Office 2010 to Make Itself Faster With Your GPU
Now you can justify getting Crossfire for work.
Office 2010 will be hitting next month and with it will come GPU acceleration of your productivity software. While we won't be seeing HDR effects in your Word processor, Office 2010 will harness some of your GPU to make the graphical effects less intensive on the CPU.
AMD blogged about this very topic yesterday, pointing out the system requirements of Office 2010 lists this: Use of graphics hardware acceleration requires DirectX 9.0c compatible graphics card with 64 MB or higher video memory.
With that, you can expect the following whiz-bang hotness from Office 2010:
- Transform images into compelling, vibrant visuals using new and improved picture editing features such as color saturation and temperature, brightness and contrast, and advanced cropping and background removal tools, along with artistic filters such as blur, paintbrush, and watercolor.
- New slide transitions and animation effects that look similar to graphics you’d see on TV.
- Dozens of additional SmartArt layouts to create many types of graphics such as organization charts, lists, and picture diagrams.
- The ability to turn presentations into high-quality videos with narration to share with virtually anyone through e-mail, via the Web, or on DVD.
- Embed and edit video files directly in PowerPoint 2010. Easily trim your video to show only relevant sections and apply a variety of video styles and effects—such as reflections, bevels, and 3-D rotation
While the new effects may not be groundbreaking, any time that the system can offload some of the work from the CPU onto the GPU (if it's better for the job) is a good thing.
- Microsoft Windows,
- Microsoft,
- AMD,
- ATI,
- Nvidia,
- office ,
- 2010 ,
- word ,
- powerpoint ,
- gpu
- Microsoft Opens Windows 7 Restaurant in Taiwan
- The Pirate Party Brings the Pirate Bay Back Online
- OCZ's Fatal1ty Modular PSU Does 750W
- BFG Tech: We're Done with Graphics Cards
- Deals for May 18: 15.4'' HP dv6 Quad Core i7 $799
- Lian Li Launches Slick Gaming Mid-Towers
- 10 Years Later, Romero Apologizes for Daikatana
- StarCraft II Beta Ending; BlizzCon Tickets Soon
- Mach Xtreme Tech's 1.8'' SDDs Mirror NES Carts
- Deals for May 19: HP Laptop (Incl. ENVY) Bonanza
- Yahoo! Acquires an Army of 380,000 Writers
- Samsung, Toshiba, Etc Fined For Price Fixing
- Microsoft Takes Cues from Gmail with New Hotmail
- Report: Sony Launching $70 PSN Premium at E3
- 'Wireless' 2Mbps Internet Using Blinking LEDs
- Microsoft Warns of Win 7 Graphics Security Hole
- Intel Confirms 25nm NAND Flash for New SSDs
- MSI SketchBook Dual-Sided with Keyboard, Tablet








Well i don't normally use Word for graphical presentations but i guess it's good for anybody looking for a nice speedup when you have a bunch of things in the doc.
Or you can keep your version of office that you already have and buy an SSD "It is the same price" - Ron White
As long as we can disable it
Sheesh, I remember when 486 made office blazing fast. Things just keep on improving.
As long as we can disable it
Um, why? It's not like you're going to need that GPU for anything that can't spare a little processing power at the the same time that you're putting together a presentation.
I'm guessing this will be useless for now. Still good that they're trying.
Is it just me, or does it look like they are trying to square off with Adobe? Half that feature list seems to be a new market segment for Office.
EDIT: Not sure why I got a thumbs down, but at what point did MS start dealing with graphic editing tools more sophisticated than paint? Admittedly, we still use 2k3 where I work, but there is no real editing of images in there. Mostly resizing and whatnot just to jam it into a PowerPoint. Traditionally, most graphic work has been Adobe's turf..
are we going to see benchmarks of nvidia and ati's latest cards comparing performance? LOL
As we get into the future you're going to see many more applications starting to use the gpu when they can. Get used to it, it's a nice feature!
It's pretty obvious some of you don't use Microsoft Office in an office or professional environment. I am already thinking of ways I can jazz up my next presentation. They should have been implementing some kind of acceleration years ago.
Or you can keep your version of office that you already have and buy an SSD "It is the same price" - Ron White
Or you can keep your current drive and buy some drugs and hookers.
Well i don't normally use Word for graphical presentations but i guess it's good for anybody looking for a nice speedup when you have a bunch of things in the doc.
Are you kidding? Since when does a word processor need GPU acceleration? Is Office that inefficient? I can see MAYBE needing GPU number-crunching in a HUGE spreadsheet but if you're doing that kind of analysis then it's probably the wrong application for the job.
Now useless douches from Marketing can run their retarded PowerPoint transitions at TWICE the speed!
Are you kidding? Since when does a word processor need GPU acceleration? Is Office that inefficient? I can see MAYBE needing GPU number-crunching in a HUGE spreadsheet but if you're doing that kind of analysis then it's probably the wrong application for the job.
The acceleration they are talking about is certain video and picture rendering that used to be all done with the CPU they decided to start accessing you GPU's power. Now how much will this speed it up probably nothing noticeable on anything with a core 2 processor and up.
It really just sounds to me like they are trying to find a reason to make people think they need to upgrade to office 2010 when in reality not much has changed.
Ill believe it when I see it. When I use office I use it to prepare a presentation, do a report, produce graphs and tables, show me where in the last 10 or so years that office has needed more power from dual core or GPU acceleration. Its just more marketing gimmiks to try and get you to drop a stupid amount of money on something you don't need. Since office "changed" I've jumped ship to open office due to lectures doing documents in Docx which olderversions didn't support. Plus office only has two installs and it throws out random formatting errors between older versions. I don't see the point in spashing ÂŁ70+ on software when open office IMO is better and free.
The acceleration they are talking about is certain video and picture rendering that used to be all done with the CPU they decided to start accessing you GPU's power. Now how much will this speed it up probably nothing noticeable on anything with a core 2 processor and up.It really just sounds to me like they are trying to find a reason to make people think they need to upgrade to office 2010 when in reality not much has changed.
How much REALLY changes between versions of Office? Aesthetically, 2010 is an upgrade. There are a lot of new tools that could make it worthwhile, the new printing menus for one. But you know, many enterprise customers can upgrade this for free as they pay year to year licensing.
While I get your point, it's obviously about balance and Office is unlikely to put the same strain on a system as your average game would. I mean, what's the point of GPU if the CPU sits idle. Of course, described new features (especially video editing) are very demanding applications which welcome the GPU support.
You people really need to think clearly.
Using a dedicated, specialized processor that can finish work 1000 (not exaggerated) times faster or 1000 times more work in the same time.
While offloading a bunch of work from the main processor, is a very good thing. It's a much bigger improvement then that ribbon UI thing ever will be, ribbon is introduced in MS Office 2007.
Haven't you noticed the new stuff: animations, effects.
Most of those things just ARE NOT POSSIBLE on Cpu's.
There is also something called DirectWrite for rendering characters, text with GPU.
Probably also useful for word processors don't you think.
MS Office should make every visible, visual thing GPU-rendered/accelerated.
This can make MS Office very fast, responsive with large workloads.
This should have been done a long time ago.
From an engineering standpoint it's much more efficient.
You people really need to think clearly. Using a dedicated, specialized processor that can finish work 1000 (not exaggerated) times faster or 1000 times more work in the same time. While offloading a bunch of work from the main processor, is a very good thing. It's a much bigger improvement then that ribbon UI thing ever will be, ribbon is introduced in MS Office 2007. Haven't you noticed the new stuff: animations, effects. Most of those things just ARE NOT POSSIBLE on Cpu's. There is also something called DirectWrite for rendering characters, text with GPU. Probably also useful for word processors don't you think. MS Office should make every visible, visual thing GPU-rendered/accelerated. This can make MS Office very fast, responsive with large workloads. This should have been done a long time ago. From an engineering standpoint it's much more efficient.
And when you send this new jazzed up document to a client with a traditional business PC they can't open it properly.
It might be more efficient from an engineering standpoint, but from an interoperability IT standpoint it is blazingly stupid.
Oh great, now all new GPU reviews or announcements are going to have the obligatory comment: "Yeah, but can it accellerate Office 2010?"
Great!
Sometimes when I'm typing up a meaty story, with spellcheck on, and I use a powerful adjective I get a slight stutter as my framerate drops under 30FPS. Good to see they are doing something about this.
All this tells me is that MS Office is so bloated it needs additional horsepower to get running in a snappy fashion. Sorry MS I will never fork over money for your Office Suit. Open Office does just fine and is supported on all three platforms, Linux, OS X and Windows.
And when you send this new jazzed up document to a client with a traditional business PC they can't open it properly.It might be more efficient from an engineering standpoint, but from an interoperability IT standpoint it is blazingly stupid.
Actually, you're assuming way too much. The GPU functionality seems to only apply to the document creation aspects - not the readability of the document. It's blazingly stupid to then take those assumptions and start speculating on interoperability without any more knowledge, FYI.
Oh great, now all new GPU reviews or announcements are going to have the obligatory comment: "Yeah, but can it accellerate Office 2010?"
Shhh.. Don't give them any ideas
Oh great, now all new GPU reviews or announcements are going to have the obligatory comment: "Yeah, but can it accellerate Office 2010?"
This is already happening with the desktop Aero functions, which is very similar to the functions in Office 2010. It's not a big deal, nor should you really care what marketing you see on the boxes.
This is good news. In many cases I use vectored graphics in Word that come from CAD packages and if they are very detailed Word is very slow in redrawing (I'm talking hundreds of thousands of lines). Hopefully the use of the GPU will speed things up. Nice one.
Just what we need. Another bloated buggy office version that's overpriced, and introduces new proprietary file formats. Wake me up when Microsoft produces something worth buying.
Um, why? It's not like you're going to need that GPU for anything that can't spare a little processing power at the the same time that you're putting together a presentation.
um, I'm thinking the opposite, just imagine outlook 2010 running in the background as you fire up a game...
Can't wait to see this in action on a laptop. A lot of my powerpoint slides contain animated gifs, or movies because it is the only way to explore time-dependent 3-D results. My powerpoint presentations are often at 50 MB or more in size. I use 2007 and my laptop works very hard to handle the graphical presentations.
um, I'm thinking the opposite, just imagine outlook 2010 running in the background as you fire up a game...
Why is it that most negative comments always come before someone bothers to think about a solution? The Aero desktop releases its hooks into the GPU when you start a game - take that knowledge, and think for about 2 seconds.
If MSFT would use the GPU to help crunch my Excel worksheets, that would rock!