Ads
Ads
All about Optical Storage
 Latest Optical Storage articles
Three Generations Compared: Is Your DVD Burner Outdated?

Three Generations Compared: Is Your DVD Burner Outdated?
DVD burners are extremely cheap. Obviously, it makes good sense to buy a $30 drive if you don't have one yet, but is it worth replacing an existing drive with a newer one? We compared three product generations from Sony/NEC between 16x and 24x speeds. Read More

All Optical Storage articles

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post
Popular Searches

Partners

The Games selection

action : Yoyo the Star Yoyo is a young girl who recently graduated and dreams to become a movie star (don't we all). You'll have to guide her on the path to stardom,...
crazy : Xiao Xiao 7 A great fight scene from the animation movies Xiao Xiao.
Ads

Sponsored links

Intel Light Peak Can Transfer Blu-ray in 30 Secs

Next news
2:00 AM - September 26, 2009 by Marcus Yam

Say hello to optical.

Besides just new processors, Intel also demonstrated a new high-speed optical cable it codenames "Light Peak" that can connect together laptops, HD displays, cameras, video players, iPods, docking stations and solid-state drives.

Sounds like any other cable connecting standard, right? The difference is Light Peak uses optical fiber rather than copper wires, which makes it capable of delivering 10 Gb/s of bandwidth. Intel said that the Light Peak technology has the potential ability to scale to 100 Gb/s over the next decade.

Of course, as with any interconnect technology, Light Peak will need industry-wide acceptance for it to become a reality. Thankfully, Intel does have a major say in chipsets and company expressed that it intends to work with the industry to determine the best way to make this new technology a broadly available standard.

Source : Tom's Hardware US

Talkback
Add your comment
gamerjames 09/25/2009 8:46 PM
Hide
-14+

Useless if you are with TimeWarner

quitoman 09/25/2009 8:46 PM
Hide
-7+

Cool

dman3k 09/25/2009 9:04 PM
Hide
-11+

I've always wondered why not more fiber optic connections. Why not have 2 fiber cables and a cooper cable on one plug? (In, Out, and Power)

gamerjames :
Useless if you are with TimeWarner

ROFL!

ProDigit80 09/25/2009 9:10 PM
Hide
-10+

Fiberoptics are already used in internet Ring networks all over the world.
They're also used in some Sony Audio & hifi.
It's no surprise they will start using this in computers too.
Just know that the fiber optic cables are very sensitive to nicks.
Bend the cable twice in an angle and you can throw it away, or suffer loss of bandwidth.

icepick314 09/25/2009 9:26 PM
Hide
-20+

great!!

we can look forward to Monster brand Light Peak cables where it can make the light travel 5 times faster than generic Light Peak cables.....

Grims 09/25/2009 9:46 PM
Hide
-6+

Interesting...where do we go now after reaching the speed of light?

jarnail24 09/25/2009 9:49 PM
Show
anamaniac 09/25/2009 10:01 PM
Hide
-4+

Now only if more than government had fiber optic net in western canada. =D

shadow703793 09/25/2009 10:03 PM
Show
Zenthar 09/25/2009 10:07 PM
Hide
-7+

I wonder if this could be used for inter-device communication, maybe it would now be possible to put video cards in external enclosures with their own PSU and ventilation. Is PCIe 2.0 x16 8GB/s or 8 Gb/s?

mowston 09/25/2009 10:07 PM
Hide
-5+

Optic cables that have these speeds have been available for networks for a while. The difference with this technology seems like it must be more in the actual interface with the different hardware, not necessarily the cable itself? Sounds more like a replacement for USB and HDMI, etc.

doomtomb 09/25/2009 10:27 PM
Hide
-4+

Go to all optical, do it!!!

frozenlead 09/25/2009 10:34 PM
Hide
-7+

The question is...

If I'm not allowed to back up my Blu-Ray media by copying it to any other media...how did Intel test this?

Anonymous 09/25/2009 11:10 PM
Hide
--1+

Weve already got 40 Gbps optical cables, and 1Gbps copper cables. So, whats so special about this unless its really cheap...

Meh, call me when its 100Gbps. Or if its as cheap as copper.

Area51 09/25/2009 11:10 PM
Hide
-4+

Grims :
Interesting...where do we go now after reaching the speed of light?


Here is the answer to your Question. Make sure you see the entire thing.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mk7VWcuVOf0

ethanolson 09/25/2009 11:54 PM
Hide
-1+

I think the real awesome thing is that they hinted to it being really cheap... like a USB cable.

We already have those speeds... and even more... on both copper and optical. If it's cheaper than 1/10th the cost of InfiniBand, CEE and other things already that fast, then I think it'll still be too expensive for consumers. It better be the cost of a USB cable.

cruiseoveride 09/26/2009 12:28 PM
Hide
-0+

Optical is already a standard for professional audio.

But as a general purpose USB like thing, it would have to be really robust.

sailfish 09/26/2009 12:55 PM
Hide
-1+

While the interface may be capable of 10Gbs, I doubt any device connected to them will transfer at that rate anytime soon. Although, it's nice to know that, potentially, one could get by with daisy-chaining all their devices with just one cable and still have bandwidth left over to spare.

precariousgray 09/26/2009 1:06 AM
Hide
-6+

I'm still waiting on my optical processor made entirely out of glass.

kittle 09/26/2009 1:12 AM
Hide
-0+

icepick314 :
great!!we can look forward to Monster brand Light Peak cables where it can make the light travel 5 times faster than generic Light Peak cables.....


ROFLMAO

nice one :)

Camikazi 09/26/2009 1:17 AM
Hide
-5+

Grims :
Interesting...where do we go now after reaching the speed of light?


Turn back time and transfer data yesterday!

Anonymous 09/26/2009 1:49 AM
Hide
-1+

"I'm still waiting on my optical processor made entirely out of glass."

Glass? Screw that, we need diamond! It would be a GREAT processor material if we could grow them big and cheap. Lot of progress has been made in that area, but still a ways to go.

jkflipflop98 09/26/2009 3:19 AM
Hide
-10+

precariousgray :
I'm still waiting on my optical processor made entirely out of glass.




I'll give you 3 guesses as to what the chip in your computer right now is made of. . .

pakardbell486dx2 09/26/2009 3:52 AM
Hide
-1+

10Gb/s is about 10,000 Mb/s and 20Mb/s is about 2.1 MB/s then 10,000/20=500
and 500 times 2.1 is 1050 MB/s. Holly shit that is fast!!!

gerohmygosh 09/26/2009 4:36 AM
Hide
-3+

Fiber optics.... =] My teacher was talking to me about that being the future when I was in 10th grade... that was about 5 years ago.

michaelahess 09/26/2009 8:53 AM
Hide
-2+

My god there are some STUPID posts today!

First of all to pakardbell (not even going to say it) Mb's are 8 to 1 MB. 10Gb/s is 1280MB/s. Throw together a few enterprise class RAID arrays (fiber channel of course:) ) and you can saturate that.

Second to all of you that seem surprised that fiber is used in anything; all Cable systems are HCF (Hybrid Coax Fiber) at this point, damn near every good audio device has an optical SPDIF (around 650nm wavelength) for DATA transmission (what do you think digital audio is?), and pretty much all backbone's for telecoms are fiber (or microwave).

Now for the expensive bits, the wavelength has something to do with the total possible bandwidth, but for the most part, proper optical cable (not SPDIF) 10Gb isn't exactly breaking a sweat. The receiving/transmitting electronics are very expensive. Just go price out some Cisco 10G SFP's for example. Unless Intel can produce very cheap electronics for this, their idea hasn't a chance of getting off the ground. Considering 1Gb electronics cost a couple hundred bucks a port, 10Gb isn't even worth mentioning. Do CWDM or DWDM and it would possibly be cheaper as you can get multiple 1Gb or even 10Gb wavelength electronics sending over a single fiber pair. Still not cheap though.

To dman3k, if you really want to blow your mind, you can do send/receive over a single fiber, how bout them apples?

To prodigit80, fragile? You can literally lift a car with a good quality single mode fiber (assuming you could find a way to attach it.) It's reinforced with kevlar and depending on its application, the surrounding cable components can be damn near indestructible. If you have optical cable that breaks from bending it, stop buying Monster! But their gold plated optic cables work so well! :) Seriously, good cable can be tied in a knot and pulled on as hard as two grown men can, untangle it and it works like new. I've seen it and done it myself; still links up and transfers at 1Gb. Just don't scratch the fiber at the ferrule unless you like polishing glass. Only ultra high speeds will be affected by the micro/macro bends you could possibly impose on a properly built fiber. And the plastic "optics" most audio fibers are made from? Even more resilient. The $5 amazon ones are great in fact.

And to anyone that thinks high end fiber costs a lot? A 3 meter single mode (much more expensive than multi mode) costs less than $25. Still more expensive than copper, but it's getting a LOT closer without that silly 100m cable limit. And almost nothing any home user would need to do would require single mode, unless you want to run fiber between your house and your moms house 25 miles away!

jkflipflop98 just awesome!

Sailfish, not exactly how it works unless you want to mux/demux every device, but then it gets kinda ugly.

To ertg43tgdf, the fiber has nothing to play in its potential capacity, only the electronics and the wavelength in use.

Maybe this is why fiber optics hasn't caught on in the consumer world; consumers are dumb to the facts and possibilities of fiber...

michaelahess 09/26/2009 8:55 AM
Hide
-1+

Oh yeah, don't crush fiber, it's one real weakness, but good cable construction can prevent all but the worst abuse.

guitarpeggio 09/26/2009 11:02 AM
Hide
-0+

Shadow703793 :
Kind of late with the news Toms.



Did someone force you to read news on this site? Are you a member of some secret "Complainers Club" with the rest of the douche bags that post that same comment everyday?

annymmo 09/26/2009 3:36 PM
Hide
-0+

Now if Intel would make optical processors where the data is processed optically! They really should try to make that.
Reasons: faster in clock cycles, less power needed, gives consumers a reason to buy.
Optical processors could really offer huge advantages.
Optical graphic processors could process thousand times more information than todays, elektronics based ones.

awaken688 09/26/2009 5:16 PM
Hide
-0+

I think fiber and light we'll be the future. Multiple colors of lights, so maybe not just binary on one signal. But 10Gb is not really a big deal to talk about right now, since USB 3 is already going to be 5. Cool to think about, but this particular idea for fiber really isn't very exciting.

awaken688 09/26/2009 5:16 PM
Hide
-0+

we'll = will --- Grrrrr no edit.


Sponsored links

Related articles

  • Color coding example from a typical set-top box: yellow for composite video (FBAS), a pair of white and red jacks for analog stereo, and a trio of jacks in red/blue/green for HDTV components These are used with coaxial cables for many types of electronic signals. The connectors are easily differentiated through the use of color, as follows: Color Use Signal Type white or black Audio left channel analog red Audio right channel, also see HDTV analog yellow Video Composite analog green HDTV Components Y Luminance with sync-on-green analog blue HDTV Components Cb/Pb Chroma analog red HDTV Components Cr/Pr Chroma analog orange/yellow Audio SPDIF digital Warning: It's possible to mix up audio SPDIF with composite video connectors, so please always consult your handbook for their proper connection and use. Use of color for SPDIF isn't always consistent, either. Furthermore, it's possible to switch the red HDTV connector with the right audio channel. HDTV components always appear in groups of three on device panels, so be sure to match them up with three-element cables and connectors. RCA connectors in various colors for different types of signals Two types of SPDIF (Digital audito): an RCA/coax connector on the left, and a TOSLINK (optical fiber) on the rigth TOSKLINK connector for optical delivery using fiber optic cable for digital SPDIF signals An adapter from SCART to RCA connectors (Composite-Video, 2x audio, and S-Video) Glossary RCA = Radio Corporation of America SPDIF = Sony/Philips Digital Interfaces

  • The second shot at 1394, the b version, with speeds of up to 800 MBit/s on copper cables and up to 3200 MBit/s using optical fibers, was more than ever overdue - not least because in contrast to its predecessor it also allows cable lengths previously known only to LAN technologies such as Ethernet. But although Lucent announced an IEEE 1394b chipset back in November 1999, it took until 2004 before IEEE 1394b finally became available - with chips from Texas Instruments. The reason was that the U.S. standardization committee IEEE only approved the final 1394b specification at the end of 2003. Apple launched the first 1394b-capable products onto the market just over half a year ago: Besides its G5 computers and the new successor generations of i- and e-Macs, as well as in the current i-Books and Power Books, the first high-speed FireWire cards for (Windows) PCs are at last available. Trust and Unibrain are already delivering their cards based on the same Texas Instruments chip. Although announced in April 2004, Adaptec's is due in the coming weeks. FireWire cards are generally delivered without drivers as Windows already provides its own. At Microsoft, IEEE1394 is a component of the Serial Bus Protocol 2 (SPB-2), while the driver is part of the OHCI Protocol Stack (Open Host Controller Interface). The Microsoft Windows XP operating system currently contains no dedicated drivers for IEEE 1394b. A Microsoft employee provided us with the following statement: "We have never supported 1394b. It ran under certain conditions on Windows XP and Windows XP SP1. The problem we are confronted with is that OHCI 1.0 and OHCI 1.1 do not support the speed code (0x3). This is a reserved value in the OHCI specification we support that cannot be used." The Microsoft employee [whose name is known to us] thus confirms the claim of Unibrain that whenever an IEEE 1394b device is connected the throughput sinks to the minimum allowed by the 1394 bus: In the IEEE1394 standard the speed classes such as S100 and S800 are synonymous for signaling rates in MBit/s. Microsoft maintains its Windows XP Service Pack 2 includes drivers for IEEE 1394b. But according to our tests using the Release Candidate 2 prior to the Service Pack 2's launch earlier this month, a 1394b device's speed dips to a measly 100 MBit/s. Our source told us: "What are we doing? Things become problematic when you start mixing 1394a and 1394b devices. If we ignore OHCI conformity and bump up the speed to 800 MBit/s the old devices down tools. If we set the speed to S100, all devices start enumerating and working. It was a tough decision but we have little room for maneuver if we don't want to dispense with 1394b support."

  • Logitech QUICKCAM ORBIT MECHANICAL PAN180... (2 offers) Online shop Price computersandnetworks $136.96 Amazon Marketplace $139.95 See more products So if you get the Orbit in the right position opposite your face and don't disturb it, face-tracking works perfectly. Once you are in the field of view, your face stays on screen. There is also an automatic zoom function to adjust the distance from the face to keep it completely in the frame. You can deactivate this if you like. If you do use it, you should stay a good way away because the zoom is digital and degrades the image a bit. Apart from it being really good fun - you never tire of seeing how the camera follows you and you can't help thinking of Hal in 2001 A Space Odyssey - being able to chat with your hands free is a definite upside. Seeing a talker in close-up gives a whole new dimension to videoconferencing. Webcams And Broadband Make Good Bedfellows Being able to see and hear the person you are talking to and getting their facial expressions and tone of voice helps you understand better. This is why, after inventing the telephone, humans have dreamt of adding images to it. In the early 1980s, France Telecom made some attempts at video telephony in Biarritz. The idea then was to transmit a signal combining sound and video via optic fibers. While the experiment has not yet revolutionized our phoning habits, the Internet has. Anybody now can talk to and see the person on the other end of the line, even if they are on the opposite side of the world. All you need is an internet connection and a Webcam. There was a time when there seemed to be little point in such things because of slow STN (Switched Telephone Network) connections, poor quality video and high call costs. But now, since the spread of broadband packages (ADSL or cable) and the drop in the price of Webcamssome Webcams now cost less than $10 - the cost of both equipment and calls continues to go down as quality goes up.