Ads
Ads
All about CPU
 Latest CPU articles
Tuning Cool'n'Quiet: Maximize Power And Performance, Part 2

Tuning Cool'n'Quiet: Maximize Power And Performance, Part 2
In Part 1, we showed you how to optimize the settings of your Cool'n'Quiet-equipped processor and what sort of power benefits you could expect as a result. Now it's time to run the benchmarks and see how our optimized settings actually perform. Read More

  • AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE: Same Speed, Less Power
    Today AMD is introducing a revision of its flagship Phenom II X4 965 processor rated at 125W, replacing the 140W part, as well as a new 3.1 version of its Overdrive overclocking software. We take a quick look at both to see what advantages they offer. Read More
All CPU articles

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post

Partners

The Games selection

kids : Bob Throw bubbles so as to make the ones that appear in the game disappear. For this, use the Right / Left arrow keys to duck or move about, and the...
crazy : PC Breakdown What is worst than a Fatal Error occuring during a game you did not save? Unleash your rage at your PC in this game. Blow it to pieces, it feels so...
Ads

Sponsored links

Nvidia Halts Chipset Developments

Next news
6:01 AM - October 8, 2009 by Jane McEntegart

Nvidia yesterday confirmed that the company is halting development of its chipsets because of legal issues with Intel.

Robert Sherbin, lead corporate communications spokesman for Nvidia, told PC Magazine that the company will postpone further chipset investments until legal issues with Intel are resolved in court next year. Intel says that its four-year agreement with Nvidia doesn't cover the Nehalem or Core series of processors and, while the legalities have nothing to do with Advanced Micro Devices, Nvidia has stopped developing chipsets for AMD as well.

"We have said that we will continue to innovate integrated solutions for Intel's FSB architecture," Sherbin told PC Magazine in an email. "We firmly believe that this market has a long healthy life ahead. But because of Intel's improper claims to customers and the market that we aren't licensed to the new DMI bus and its unfair business tactics, it is effectively impossible for us to market chipsets for future CPUs. So, until we resolve this matter in court next year, we'll postpone further chipset investments."

Check out the full story on PC Magazine.

Source : Tom's Hardware US

Talkback
Add your comment
apache_lives 10/08/2009 12:32 PM
Show
dan101rayzor 10/08/2009 12:38 PM
Show
nicklasd87 10/08/2009 12:42 PM
Show
JeanLuc 10/08/2009 12:57 PM
Hide
-20+

Robert Sherbin - Nvidia :
"But because of Intel's improper claims to customers and the market that we aren't licensed to the new DMI bus and its unfair business tactics"



You just have to laugh at this, Nvidia one of the most unethical companies of recent times (in the tech industry) complaining about unfair business tactics.

Tell us Mr Sherbin is it fair business tactics to get developers to enable things like anti aliasing on your products and disable on competitors products a la Batman Arkham Asylum?

Tell us Mr Sherbin is it fair business tactics to disable PhysX on users who want to use their old Geforce cards for dedicated PhysX and use a Radeon as the primary video card?

Tell us Mr Sherbin is it fair business tactics to take advantage of the greedy and stupid by initially charging an unprecedented $650 for a GTX280 video card? (this one might be ok)

The sad thing is if this was AMD I would back them up since it's Intel and no doubt Intel as being a-holes to Nvidia but this time around I don't really care. This is a classic case of the the pot calling the kettle black.

EXT64 10/08/2009 12:58 PM
Hide
-20+

No, GT300 is still alive and well. This is the Chipset, like nForce 4, etc.

dan101rayzor 10/08/2009 1:03 PM
Hide
-3+

EXT64 :
No, GT300 is still alive and well. This is the Chipset, like nForce 4, etc.


ok thanks

Inneandar 10/08/2009 1:04 PM
Hide
-12+

@dan101rayzor: no, this has nothing to do with GT300

Geez, what's with all the hate...
What this means is intel is killing decent integrated graphics for intel CPU's. If you don't want to invest in discrete graphics, an nvidia chipset is often your best option (unless you choose AMD of course).

EXT64 10/08/2009 1:08 PM
Hide
-9+

I guess if you want a decent mid/low end integrated graphics PC, you'll have to go AMD/ATI, as ATI has pretty decent integrated too. I for one never had much problem with NVIdia chipsets, but I have heard of a lot who did.

ceteras 10/08/2009 1:13 PM
Hide
-20+

nvidia chipsets might not have been the greatest, but less competition is never a good thing for us, consumers.

I say this is another example of how intel's aggressive ways could translate to less innovative products on the market, and possibly higher prices for us.

skora 10/08/2009 1:24 PM
Hide
-1+

Maybe we can convince Nvidia to spin off the chipset section and allow for open source hardware design and they make the products and sell them. Its seems to be a fad to take down overbearing monopolistic companies by going open source. If you can't work with intel, and you can't beat them, take their legs out from under them. Follow the OS and virus scan paths. Look at all the big money companies those initiatives have pissed off!!!!

I'm against any company that thinks courtrooms are a place to gain market share. But it is more lucrative to hire a law firm than build a better cheaper product than then next guy. And the bottom line is the only line.

joeman42 10/08/2009 1:27 PM
Show
the_krasno 10/08/2009 1:32 PM
Hide
--2+

Who cares, most people go with an Intel chipset anyway and then add the graphics card of their choice.

Regulas 10/08/2009 1:42 PM
Hide
-5+

I wonder if this will affect the ATOM and the ION? Loss of competition is almost always a bad thing.

apache_lives 10/08/2009 1:46 PM
Show
kartu 10/08/2009 1:54 PM
Hide
-11+

Jeanluc :
You just have to laugh at this, Nvidia one of the most unethical companies of recent times (in the tech industry) complaining about unfair business tactics.


Everything is relative. Compared to Intel, who threated its partners so that that they refused to get AMD CPUs FOR FREE, they are angels.

hixbot 10/08/2009 2:01 PM
Show
Pei-chen 10/08/2009 2:13 PM
Hide
-5+

Wow, lots of hate and fanboyism here. Yet I won't be surprised if GT300 turns out to be another G80/G92 and everyone jumps onboard. Customer royalty only last a few months apparently.

BTW, in case the fanboys forget, it was Nvidia's nForce and nForce2 that got AMD into performance PC. Before that, AMD's own chipset are expensive and lack lots of features.

ohim 10/08/2009 2:35 PM
Hide
-0+

1 more thing not to like intel . They realy hate competition that badly. Too bad there are shitloads of ppl who for few % in performance still sustain intel in their quest to overtake the PC industry after that they won`t be able to buy even a midrange CPU from their beloved performance king so they will start to look for shitty cheap cpus .

ohim 10/08/2009 2:38 PM
Hide
-3+

I mean let`s assume that AMD wouldn`t exist now, you won`t be seeing ppl looking into buying a Core i7 920 (wich would of cost about 1000$+) for their gaming rig but would be looking at a E5400 in the range of 300$.

Ryun 10/08/2009 2:47 PM
Hide
-0+

Man, that really sucks. High power consumption was always present on some of the higher end chipsets but generally nVidias chipsets were solid (I have a 680i humming along just fine upstairs).

I don't see why they can't just make AMD chipsets though. While I surmise that the market for an expensive AMD system with SLI is quite low, I'm sure chipsets with an IGP that can do multi-channel digital audio via LCPM (a la 9300 MCP) would do just fine.

dheadley 10/08/2009 2:52 PM
Hide
-4+

Say whatever you want, but Nvidia's chipset's in years past allowed a lot of people that build their own systems to build much higher performance and feature rich systems at a much lower price point than anything available from Intel.

I've used boards built on their design for my gaming rigs for years and am on my 5th Nvidia motherboard/AMD CPU/SLi combination, and have built 6 other non-SLi systems as well for our house. While their drivers are definitely hit or miss on the quality, the hardware has never let me down yet. I've had a dozen motherboards, at least 25 video cards and never had any problems with a single one.

On the other hand prior to switching to Nvidia, I used to build a lot of single processor Intel and dual processor systems starting with Pentium/Tyan Tomcat boards right on through Xeon's and have had a lot of motherboard failures on Intel's "server" class boards that I paid 3 times the money for. I remember a time when I was building dual Pentium Pro systems that one Intel board I used was such complete trash that I had 6 fail in a 8 month period and started finding the $500+ board at flea market computer shows for under $100 in less than 6 months because everyone thought they were junk.

Nvidia chipset's no problems and great performance from integrated video, Intel chipset's lots of problems and returns plus crappy performance from integrated video. Tough choice.

chunkymonster 10/08/2009 3:28 PM
Hide
-1+

I hate to see consumer choice limited by a few dominant companies but I have to say that I will not miss mobos with nVidia chipsets. After owning 3 mobos with nVidia chipset (original nForce, nForce2, and nForce4), only one of the three was worth the money. Between compatibility issues and mobos maker implementation issues, I have and will stick with Intel and AMD chipset mobos. Sorry nVidia, your gpu's are great but your chipsets were just aight...

Scotteq 10/08/2009 3:36 PM
Hide
-0+

Well... From an outsider's perspective, when you have a loose cannon for a CEO who enjoys telling his (supposed) parthers about how terrible they are and about how his great new stuff is going to take over the markets - it shouldn't be surprising when those partners give said CEO instructions on various ways to p*ss up a rope.

I'm not saying it's fair. I'm not saying it's right. But I am saying nVidia have to be idiots for not seeing it coming.

mowston 10/08/2009 3:38 PM
Hide
-0+

With the new Lucid chips, I guess Intel said "We don't need no stinking SLI". And Nvidia can't afford to disable multi-GPU on Intel chipsets. I wonder if Nvidia will license SLI for use on AMD boards now though, or if AMD will use Lucid.

ProDigit80 10/08/2009 3:40 PM
Hide
-1+

Boo @ Intel!!!!

sidran32 10/08/2009 3:40 PM
Hide
--3+

nVidia should have brought Intel to court on this rather than giving in...

jblack 10/08/2009 3:56 PM
Hide
-0+

Honestly this is going to push me away from Intel CPUs. Here at work I've been buying AMD, because they come with Integrated graphics that handles DVI and will allow me to do dual monitor (The second connection is VGA though). I honestly think this may hurt Intel more than it helps.

grandshadow3581 10/08/2009 4:05 PM
Hide
-0+

I had a couple of chipsets from NVIDIA for my AMD processors and they seemed to work great. Even though they say they're not developing chipsets for AMD processors. It looked like they haven't made too much effort to develop chipsets for the AMD processors for while.

ohim 10/08/2009 4:15 PM
Hide
-0+

mowston :
With the new Lucid chips, I guess Intel said "We don't need no stinking SLI". And Nvidia can't afford to disable multi-GPU on Intel chipsets. I wonder if Nvidia will license SLI for use on AMD boards now though, or if AMD will use Lucid.


problem is i belive nvidia has licensed intel for sli so by forbiding intel to make sli compatible mobos in the future would mean bearking some licesing contracts before term wich would mean in more loss for nvidia side ... oh well ... like nelson_nel above said business is an unfair realm, funny thing is that intel seeks out to destroy the very companies that makes their CPUs worth something in an end game PC, nvidia and ati(amd). Wonder what would happen if nvidia / ati would pull the plug in offering GPUs for intel platforms somehow.

bk420 10/08/2009 4:18 PM
Hide
--1+

Thank god for Lucid Hydra / MSI Big Bang due out soon!

Spanky Deluxe 10/08/2009 4:28 PM
Hide
-1+

This is bad news for the consumer. Nevermind Intel, nVidia or AMD's business tactics, the result of all this will be that new mid-range laptops with Core processors will be lumbered with Intel integrated graphics instead of the far better nVidia options such as the 9400m.

This will also put back Core powered Apple laptops by six to nine months across the line.


Sponsored links

Related articles

  • Test Hardware and Components HardwareTechnical Details AMD Motherboard (Socket AM2+) Asus M3A32-MVP Deluxe WiFi Revision: 1.02G Chipset: AMD790FX + SB600 Bios: 1202 (07/03/2008) Intel-Motherboard (Socket 775)Gigabyte X48T-DQ6 Revision: 1.3 Chipset: Intel X48 + ICH9 Bios: F5 (07/21/2008) Intel-Motherboard (Socket 1366)Intel DX58SO Revision: 403 Chipset: Intel X58 + ICH10 BIOS1: SOX5810J.86A.2260.2008.0918.1758 BIOS2: SOX5810J.86A.2624.2008.1021.1531 DDR2-Memory AMD SystemA-DATA DDR2-800+ (2x 2 GB) Type: AD2800E002GU Setup: DDR2-800 (CL 4.0-4-4-12-1T) DDR3 Memory Intel SystemA-DATA DDR3-1600 (2x 2 GB) Type: AD31600X002GU Setup: DDR3-1333 (CL 7.0-7-7-20) Graphics CardMSI N280GTX-T2D1G-OC Chip: Nvidia GeForce GTX280 (GT200) Core Frequency: 650 MHz Memory: 1024 MB GDDR3 2300 MHz (512 Bit) Blu-Ray-ROMPioneer BDC-202BK SATA150 Hard DriveCaviar SE 320 GB (WD3200AAKS) 7,200 RPM, SATA/300, 16 MB Cache PSUCoolermaster RS-850-EMBA 850 W, ATX 12V 2.3 Sound CardCreative X-Fi Xtreme Gamer Chip: X-Fi Xtreme Fidelity A/D Converter: 96 kHz/24 Bit USB-StickCorsair Flash Voyager 4 GB Write: 16 MB/s Read: 33 MB/s   Drivers DriverDetails ATI Chipset 7.8Northbridge Filter Driver 1.02.000.2 IDE Driver 5.1.0.8 Intel Chipset9.0.0.1008 (6/2/2008) Intel Chipset (Nehalem)9.1.0.1007 Intel Matrix Storage8.5.0.1032 Nvidia Graphics Card177.41 WHQL (06/26/2008) Creative Audio Driver2.15.0006 (03/14/2008)

  • CPU: Intel Core i7-975 Since the memory performance differences are smaller on slower processors, we decided to use the fastest Core i7 processor available: the new 3.33 GHz Core i7-975 Extreme Edition. It succeeds the 3.2 GHz Core i7-965, inheriting all technical characteristics, such as the 45 nm Nehalem core, 6.4 GT/s Quick Path Interconnect (QPI), 8 MB L3 cache, 256 KB L2 cache for each of the four cores and Hyper Threading. It also includes Turbo mode, which automatically overclocks the Extreme Edition Core i7 processor by one clock speed increment if possible within the 130 W thermal envelope (and two bins if only one core is active).Besides the 133 MHz clock speed increase—which is rather insignificant—the main difference is the upgraded stepping. The Core i7-975 is a D0 model, while the i7-965 CPUs were manufactured using C0 silicon. We locked the Core i7 CPU clock speed to 3.46 GHz manually to avoid performance variances due to Turbo mode; 3.46 GHz equals the 3.33 GHz base speed plus the 133 MHz increment that Turbo would add when activated. Platform: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P Since we are using several MSI motherboards on overclocking projects, and an Asus platform for our upcoming 2009 CPU charts, we looked around for a different platform vendor this time. The board we chose is a Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P, which is based on the X58 Express chipset. It is an upper mainstream version of the EX58 Extreme, which we reviewed here. The layout and base hardware, however, is the same on the Extreme, the UD5 and the UD4P—they share the same 12+2+2 phase voltage regulator, PCI Express configuration and so forth. They differ in features like the heat pipe construction, secondary Gigabit controller, and additional storage connectivity. Gigabyte has done well in refining motherboard platforms by being quick to provide power saving features. Differences can typically be found only if you’re into heavy overclocking, but the overall hardware basis from Gigabyte appears more solid than ever these days. Finally, it’s good to know that the cheaper EX58-UD4P is almost identical, technically, to the enthusiast X58 Extreme. Memory: Corsair Dominator TR3X6G1600C8D (3 x 2 GB) Corsair is one of the top brands for enthusiast memory; we’ve been using DDR3-1600 Dominator memory as our reference RAM for many reviews in Tom’s Hardware labs worldwide. The intention of this review is to try many different memory speeds and both fast and slow timings, hence the TR3X6G1600C8D seemed to be a good choice. It can be overclocked to more than DDR3-1600 speeds, but can also be operated at a conservative DDR3-800 clock. Our timings covered CL6-6-6-18 up to CL11-11-11-30. See more products GigaByte GA-EX58-UD4P Motherboard... Newegg.com $259.99 NextWarehouse $230.34 Lagoom.com $230.50 Directron $243.98 Amazon.com $256.57

  • The C7X58 motherboard tied into the SuperWorkstation 5046A-XB is typical Supermicro fare. That is to say the board is somewhat plain to look at, yet meticulously laid out, passively cooled, and clearly designed with reliability in mind. Because Intel isn’t yet shipping the single-socket “Nehalem-WS” Xeon family, Supermicro’s first-generation workstation design must center on the X58 chipset and accommodate Core i7 processors. It’s worth noting here that Intel is expected to continue supporting the workstation market with X58 once Nehalem-WS emerges. However, that single-socket Xeon will support ECC memory, enhancing the platform’s reliability story beyond what either Intel or Supermicro can boast right now. Supermicro is claiming support for all Core i7 and upcoming Nehalem architecture-based processors, so we assume that this machine will include single-socket Xeon compatibility when the time comes. With that being said, we wouldn’t hesitate to use Core i7 today, even in a true workstation build. Like most enthusiast boards out there, the C7X58 comes armed with six DDR3 memory slots in a triple-channel arrangement. Official support caps out at 24 GB of DDR3-1600/1333/1066/800 using ECC or non-ECC modules. The X58 I/O hub offers 36 lanes of PCI Express (PCIe) 2.0 connectivity and the ICH10 controller wields six lanes of PCIe 1.1. Supermicro uses the chipset’s available PCIe support to enable two 2.0 x16 slots (presumably for graphics cards) and one x8 slot (wired for x4 operation at 1.1 link speeds). There’s also a standard PCI slot, although it and the x8 PCIe connector would both be covered if you opted for two dual-slot graphics cards. This is undoubtedly a limitation for anyone who was also considering an add-in storage controller or a PCI-based sound card. The good news is that, even though Supermicro’s C7X58 is a workstation board, it does support both AMD’s CrossFireX and Nvidia’s SLI multi-card rendering technologies. Would this make an ideal platform for gaming? We think not—selling for $800 online, a gamer could easily find a motherboard/chassis/power supply combination for less that’d still be able to work with both technologies and likely boast more tuning knobs and switches. On the other hand, Nvidia has done a lot of work to its Quadro drivers, making SLI a more marketable feature in its workstation card lineup. SLI currently runs in one of three different user-selectable modes: SLI Frame Rendering, which teams two cards and presents a single adapter to the operating system, SLI Multi-View, which allows multiple displays to render 3D independently, and SLI FSAA, which sounds a lot like Frame Rendering to us with an emphasis on enhancing image quality through anti-aliasing (AA) rather than performance. It’s absolutely feasible that a professional might want to leverage Supermicro’s SLI license to take advantage of the feature. AMD, on the other hand, seems to have put very little into CrossFire support on its FirePro cards, neglecting to even mention it as a supported feature. The FirePro V8700 we put into our test bed here has the requisite connectors, but they remain unutilized. As a result, a professional workstation seems to be overkill for anyone looking to employ a pair of Radeons in CrossFire. As mentioned previously, the C7X58 centers wholly on Intel’s X58 and ICH10 chipset components, so you get six SATA 3 Gb/s ports with software-based RAID 0, 1, 5, and 10; a 7.1-channel Realtek audio codec, eight back-panel USB 2.0 ports (with two more internal), and a floppy controller. There is no legacy parallel ATA support, and Supermicro doesn’t add the third-party logic needed to resurrect it. The company does, however, add FireWire 400 and a pair of Intel 82574L Gigabit Ethernet controllers. Check prices for Supermicro's 5046A-XB