Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Ads

BioShock 2 PC Shuns the Xbox 360 Gamepad

by - source: Tom's Hardware US

BioShock 2 PC gamers will have to kick it old school.

While we're sure that the popular opinion is that the major advantage of playing a first person shooter on the PC is gaining the superior keyboard and mouse control configuration; but now that we in a generation where some gamers grew up playing with a gamepad, perhaps there are some who prefer thumbsticks. BioShock 2, however, won't be catering to those gamers on the PC.

In response to customers asking about using the Xbox 360 controller to play the PC version of BioShock, a 2K Games community manager gave the following response:

I talked to the dev team about controller support for BioShock 2, and I want to let you know that we won’t be adding this into the game in a patch. The decision not to support the controller was not made lightly, and to add it now would take a complete re-envisioning of the UI that the team worked so hard to create.

I’m sorry for those of you who are disappointed, and I want you to know that your comments and concerns have been heard and will be taken in to account when we are planning in the future.

Share:
67
Comments
Read more
X
Submit

Comments
Add your comment
rigaudio 02/12/2010 9:33 PM
Hide
-20+

And nothing of value was lost.

nforce4max 02/12/2010 9:58 PM
Hide
-16+

This is just one of many issues like poor sli support and the issue with wide screen displays.

tomasf 02/12/2010 10:03 PM
Hide
-20+

keyboard and mouse are always a better option than gamepad in fps games

Chris_TC 02/12/2010 10:10 PM
Hide
-19+

Why on earth would I play this (or any other) game with a controller when I can use a high precision tool (mouse)?

maigo 02/12/2010 10:16 PM
Hide
-6+

....so play it on an xbox?

jenesuispasbavard 02/12/2010 10:24 PM
Hide
-9+

Isn't it mandatory for Games For Windows Live games? I'm more comfortable with the gamepad for non-twitch shooters like Bioshock.

edk128 02/12/2010 10:27 PM
Hide
-9+

Yes, people understands, the mouse and keyboard are infinitely better than any other control method in every way. Except for people with HTPCs or people who prefer comfort or choice. Sometimes, I don't want to have to lean forward at my desk to play a game and instead relax and play using a controller. If I am playing singleplayer do I not deserve this?

It seems that every time I see someone wanting to play a game on the 360 gamepad in forums, someone else says "LOL. Why use a gamepad when the mouse and keyboard are more precise?!"

crom 02/12/2010 10:33 PM
Hide
-3+

If you want to play it with the xbox controller, get the xbox version. I can't imagine playing any shooters with a slow to respond gamepad.

logitic 02/12/2010 10:36 PM
Hide
-3+

I agree, they should make all first person shooters not work with the Gamepad.

sliem 02/12/2010 10:55 PM
Hide
-5+

I don't care about no gamepay/joystick support. But to say they have work so hard just to make the UI for keyboard/mouse? please.

carpwrist 02/12/2010 11:00 PM
Hide
-4+

Mouse & Keyboard usually work, but not with the Bioshock ports. The controls are far too sensitive. It's really a hindrance to the experience. It also cheapens the experience of the multiplayer to have your character (and others) violently spin and struggle to hit a target. Not even the Quake series is this ridiculous.

aapocketz 02/12/2010 11:15 PM
Hide
-6+

how come this is a story? I am more sick of PC Racing games coming out that don't support Logitech G25/G27 wheels very well (Like Dirt2).

TheDuke 02/12/2010 11:30 PM
Hide
-4+

didn't think this would be important if your buying on the pc.
Keyboard/mouse>gamepad for shooter and most games

jurassic1024 02/12/2010 11:34 PM
Show
aethm 02/12/2010 11:37 PM
Hide
-1+

Can't say I like this... Sometimes I prefer to use the 360 controller. I used it with Fallout 3 for instance. It's wireless (my keyboard is not) and I have my computer hooked up to the TV. Sometimes it's just easier to use a controller while sitting on the couch than a mouse and keyboard. I also like the rumble... which seems to have completely disappeared from PC gaming devices.

accolite 02/12/2010 11:39 PM
Hide
-3+

If you pirate this gate they will go the way of cod4!

jurassic1024 02/12/2010 11:47 PM
Hide
--1+

Had to add this.
DRM IS NOT WORKING and hurting legitimate buyers with install limits and mandatory internet connections. Sure a PC is almost useless at home w/o internet access, but online contant isn't stellar on most titles so now you get to lose even more money. Instead of using protections that DON'T work, why not take a year if you have to, to come up with something that DOES?! Again, if piracy is hurting you so bad, how is this helping your sales? I wanna see some numbers that show it is working. And I don't mean a little, I mean a lot. If it's not a lot then GET RID OF THE COPY PROTECTIONS YOU MORONS! It's laziness. Devs want to release crap and still expect $50 for it. Not me, and not a lot of people online are going for it. I've yet to read a headline that says DRM is working on a large and noticeable scale. When it does happen, someone wake me up...

maestintaolius 02/12/2010 11:52 PM
Hide
-0+

Well, if enough people are really upset over this, I'm sure someone will program their own patch for it and release it to the masses. That's the beauty of PC gaming, user-generated content/changes.



Unless it's a L4D1/2 mod, cause they generally suck :P.

rpmrush 02/12/2010 11:55 PM
Hide
-0+

I wouldn't have bought this game anyways so I say they aren't losing any money to pirates. I'm wondering what all the hype is about, so I'm trying it out. It's just like the first one. It's an alright game.

seantm 02/12/2010 11:59 PM
Hide
-3+

The Devs should of wrote a message back, "ARE YOU HIGH, AIM WITH A MOUSE RETARD! FFS! NOOB!"

welshmousepk 02/13/2010 12:01 PM
Hide
-6+

i dont intend on playing with a gamepad, but the entire in-game UI seems ripped from the console version. it sure as hell doesn't seem designed for a keyboard and mouse.

their excuse seems like a shoddy attempt to cover up laziness.

welshmousepk 02/13/2010 12:02 PM
Hide
-2+

oh, and there is always xpadder. the game doesn't need to support control pads for you to use one.

teeth_03 02/13/2010 12:06 PM
Hide
-2+
pfroo40 02/13/2010 12:41 PM
Hide
-5+

These days games are typically written for a console and ported to PC. I can't imagine it would be very difficult to carry over a "console mode", where people can choose to play a version that is virtually identical to the 360 version. I have both a high end gaming pc with a monitor etc as well as a very powerful HTPC connected to a much larger 1080p display and have a 360 wireless controller. Some games, single player at least, I prefer playing on my HTPC. Other games, multiplayer and clicky RPGs I prefer my gaming rig. Why should I have to buy a console, plus the console version of games, just to get the gaming experience that really should be included as an optional playstyle in the PC version?

megamanx00 02/13/2010 1:02 AM
Hide
-2+

Interesting. I wonder how different the menus are on the 360 version, of or that was just an excuse :p. I prefer the keyboard and mouse for FPS games, but I do use the 360 controller for some PC ports like Street Fighter, Devil May Cry 4, and Ghost Busters.

Anonymous 02/13/2010 1:09 AM
Hide
--1+

1 Who cares?
2 If you do care, use a different gamepad.
3 Cookies > Pie > Cake.

fulle 02/13/2010 1:16 AM
Hide
-2+

This would suck if programs like Xpadder didn't exist. But, they do. So.... *shrugs*

IFLATLINEI 02/13/2010 1:54 AM
Show
welshmousepk 02/13/2010 2:44 AM
Hide
-5+

@iflatelinei

you are by far the biggest moron I've yet to encounter on these forums. thank you for making me laugh with such an epic fail.

jurassic1024 02/13/2010 2:54 AM
Hide
-2+

pfroo40 :
These days games are typically written for a console and ported to PC. I can't imagine it would be very difficult to carry over a "console mode", where people can choose to play a version that is virtually identical to the 360 version. I have both a high end gaming pc with a monitor etc as well as a very powerful HTPC connected to a much larger 1080p display and have a 360 wireless controller. Some games, single player at least, I prefer playing on my HTPC. Other games, multiplayer and clicky RPGs I prefer my gaming rig. Why should I have to buy a console, plus the console version of games, just to get the gaming experience that really should be included as an optional playstyle in the PC version?



BINGO!

jurassic1024 02/13/2010 3:11 AM
Hide
--1+

edk128 :
Yes, people understands, the mouse and keyboard are infinitely better than any other control method in every way. Except for people with HTPCs or people who prefer comfort or choice. Sometimes, I don't want to have to lean forward at my desk to play a game and instead relax and play using a controller. If I am playing singleplayer do I not deserve this?It seems that every time I see someone wanting to play a game on the 360 gamepad in forums, someone else says "LOL. Why use a gamepad when the mouse and keyboard are more precise?!"



You must be the lonely gamer I spoke of earlier. I'd like to see you try to play NHL or Madden with your friends on an HTPC and TV with a keyboard. In your post, you assume it's only this one game that doesn't need support. There are many.

This one confuses me the most because it is a GFW title. Only reason for lack of support that makes the most sense to me, is that developers want us PC gamers to move to a console. That would be like me going back to a PS2. I don't plan on taking a step backward for full controller support. How can you make a 7GB game but not code for a very popular controller that would eat maybe 50MB of that?

You can make excuses all you want, but you are not the majority. Hence the forums, and this (as well as others) article.


Ads

Best offers

Newsletters


OK
Ads