
The older versions of the PhysX engine remain installed in the system and are displayed in the driver's information section.
The card's small fan, which is lit by blue LEDs, is barely audible during normal operation. Since the card is built like an AGP card, the components and its fan are turned downward in the case once installed. In our second test setup, the Ageia card was mounted vertically, producing an unpleasant whir from the fan.
Performance And Power Consumption
Of course, the big question is whether the Ageia card really does unburden the CPU from the physics calculations. The answer here is both yes and no. With a PhysX card installed, more details are visible in Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter. These additional details are calculated by the PPU and don't create more load for the CPU. However, the downside is that these added effects also have to be rendered by the graphics card, which taxes performance, albeit marginally. In short, more details equal lower frame rates. We ran the performance test on two platforms to determine what kind of impact, either positive or negative, physics acceleration has on overall performance. In both cases, we saw only a minor performance hit.
Performance test Ageia PhysX card with Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter (1024x768, max.)
| Intel 2.4 GHz, GeForce 6800 GT | Average | Minimum | Maximum |
|---|---|---|---|
| With PhysX Card | 17.3 fps | 11 fps | 20 fps |
| Without PhysX Card | 17.7 fps | 14 fps | 20 fps |
| Intel Dual Core 3.1 GHz, Radeon 1900 XTX | Average | Minimum | Maximum |
|---|---|---|---|
| With PhysX Card | 55.7 fps | 42 fps | 67 fps |
| Without PhysX-Card | 58.3 fps | 49 fps | 67 fps |
We measured the card's power consumption in the more powerful system based on the dual-core Intel processor and the Radeon X1900 XTX. The card increases the system's overall power consumption by 40 watts. These measurements represent peak values.
Power Consumption of Ageia's PhysX Card
| Intel Dual Core 3.1 GHz, Radeon 1900 XTX | 2D-Windows | 3D-Action |
|---|---|---|
| With PhysX Card | 185 watts | 390 watts |
| Without PhysX Card | 146 watts | 350 watts |
- Ageia Physx card or similar PPUs, still worth considering? [Graphic & Displays]
- AGEIA PPU still working?? [Graphic & Displays]
- "I hope nVidia didnt pay alot for Ageia" [Graphic & Displays]
- Ageia PPU 128 MB card on it way, how do i use? [Graphic & Displays]
- Ageia physx [Graphic & Displays]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- Killer NIC , Killer K1 worht the money?
- Athlon 7750 BE (Kuma) - Worth buying ?
- A glimpse at the difficulties of multi threading
- Medal of Honor Airborne Install Error
- MOH Airborne Install/Restart Problem
- Anyone runnin' a PhysX Ageia in their rig? To use, or not to use!
- help on overclocking my new system
- help on overclocking ???
- help with a q6600 set-up
- O/C Marathon Day 4 - Bangs and Bucks
- PC9600, PC8500 worth the price?
- ATI 4870 X2 What motherboard?
- ASUS Maximus Extreme audio issue
- Will there be enough space on my motherboard?
- ageia physx card
- pci card ageia physx
- possible to install physx card without
- what does a processing device do
- physx instaler radeon
- physx ghost recon 2 error
- ghost recon advanced warfighter securom
- physx card drivers
- ppu physic
- testing ageia physics card
- physx performance hit
- power physx card
- pc power consumption values
- install physx on radeon graphic cards
- physx for intel graphic cards
Partners
The Games selection
adventure :
Ray
Adventure game, South Park style. Pick the way the story goes by picking an answer among those offered.
|
crazy :
Interactive Boogy
Pick one of the 3 songs, hit on the correct keys matching this boy's dance moves.
|
