Ads
Ads
All about Internal Storage
 Latest Internal Storage articles
Laptop Storage: 640GB And 500GB Drives From WD And Fujitsu

Laptop Storage: 640GB And 500GB Drives From WD And Fujitsu
We're looking at two new notebook hard drives today: Fujitsu’s 500GB 2.5" disk and WD’s brand new 640GB 2.5" model (the largest notebook drive you can buy). The capacities on both products are outstanding, but neither drive is completely perfect. Read More

All Internal Storage articles

Newsletters


  • Ask your question about IT issues
  • Post

Partners

The Games selection

violent : More Mindless Violence Basic shooting game, but still so powerful! Use the mouse to take aim and shoot at the little beasties before they get to you. Use Space to reload....
crazy : Interactive Boogy Pick one of the 3 songs, hit on the correct keys matching this boy's dance moves.
Ads

Sponsored links

OCZ Unveils PCIe-Based SSD Card

Next news
2:11 PM - April 24, 2009 by Kevin Parrish

OCZ announced today its Z-Drive, a PCI-Express based solid state drive that offers up to 1 TB of storage.

OCZ Technology first introduced the new Z-Drive PCI-Express SSD at the CeBIT 2009 expo held in Germany this past February, representing the company's latest premium solid state storage solution using the highly-fast PCI-Express interface (x4). The Z-Drive offers an onboard RAID controller, 256 MB of onboard cache, comes in three different capacities, and a MTBF of at least 1.5 million hours. The Z-Drive is also compatible with a wide range of operating systems including Windows XP (32 and 64), Windows 7 (32 and 64), and even Mac OS X 10.

“It is our goal to deliver tailored SSD solutions for the complete spectrum of high performance applications,” said Eugene Chang, Vice President of Product Management at the OCZ Technology Group. “Designed for ultra high performance consumers, the Z-Drive takes the SATA bottleneck out of the equation by employing the ultra fast PCI-Express architecture with a RAID controller and four Vertex controllers configured in four-way RAID 0 within an all-in-one product, making this solution ideal for applications that put a premium on both storage performance and maximum capacity.”

The Z-Drive's three capacity offerings include 250 GB, 500 GB, and 1 TB. The 250 GB version offers reads speeds up to 450 MB/s, write speeds up to 300 MB/s, and a sustained write speed up to 200 MB/s. The 500 GB version is the fastest SSD of the bunch, providing read speeds up to 510 MB/s, and write speeds up to 480 MB/s; it too also has sustained write speeds up to 200 MB. As for the 1 TB version, its read speed is a bit slower, accessing data up to 500 MB/s. It also sports write speeds up to 470 MB/s, and a 200 MB/s sustained write speed as well. The overall dimensions of all three Z-Drive versions are 245mm x 124mm x 22mm, although the drive looks thick enough to take up two slots. There's also a fan on the bottom of the SSD to keep things nice and cool.

"Z-Drives feature exceptional speeds all while delivering lowered power consumption, ultra-fast data access, superior durability, and lower cost per ownership compared to conventional hard drives when factoring in the need for multiple drives and a separate RAID controller," the company said.

Although consumers can purchase OCZ products through online retailers including Tiger Direct, Newegg, eCost, CompUSA, and more, the Z-Drive was not available for purchase at the time of this writing. However, the OCZ Vertex Series 120 GB SSD for the SATA II interface costs around $370 USD, so it may be safe to assume that the 250 GB version of the Z-Drive PCI-Express SSD may be a bit higher in price. Still, with the super fast performance provided by the PCI-e interface and SSD technology, the price may very well be worth it.

Source : Tom's Hardware US

Talkback
Add your comment
joebob2000 04/24/2009 8:45 PM
Hide
-11+

But, they didn't answer the all important question...

WILL IT BLEND!

Ooops, sorry, my mistake...

WILL IT BOOT! Can this thing finally provide me with the instant-on experience I crave from my PC while still allowing me to turn it off each night to conserve power?

snotling 04/24/2009 8:46 PM
Hide
-3+

a low profile drive would have made it great for blade servers...

jpdykes 04/24/2009 8:48 PM
Hide
-3+

Exactly what I was wondering joebob.

I just want my desktop.... now!

NocturnalOne 04/24/2009 9:01 PM
Hide
-0+

Hmm, the RAID thing throws a bit of a wrench in the numbers. I assume the capacity is listed as non-mirrored but performance with mirroring? I suppose they could do striping but striping over what? The implementation already depends on many discrete flash chips so in effect you're always striping.

Anyway, this is exciting stuff. I think they'd find a market for smaller units as well. It doesn't take *that* much room to have a full windows or other OS install. Just keep your most favorite apps and data on flash and the rest on HD. Come to think of it, my astro photo application PixInsight would really benefit from putting swap files on this thing.

gwolfman 04/24/2009 9:04 PM
Hide
-2+

They should have gone with a PCIe x8 slot instead!

halcyon 04/24/2009 9:05 PM
Hide
-2+

I think THG's initial article on it said that it is not bootable.

mrubermonkey 04/24/2009 9:17 PM
Hide
-0+

I/O was never very good on those Vertex drives. I wonder how it will be on this Z-Drive.

mrubermonkey 04/24/2009 9:18 PM
Hide
-1+

Also is it PCI Express 2.0 x4 or PCI Express 1.1 x4?

Spanky Deluxe 04/24/2009 9:23 PM
Hide
-4+

mrubermonkey :
Also is it PCI Express 2.0 x4 or PCI Express 1.1 x4?



It really doesn't matter. Even PCI Express 1.1 x4 gives a maximum throughput of 1000MB/s, roughly double the maximum throughput of these drives.

tweak13 04/24/2009 9:37 PM
Hide
-4+

Ok TomsHardware get one and test test test and post a review!

DO IT NOW!

PREASE!

vgdarkstar 04/24/2009 10:11 PM
Hide
-0+

IOPS?
Will it boot?
Pricing?

ShadowFlash 04/24/2009 10:22 PM
Hide
-4+

I sense a fusion IO vs. Z-drive article in the near future......I'm still confident that the fusion will provide better IO, but capacity goes to OCZ with lower price points.

My opinion is that this is just a "gimmick" item anyhow.
“Designed for ultra high performance consumers, the Z-Drive takes the SATA bottleneck out of the equation....."
Yeah....I doubt that. It's still just a good controller card with individual drives on a sata interface in pretty packaging, not that it matters, as a single SSD cannot (yet) max out a SATA channel ( Intel X25-E's are getting close though ) thus having no such "SATA bottleneck". Any enthusiast or IT pro worth there weight in salt could easily custom build these with mid to high end controllers supporting more than just 4 drives and not sacrificing a valuable double wide PCI-E slot in the process.
With that being said, it does have a "coolness factor" along with a 1TB capacity that could make it appealing to those who prefer to buy instead of build.
Anything that moves SSD technology forward gets a "thumbs up" in my book. In fact, I count on "early adopters" to buy things like this to lower the price of future generation solutions.

Curnel_D 04/24/2009 11:11 PM
Hide
-0+

"Today"? I know for a fact that statement is completely false.

pharge 04/24/2009 11:19 PM
Hide
-1+

"The Z-Drive is also compatible with a wide range of operating systems including Windows XP (32 and 64), Windows 7 (32 and 64), and even Mac OS X 10." hmmm... how about VISTA? lol

Wondering how much will it be for a 1 TB Z-drive and how much power will it dran.

thepinkpanther 04/25/2009 12:42 PM
Show
maigo 04/25/2009 3:54 AM
Hide
--1+

Why? Just WHY?

scryer_360 04/25/2009 5:58 AM
Hide
--1+

Hmmm, missing something here. Isn't the SATA interface faster than the PCIe we are looking at? What makes this so cheap and so fast?

Tindytim 04/25/2009 6:24 AM
Hide
--1+

I don't understand the "instant" boot idea.

But maybe that's because I have GRUB, and if I want to boot into XP or Vista I have to use the Longhorn bootloader after GRUB.

Crazy-PC 04/25/2009 11:24 AM
Hide
-0+

I am not sure how this PCI-E SSD work in RAID 0, seems the motherboard should with at least 3 PCI-E x16 port where 2 for the PCI-E SSD for Raid 0 and only 1 for display card lol.

Anonymous 04/25/2009 1:25 PM
Hide
-0+

Amazing 1Gb a second.True HD must be near.Just imagine a 3 meter (10 feet) monitor

rambo117 04/25/2009 8:43 PM
Hide
-0+

wow!! that thing is GOREGEOUS!
imagine putting two of those in RAID....
*drools*

Harby 04/25/2009 8:47 PM
Hide
-0+

scryer_360 :
Hmmm, missing something here. Isn't the SATA interface faster than the PCIe we are looking at? What makes this so cheap and so fast?



Of course sata is slower. Thats why its not use for such a device.

Sata 3Gb/s (gigabits) translates into about 300MB/s. So this thing would be severely bottlenecked and couldn't even remotely reach its max transfer capabilities.

ShadowFlash 04/25/2009 9:33 PM
Hide
-1+

Harby :
Of course sata is slower. Thats why its not use for such a device.Sata 3Gb/s (gigabits) translates into about 300MB/s. So this thing would be severely bottlenecked and couldn't even remotely reach its max transfer capabilities.



that is a per channel limit, and my belief is this card DOES use the SATA interface for the individual SSD's. No such bottleneck exists right now other than the PCI-E x4 bus itself. You apparently are thinking that this is of similar design and construction to the IO fusion drive, which I am relatively certain it's not, hence the controller card functions. It only makes sense that they would use there existing line of SSD's in this hidden under a pretty cover. I'de be willing to bet it you opened it up, you would find 4 SSD's mounted to a controller card on SATA interfaces. They're just attempting clever marketing. I hope I'm wrong, but I seriously doubt it.

zdzichu 04/26/2009 12:22 PM
Hide
-0+

What about most important parameter, namely I/O Operations per second number?

XepherZenith 04/26/2009 8:26 PM
Hide
-0+

250GB = $2000
500GB = $3000
1TB = $5000
Avalible around middle of May.
These are the price and release date in Japan, don't know about USA.

anamaniac 04/27/2009 9:04 AM
Hide
-0+

1TB SSD with a 200 MB write and 500 MB read...
Sounds oh so nice, but I think I might as well raid as many 80 gigs as I can. :)
For that price (assuming the previously stated $5000), I could do a 90+ 80GB HDD raid monster! (ignoring power bills)

I still want it regardless, largely for a simple single-card solution SSD 1TB.

Tindytim 04/27/2009 10:01 AM
Hide
-0+

anamaniac :
I could do a 90+ 80GB HDD raid monster! (ignoring power bills)I still want it regardless, largely for a simple single-card solution SSD 1TB.


It would just be idiotic to put 90 drives in a RAID 0. A Large RAID 6 array with RAID 1 triplets would make more sense. That way, 9 drives would have to fail in a pretty short period for any data loss, versus the 1 drive that would cause you to loose your data.

tipoo 04/27/2009 4:09 PM
Hide
-0+

Review it then send me the review sample. K thanks.

dark_lord69 04/27/2009 5:32 PM
Hide
-0+

OK, now we just need to figure out a way to make it the bootable drive. I would LOVE to have one of these babies! Far too spendy though. I have a hard enough time trying to convince my fiance to let me buy a nice power supply (since mine was over 7 yrs old and only 300 watts).

jacobdrj 04/27/2009 7:49 PM
Hide
-0+

Input. We need more input. Johnny 5 needs more input...

Comments are closed on this page.

Sponsored links

Related articles

  • Flash SSD Update: More Results, Answers

    Acknowledging that our initial article on the efficiency of Flash SSDs was based on an inaccurate test procedure for battery runtime, we looked at more SSDs and HDDs. Our conclusion, however, was not far off, as Flash SSDs can do much better.

  • The SSD Power Consumption Hoax

    Manufacturers tout the power savings of flash-based solid state drives compared to conventional hard drives. True? Check out our notebook battery tests.

  • Does Power-Saving Technology Kill SSD Performance?

    Processor speed matters. We found that a fast solid state disk drive, such as Intel’s X25-E, can be greatly impaired by a system running with all of its CPU’s power saving features turned on. Surprised? Read our full analysis for the specifics.