Researchers Build a Quantum System Without Cooling
Building a quantum computer is one of the big quests in physics today. It's a path littered with obstacles, but tiny milestones are achieved almost every day by researchers around the globe.
One major challenge may have been solved by Harvard scientists. The university reports that quantum bits (qubits) were created, sustained and their information stored at room temperature.
Typical quantum systems cannot be operated at room temperature. According to the Harvard researchers, such systems rely on a design that is capable of trapping an atom or electron in a vacuum and then cool the entire system to close to absolute zero. However, a paper published in the June 8 issue of Science claim that the scientists were able to leverage a pair of impurities in ultra-pure, laboratory-grown diamonds to create a quantum computer and store information in them for almost 2 seconds. That may not sound much, but represents an increase of nearly six orders of magnitude over the life span of earlier systems, Harvard stated.
"What we’ve been able to achieve in terms of control is quite unprecedented," physics professors Mikhail Lukin said. “We have a qubit, at room temperature, that we can measure with very high efficiency and fidelity. We can encode data in it, and we can store it for a relatively long time. We believe this work is limited only by technical issues, so it looks feasible to increase the life span into the range of hours. At that point, a host of real-world applications become possible."
For the first time, a research result promises that a quantum system could store data for expanded periods of time in real world conditions. What is missing, of course, is scale, which is what the scientists said they are working on now.

Bad engrish nevr seizes to emaze myself.
No...
no.
No...
no.
Science never seize to amaze me..
tell that to the church.
Bad engrish nevr seizes to emaze myself.
5000 x 1000000 = 5000000000
if addition is single instruction that would mean that cell phones use CPU capable of running at 5GHz. close but not quite there yet, even desktops are clocked under 5GHz
Modern processore are able to issue and complete 3 or 4 instructions in one clock cycle. This is for a single core processor. 2,4,6,8 ,12 core processors bring tthis number down even farther.
Simply put, you are wrong.
Clock speed is not the only factor determining compute power. Architecture of the chip has to be taken into account.
Place two chips together, same clock speed, and one outperforms the other, due to the Architecture of the chip.
And to be truthfull, even an Intel 4004 built in 1971, which is way more powerfull than the ENIAC by several factors, is minute in performance compared to a modern dual core smartphone.
Intel 4004 92kIPS (Or 92160 Instructions per second)
Qualcom Crait Dual Core 9.900 MIPS ( Or 12205670440 instructions per second)
So here is a Dual Core Mobile Chip running 12 BILLION instructions per minute at 1.5GHZ Way more than your incorrectly calculated 5 Billion Instructions linked to "5GHZ"
Source
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instructions_per_second
Let me rephrase that for you. It's facts and knowledge that try to belittle the Bible.
Last time I researched the 'sciences' of creation/Inteligent Design vs Evolution a few years ago I thought they were both full of crap. Evolution has huge gaping holes in it's various competing theories that are simply untestable, while young earth creationists try to rely solely on biblical text to fill in their holes instead of seeing if physical reality somehow lines up with what the bible says. And the worst part is that both camps are full of ignorant douche-bags who spread hate and ignorance while claiming to be enlightened. The only real science these days are coming form corporations; It seems a trend that any 'science' funded via a hot-button issue is merely fundraising for padding research budgets.
Since we're talking quantum computing, to answer your question... it already has.
Please compare a 3.0 GHz Ivy Bridge to a 3.0 GHz "dual" core HT Pentium 4 in CPU performance.