Backblaze silently redefines 'unlimited' backups and users discover it's not backing up Dropbox and OneDrive — as firm leans heavier into AI storage services, changes could signal shift away from home backups

Backblaze service
(Image credit: Backblaze)

About two weeks ago, Backblaze sent out an email to its subscribers letting them know about the latest changes to its Terms of Service, and therein lies a paragraph that says that if your usage of the service exceeds "typical usage patterns" or "places an undue burden," the company may throttle or terminate your account, this despite the company's pledge of unlimited backups. There is no definition of what constitutes typical usage, so your guess is as good as ours. The company has also stopped uploading local data synced to other cloud storage suppliers. The changes come as the company has experienced a 40X year-over-year increase in AI data stored on its servers and has increased focus on its accelerating AI business.

Backblaze is perhaps the most popular home computer backup service, offering unlimited storage for a low monthly price and a simplified interface that backs up entire computers and external drives in one fell swoop. That's the sales pitch on the website, except the exact definitions of "unlimited," "computers," and "external drives" are all up for discussion thanks to the company's repeated ToS changes and possibly its market repositioning — and can lead to instances of data loss, as some users found out the worst way.

Article continues below

The alteration was only published in the software's release notes, meaning that most everyone was unaware of it. Some users were caught by surprise by tangible data loss — quite the irony for a backup service, especially one that extolls the virtues of an actual backup versus a file sync in its own blog posts.

Developer Robert Reese found out about the changes in the worst way when he needed to recover data from his Git folders that had been silently added to Backblaze's file exclusions list. He then dug further and, along with other users, found that Backblaze never told anyone about its exclusions of file sync services or Git, and that it's hard to trust a backup service that can at any point unilaterally decide to stop backing up important data.

At face value, one might think that not backing up Dropbox, OneDrive, etc., is not a problem since you'll have copies of the files in those services, but then the difference between a sync and a backup rears its ugly head. First, most of those services only keep deleted data for 30 days, so if you only notice something is gone more than a month, you can't fetch it from Backblaze as expected.

Second, changes to files might fall into a similar trap, as most sync services have limits on age, number of versions, or both, particularly in the free tiers. Third, syncing files back to your PC might overwrite recent changes, and you won't be able to fetch the original copy.

Rubbing salt on the wound, although Backblaze is only meant to back up internal and external drives and not network shares, the client can trip you up in unexpected ways, as external encrypted drives are caught in the crossfire and likewise not backed up.

Other than "it's just business," all these changes might have to do with the fact that Backblaze apparently no longer sees home backups as a business priority. The homepage first and foremost touts cloud and AI storage, with the home backup service tucked away under two menu options.

Back in 2025, the company saw its backup revenue flatten as cloud storage grew and subsequently underwent a restructuring. The firm's latest quarterly results show that AI customers are making Backblaze a lot of money, so it's not hard to imagine the home backup service might be dropped altogether at some point.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Bruno Ferreira
Contributor

Bruno Ferreira is a contributing writer for Tom's Hardware. He has decades of experience with PC hardware and assorted sundries, alongside a career as a developer. He's obsessed with detail and has a tendency to ramble on the topics he loves. When not doing that, he's usually playing games, or at live music shows and festivals.

  • ejolson
    It doesn't seem like a backup to me without a contract specifying the terms and time period over which those terms apply. Moreover, since the terms changed unexpectedly and the current terms indicate accounts may be terminated at any time, if not for a good business reputation, such backups seem even more likely to catastrophically disappear than files written to USB drives and subsequently stored on a shelf in Grandma's root cellar.

    Hmm. Maybe Grandma could make a fortune repurposing the entire basement.
    Reply
  • apothercy
    Well, crap. I've used them for about four years as a backup for my media server. I'm at about 120TB right now and I've never actually needed to use it for a recovery, but it's always been my excuse to not have a proper RAID setup as I could just grab a disk image if I ever had a failure. Now, of course, I'll probably have to do things right while storage costs three times as much. Hooray!

    Wait, just 2TB is the top 1%? Yeah, if I'm not one of the people kicked off I'll be shocked.
    Reply
  • wshwe
    Glad I dumped Backblaze years ago. 😂
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    apothercy said:
    but it's always been my excuse to not have a proper RAID setup as I could just grab a disk image if I ever had a failure
    RAID is not a backup.
    Repeat that as many times as needed.
    Reply
  • ezst036
    USAFRet said:
    RAID is not a backup.
    Repeat that as many times as needed.
    We're fast reaching a point to where services like Backblaze are not a backup.

    And let's face it, OneDrive and Apple's icloud services aren't backup services either.

    These two are digital prisons.
    Repeat that as many times as needed.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    ezst036 said:
    We're fast reaching a point to where services like Backblaze are not a backup.

    And let's face it, OneDrive and Apple's icloud services aren't backup services either.

    These two are digital prisons.
    Repeat that as many times as needed.
    Absolutely.
    Those services can and do change their rules as they wish.
    Reply
  • Buzz42
    Don't forget that they're also not backing up external drives with any sort of software encryption, with the exception of Bitlocker.
    https://www.reddit.com/r/backblaze/comments/1ol0pgf/backblaze_will_no_longer_support_veracrypt_volumes/
    Have not seen a good explanation for this, other than the things they did to break networked/iSCSI drives broke encryption as well, but they certainly have not communicated it at all, to anyone. In fact, there's still documentation on their website as if it was supported: https://www.backblaze.com/computer-backup/docs/resolve-encryption-software-issues
    Their lack of communication on critically important issues is unforgiveable.
    Reply
  • Exploding PSU
    Okay this is kind of concerning. I rely on backblaze as my one and only online backup, I have roughly 6TB of data, so that's going to put me on the top 1%?

    I don't backup strange data, just the most important irreplaceable pictures and videos. Actually I made sure I only upload the most important ones due to my limited bandwidth so there's nothing illegal or bloated or uneccessary... but I still don't like how this announcement sounds..
    Reply