We will try to find out is final silicon immune to the infamous "cold bug" or not.
When Nehalem comes to life, you can expect that our usual suspects will have overclocking motherboards ready — and Intel will have overclockable CPUs.
-
Previous News Article
AMD Has An Ace Up Its Sleeve -
Next News Article
HP Aims To Cut The Carbon Footprint...
React! Return to news index
- Computex 2008: LEDs In Niche Market Applications
- HP Aims To Cut The Carbon Footprint Of Data Centers By 75%
- Intel Nehalem To Allow Overclocking, Some Processors Will Even Encourage It
- AMD Has An Ace Up Its Sleeve
- IBM Cools 3D Chips With Integrated Water Channels
- Computex: Noahpad: "The Classmate, Roommate And Travelmate"


Can't wait
I call Bull shit Theo.
The last Intel person told me the board is peeved so many are getting cheap silicon and cranking it up ... and it is cutting into their profits.
They want to lock us right out.
Hence the 1333 / 1600 FSB ... difficult to push the fsb higher.
I bet they lock the HTT up as much as possible.
This forces people to pay for the better cpu ... not dial it up for free.
Your source is a shill.
I call Bull shit Theo.
The last Intel person told me the board is peeved so many are getting cheap silicon and cranking it up ... and it is cutting into their profits.
They want to lock us right out.
Hence the 1333 / 1600 FSB ... difficult to push the fsb higher.
I bet they lock the HTT up as much as possible.
This forces people to pay for the better cpu ... not dial it up for free.
Your source is a shill.
I hope this news is true coz I think the quad core CPU from Intel that overclocked to 3.6GHZ or 3.2GHZ is still slow; the time Intel develop from extreme slow CPU (386) to Slow CPU (Core 2 Quad overclocked) is more than 20 years and it is terrible. I won't upgrade to it if they lock the overclocking capability on Nehalem, I would prefer to enhance my system with General Computing by GPU with 2 to 4 GPUs; it would be time consuming to modify the software system but it is the way out for stopping slow computer.
"Bloomfield and Lynnfield […] will indeed feature overclocking capabilities for up to 16 CPU cores"
Since when does the number of CPU cores have anything to do with overclocking?
"your Windows Task Manager will see 16 cores and not just eight"
Except those aren't 16 *cores*…
Ive been told that the lower pin count Nehalems WONT be able to be Over clocked, by an engineer who works/worked on them. Guess he didnt know what he was doing, which is either really bad for Intel, or this story is wrong
hopefully it will allow overclocking, just might be a bit more difficult.
I agree with reynod, about Intel forcing users to pay. The fact is that right now and probably well after Nehalem launches Intel holds all the cards. Subsequently they are in a good position to make money.. and like any other company they will press the advantage.
We as consumers must realize that it's competition that make today ridiculously overclockable cpu's possible at low price points. So root for AMD while rooting for Intel because a 700$+ Nehalem is sweet but a 250$ Nehalem is sweeter.
Just wait and see.