China develops new ultra-cold alloy that can reach -273°C without helium — could enable compact cooling for superconducting quantum chips, military equipment, and beyond

Microsoft Quantum materials
(Image credit: Microsoft)

Scientists from China have developed a new cooling technology based on a rare-earth alloy that can reach temperatures close to absolute zero without relying on helium-3, reports South China Morning Post. Such an alloy could enable compact, helium-3-free cooling systems for superconducting quantum chips, advanced electronics used by military equipment, and space applications.

The team built a compact, solid-state refrigeration module with no moving parts that reached 106 millikelvin (mK), which is -273°C, a temperature typically achieved using liquid helium. The cooling module relied on a rare-earth compound consisting of europium, cobalt, and aluminum (EuCo₂Al₉, ECA), which features thermal conductivity comparable to metals, but which can also cool itself and other components efficiently using adiabatic demagnetization (ADR), the method that does all the magic behind the discovery.

Article continues below

Historically, ADR has had a major weakness: the materials used could get cold themselves, but they were not very good at transferring that cold to other components. This limited their usefulness in real systems. Meanwhile, the EuCo₂Al₉ compound developed by the team of scientists does just that: it can cool itself and other components, making helium-3-free cooling systems capable of cooling components to nearly absolute zero temperatures possible.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Anton Shilov
Contributing Writer

Anton Shilov is a contributing writer at Tom’s Hardware. Over the past couple of decades, he has covered everything from CPUs and GPUs to supercomputers and from modern process technologies and latest fab tools to high-tech industry trends.

  • Faiakes
    So could this be applied to PC cooling?
    Reply
  • coolitic
    micheal_15 said:
    deleted
    I would say that my reason for doubting chiefly stems from the fact that this "discovery" was announced just two weeks after DARPA announced their push. That's a little too convenient to not be engineered.

    That being said, it's likely that their research had already undergone some degree of progress, and their announcement was a fluffed up reflection of that to score a point against the US. So I'm not discarding anything completely here, but it's kind of impossible to tell to what degree it's true or not, as is typical w/ China.

    So, as per usual, I'll believe it when it exists in a functioning product.
    Reply
  • chaos215bar2
    So, do we have a published paper explaining exactly how the cooling process using this new alloy works, or just a news article from a Chinese source specifically calling out DARPA?

    The big problem that comes to mind is, how does this alloy dissipate heat without dumping some of it into the object intended to be cooled? With a standard helium cryostat, this is simple enough and not fundamentally that different from the standard refrigeration cycle. (Well, it's pretty different, but the helium carries the heat away, just like any refrigerant would.)

    Can this alloy selectively dump its heat in one direction? Or was the test just a one off, capable of briefly reaching the desired temperatures but not necessarily maintaining them over any period of time?
    Reply
  • TCA_ChinChin
    micheal_15 said:
    delete

    coolitic said:
    I would say that my reason for doubting chiefly stems from the fact that this "discovery" was announced just two weeks after DARPA announced their push. That's a little too convenient to not be engineered.

    chaos215bar2 said:
    So, do we have a published paper explaining exactly how the cooling process using this new alloy works, or just a news article from a Chinese source specifically calling out DARPA?
    Here is the article published in Nature:
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10144-zThe news source is kinda bad for not linking the actual published paper, but it's real research and actually legitimately in one of the most prestigious scientific journals globally.
    Reply
  • Geef
    I added this story to my post:
    List of stories with the 'CLAIMS' and 'COULD BE' or 'MAY.'
    Reply
  • chaos215bar2
    TCA_ChinChin said:
    Here is the article published in Nature:
    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-026-10144-zThe news source is kinda bad for not linking the actual published paper, but it's real research and actually legitimately in one of the most prestigious scientific journals globally.
    Too bad there doesn't seem to be a plain PDF copy available anywhere.

    I guess it's a little harder to complain since the research was funded within China, but still, the idea of paying $30+ simply to access a single scientific paper is so counter to the kind of open communication scientific progress thrives on, it's almost insulting.
    Reply
  • TheOtherOne
    They could probably go even lower, if they added Copium into the mix! 😉
    Reply
  • TCA_ChinChin
    chaos215bar2 said:
    Too bad there doesn't seem to be a plain PDF copy available anywhere.

    I guess it's a little harder to complain since the research was funded within China, but still, the idea of paying $30+ simply to access a single scientific paper is so counter to the kind of open communication scientific progress thrives on, it's almost insulting.
    I mean its Nature's policy, take it up with them. If you really want a PDF copy, often you can just ask the authors directly and many are willing to freely provide a copy. I imagine they just didn't bother putting it on free hosting websites since they are China based.
    Reply