Best offers
|
Windows 7 Home Premium Upgrade from... | $79.99 STAPLES More info |
|
Office 2007 Home and Student (Full... | $105.73 Royaldiscount.com More info |
|
Windows Anytime Upgrade Windows 7... | $139.99 STAPLES More info |
|
Windows 7 Professional (Upgrade) | $89.99 STAPLES More info |
|
Office 2007 Professional (Academic) | $127.89 Royaldiscount.com More info |
Benchmarking Windows 7: Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger?
Often hailed as the solution to Windows Vista performance problems, we wanted to know just how much better Windows 7 really is. We put one of our most recent test platforms through its paces to find out, benchmarking raw performance and responsiveness. Read More
-
Tom's Definitive Linux Software Roundup: Communications Apps
This is the second part of our Linux Software Roundup. Part one covered Internet Apps. Today we'll be looking at Communications Apps. This includes personal information managers, email clients, instant messengers, VoIP software, and IRC clients. Read More
-
How To: Windows XP Mode In...Ubuntu Linux?
Windows 7's XP Mode has already convinced many users who sat out for Vista to go out and upgrade. But will they buy the right version of Windows 7 to get XPM? You do know you can get the same XP functionality from a Linux distribution for free, right? Read More
Partners
The Games selection
kids :
Bob
Throw bubbles so as to make the ones that appear in the game disappear. For this, use the Right / Left arrow keys to duck or move about, and the...
|
crazy :
PC Breakdown
What is worst than a Fatal Error occuring during a game you did not save? Unleash your rage at your PC in this game. Blow it to pieces, it feels so...
|
Sponsored links
Review: Which Face-Tagging Software Is Best?
Next news- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (6) |
- Share
Suddenly, facial recognition software is everywhere.
Suddenly, facial recognition software is everywhere. So, Tom's Guide pitted the software titles against each other in a review published today. Apple's iPhoto '09 is the oldest of the bunch--it was launched back in January. Since then, four competitors have arrived. Face.com's Photo Tagger and Microsoft's Windows Live Photo Gallery showed up in July, then came Cyberlink's MediaShow 5 in early September. Finally, Google added photo tagging to its desktop application Picasa 3.5 just a couple weeks ago.
The ability to scan and recognizes faces is fast becoming a must-have feature in all photo organizing and editing software. So, which one should you get? They each excel in different ways. We rated the software titles on these criteria: features and innovation, user interface and ease of use, analysis speed, and accuracy.
You'd be surprised at the false positives some of these software titles think are actually faces (ears, elbows, dogs, and worse). Overall, however, we were impressed with how far this technology has come, and how much easier and more fun hunting for and viewing photos can be when your computer knows who is in them.
Update
If you’re on Facebook and enjoy tagging your photos, you might want to check out Face.com’s Photo Tagger tagger application first-hand. We’ve described what the program is and how it works in our feature story, but Photo Tagger is currently in public alpha and only accessible on an invitation basis. Fortunately, for the first 50 Tom’s Guide readers, we’ve got your invitation right here! Just click this link and try out this great tool right now.
Source : Tom's Hardware US
Sponsored links
Related articles
-
Asus likes to position the M70S specifically as a multimedia notebook. That makes it very interesting since the review unit the company sent included a 1440x900 resolution monitor and a DVD burner, rather than a 1920x1200 WUXGA monitor with Blu-ray player, both of which are available as options for this particular notebook. At the time our unit was received, these notebooks were in very high demand, however. We only got to keep ours for a few weeks, then had to ship it back, presumably to make it available for other reviews. Anybody who is serious about using this notebook for multimedia applications would be very well advised to purchase a properly equipped model like the one from DataVision for $2,300 rather than one equipped as ours was, like this $1,400 unit from Provantage.com. That said, we can only review the units that the vendor chooses to send us. At 9 pounds, the M70S is typical for a 17" notebook, while the AC adapter and cord add another 1.96 pounds to the load. As equipped, our M70S was no slouch, though of course it suffered from its inability to play back Blu-ray media or to provide full 1080 resolution for HDTV playback. That said, it does include a decent set of Altec Lansing speakers and support for Dolby Home Theater playback, and its ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 graphics circuitry delivered good video playback and modest gaming support (as you’d expect on a multimedia unit that’s not aimed at hardcore gamers). Once again, we suffered from glossy surfaces inside and out (which explains why so many of these notebooks include microfiber cleaning cloths). As delivered, the M70S we reviewed included an Intel Core 2 Duo 7700 with a 2.4 GHz clock speed (more expensive models feature a 2.5 GHz model instead) and 2 GB of DDR2-667 RAM (more expensive models usually include 4 GB, even though the OS and graphics circuitry drop usable RAM to around 3 GB). This unit included 1 TB of onboard storage, in the form of two 500 GB Hitachi 5400 rpm SATA 300 drives. It also included a Marvell Yukon GbE wired network interface and an Intel 4965 802.11a/g/n wireless interface as well. Ports and connectors are the same for all M70S models, except, of course, that the optical drives will differ in what they can do. Check out the images for more details on what you’ll find on each side of the system. The display deck also includes a built-in 1.3 Mpixel Webcam and a microphone at the inside top above the screen. Two stereo speakers are mounted on the keyboard deck above the keyboard (one to the left of the special media keys (aka "Instant Keys"), the other to the right of the indicator LEDs and start button). To the left of the LEDs, you’ll find an ambient light sensor that this notebook uses to adjust brightness and backlighting levels automatically (when power saving regimes permit). There’s also a fingerprint scanner available for M70S (it also performs facial recognition using the built-in camera as another biometric check), which is positioned at the bottom center of the keyboard deck, just below the touchpad. Except for the lack of Blu-ray and a high-res monitor, and a somewhat underpowered CPU by comparison to the other notebooks reviewed here, the M70S showed itself to be a decent, capable and workmanlike notebook. However, if sufficiently tricked out, it would be much better able to compete with the other notebooks in this review.
-
Style Have you ever seen a ThinkPad? If so, you know how Lenovo (nee IBM) defines style: black, drab, and utilitarian. But if the ThinkPad line is the corporate drone of mobile computing, the IdeaPad line is the entrepreneurial artiste, and the IdeaPad U110—the smallest and most stylish IdeaPad to date—is the quick-witted fashionista. You need only glance at the U110’s closed lid for a first impression of the design theme here: delicate, spiraling, floral, shimmering, yet subtle "tendrils" (Lenovo’s word, not mine). Before we go any further, I’ll simply express my belief that the U110’s crimson runic patterns will more likely appeal to women than men. That’s not based on a survey, but the odds are in my favor. Red is not among my favorite colors—the unit also comes in black and navy blue—but I adore this computer’s style cues; you may not. The pattern on the lightly textured (etched) lid, with the darker solid-stripe lip and silver reflective Lenovo branding, repeats itself twice more on this computer. Before opening it, flip it over and notice a gray-on-black version of the tendrils, nearly invisible on the lower left corner of the underside. Also on the flip side are other exotic-looking patterns carved into the plastic in a scattered fashion—these are somewhat functional, revealing vents that allow heat to escape. The final iteration of the tendrils can be found on the inside, at the top of the keyboard where the chassis meets the screen hinge. We’ll get to this more later on, but a finger swipe across a patch of seemingly empty black plastic reveals red-lit subcutaneous LEDs in the shape of curlicue tendrils that can serve as multimedia buttons. The last style-oriented feature of the U110 is the abundant use of the currently trendy shiny piano black lacquer on the inside—the flat screen-bezel, the keyboard, wristpad, trackpad and buttons are all coated in the slimy stuff. It feels great to the touch, but if you don’t apply the included chamois every ten minutes during use, the chassis starts to look dull and icky. The sides, battery and bottom of the computer are rubberized instead of lacquered, which makes the machine easy to grip. Even though it is, overall, the smallest machine in this roundup in terms of size (not thickness or weight), the U110 is hearty. The lid is very solid, and as noted earlier, the bottom is ruggedized with rubber (though the little feet on the bottom can sometimes seem a bit slippery on a flat surface). The lid is actually bent at about a 130 degree angle at the last inch closest to the hinge. This bent portion of the metal offsets the screen from the hinge, and strengthens the hinge, which seems to improve viewing angles. Like the Asus U2E, the lip of the lid has no hinge—it stays shut solely via pressure from the hinge. Lenovo even includes a leather carrying case for the U110—this machine is just that fancy. Size and Weight The larger of the two batteries that come with this computer protrudes only slightly from the rear; its curved shape adds to the compact form factor of the machine. The unit’s dimensions are 10.8” wide by 7.7” deep, and 0.88” thick, which is thinner than the Apple MacBook Air. The smaller battery sticks out even less; here you can see the difference: The U110 weighs only 2.4 pounds, but doesn’t include a built-in optical drive; a solid, rubberized black and perforated-metal external drive is included. The Toshiba Portege R500, while a good deal wider than the Lenovo, includes an internal optical drive and maintains the same weight and thickness as the U110. The power supply brick is a featherweight at 0.67 lbs. Will you miss the internal optical drive? I didn’t, but I didn’t take any long distance flights while testing it. DVD entertainment is the only crucial use of an optical drive I can think of; I can’t ding the U110 too much for leaving it out. Ports Switching FireWire for HDMI/Micro-DVI, the U110 has a very similar port configuration to that of the Asus U2E. On the left hand side, the computer has a power port, VGA port, angled fan, two USB ports, and at the edge, a Wi-Fi on/off switch. Along the front bottom lip, Lenovo has placed nothing but a glowing blue LED icon in the shape of a power button, to indicate the computer’s status. On the right hand side there is an ExpressCard slot, an SD (and other format) card reader, a headphone and microphone jack, Firewire port, one final USB port, and a gigabit Ethernet port. There’s no modem, and there’s no internal broadband card—use the ExpressCard slot to get either function if necessary. Speaking of wireless communications, the Lenovo meets all the usual standards except Draft-N. It’s the only one in this roundup to lack N compliance, but perhaps is has been left out because very few consumer router and products actually feature N, and this is a very consumer-friendly machine. Style score: 5 Usability Display In terms of specifications, the U110’s 11.1” screen is identical to the Asus U2E’s—it’s an LED backlit glossy number. But something about the Lenovo’s is just glossier. When I stare into the screen for a while, it seems to be a bit distorted by an extra layer of glass, and the content of the screen looks shimmery and textured; there’s also some glare and distortion. Color vibrancy is spot on, however. The entire display piece—the underside of the lid—is completely smooth, as though made from one piece of plastic, with the exception of the small notch in the top center for the tiny webcam. Keyboard Each key on the smudgy piano black keyboard of the U110 is big—bigger than any key on almost any other ultraportable—but size alone does not a comfortable keyboard make. Each key depresses smoothly and evenly, too, but that also is not enough. For a keyboard to be efficient, it needs to maintain a typist’s speed and keep the error rate low. This keyboard decreased my speed and increased my error rate because of the lack of space between the keys, which are practically flush against each other. They are also completely flat, which means there is no texture or shape, other than a slight concavity, to teach my fingers where each key is. More often than not, I hit a neighboring key by accident because each key is so flat and slick. I didn’t live with this computer for months, and if I did I would surely adapt to its quirks, but why should a keyboard force a user to deal with a steep learning curve? Trackpad The U110’s trackpad is perfectly smooth and matte—it doesn’t have quite the same lacquering as the rest of the chassis, but it does have a little. It is very responsible and slick, and the seam between the trackpad and wristpad is obvious without feeling jarring when you reach it with your finger. The mouse buttons are similar, but received the full piano black paint job. They’re even, only slightly raised from the trackpad, and not too springy when clicked. Some people might prefer a bit more response from the buttons, though. Hardware Controls The "magical" swiping action that activates scrolling the soft keys above the keyboard is one the most whimsical and cutting-edge features of this computer. It might seem inefficient to have buttons that aren’t always visible, but how many people even set up the physical multimedia buttons that grace a typical laptop? One of the buttons launches an audio manager, and two of the other buttons can be tied to a macro that activates just about any other application. There’s also a visible volume control light (up, down and mute). On the left side there is a power button and a "Novo" button. This latter button performs many tasks: generally, clicking it activates power settings to conserve battery life. But if something’s amiss with the machine, clicking it when the computer’s off can activate a system restore the next time the machine is powered on (let’s hope you never have to use it!) Behind these keys are the small "Dolby Home Theater" speakers, one on each side. Perhaps they produce better than average external sound, but it’s still nothing to write home about. Heat and Noise I never felt this machine get warmer than room temperature, nor make any noise at all. That’s surprising given the U110 has a weak hard drive (only running at 4,200 RPM), though the processor never seemed to struggle with any typical tasks, except perhaps upon startup, which took an above average of 90 seconds. I also lost a bit of time every time the facial-recognition software popped up when starting; it works, but steals at least 15 seconds every time you open up the machine. Remember, this is a consumer machine, and it does media well—better than most of its suit-and-tie ultraportable competitors. Check out the Performance section below for more details. Usability score: 3






So.... which one was the best!?
I am a current apple looking to switch to a pc. But, i can say that iPhoto is pretty dope. It's facial regonition is almost 99% effective. It kinda even recognized my pug in a few pictures. Fail when it said a bookcase was my girlfriend.
So.... which one was the best!?
It depends what feature is most important to *you.* For me--Picasa is best because it has lots of features, a natural interface AND accuracy. I also like that I can save my photos to "the cloud" via the same desktop app, and it remembers the tags. None of the other solutions have that. But, it also takes a long time to scan and upload...
Very little related:
I was hoping for an unreported feature on Doom3 back then. Viruslike, while playing the game, it could scan the users hard drive and check for photos, the more personal the better, and use the faces found there as skins for the zombies to kill on a final round after the big boss. And it needed not to be perfect, anything missing would just be blood and of-skin.
Doom3 was a really good game, and with such advances in tech we could see this little fantasy of mine come to life some day. But it will need all the artistic level it can get to provide enough involvement to make the player think they actually have gone crazy, which would be really cool as an experience.
Or just a little crazy, just some well recognized faces from time to time during the game and enough to just hint to the craziness of the gamer, not appearing twice on the same zombie or spot. Maybe just a monochrome overlay over some wall...
/end of daydreaming.
It depends what feature is most important to *you.*
Same could be said for a lot of what Tom's reviews, many of which manage to present some sort of conclusion.
More of a side-by-side comparison would have been helpful.
Same could be said for a lot of what Tom's reviews, many of which manage to present some sort of conclusion.More of a side-by-side comparison would have been helpful.
Point taken, thanks for your input.