Partners
The Games selection
kids :
Bob
Throw bubbles so as to make the ones that appear in the game disappear. For this, use the Right / Left arrow keys to duck or move about, and the...
|
crazy :
PC Breakdown
What is worst than a Fatal Error occuring during a game you did not save? Unleash your rage at your PC in this game. Blow it to pieces, it feels so...
|
Sponsored links
Athlon 64 FX-57: Great Performance, High Price
Table of contents
- 1 – Athlon 64 FX-57 Brings More Speed, More Features
- 2 – San Diego Core Goes FX
- 3 – Finally, 90 nm Process And 300 mm Wafers
- 4 – AMD64 Processor Overview And Pricing
- 5 – What About Intel?
- 6 – Test Setup
- 7 – Benchmark Results
- 8 – Video
- 9 – Audio
- 10 – Applications
- 11 – Synthetic, Continued
- 12 – Conclusion: Raging Fast And Exorbitantly Expensive

Eight months have passed without any clock speed increases in AMD's Athlon 64 family. One reason why AMD stopped at 2.6 GHz certainly was that the 130 nm production process was reaching its limits. Another was the certainty that main competitor Intel had to operate even closer to the limits that its 90 nm process burdened the Pentium 4 family with, so there was less urgency for AMD to up speeds further. These circumstances will persist for a while, meaning that the FX-57 will basically compete only with its own predecessor.
This is the first product update that introduces new technology since the high-end FX offspring of the Athlon 64 family was introduced. While the preceding FX CPUs were based on the 130 nm Clawhammer core, FX-57 is a San Diego core product using a 90 nm process. It is expected to deliver more performance without pushing the thermal envelope any further.
Three 90 nm cores have been around for a while now. The Winchester was the first 90 nm part (512 kB L2 cache, up to 2.2 GHz at 67 Watts thermal design power) and actually managed to decrease heat dissipation at low and medium clock speeds. Today, Venice (512 kB) and San Diego (1 MB) are the cores of choice, since they not only replace the old Clawhammer and Newcastle cores, but also feature SSE3 extensions that are important to have for certain professional applications. In this context, it is pretty interesting to know that AMD derives several Athlon 64 and Athlon 64 FX models from these two cores.
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- Will HKMG make AMD superior?
- AMD Deneb Phenom II Reaches 6GHz
- Very bad news for everyones own personal "precious"
- AMD: Core i7 as being out of touch with the marketplace
- Extremely slow computer
- AMD 9950 BE OC Share Info
- AMD Athlon 64 6400+ Black ED. Overclock
- E4400 Overclock temperatures
- HT Link
- AMD AM2 6400+ Black Dual 3.2GHz
- DDR2 Selection Help
- Troubles with Gigabyte GA-MA78G-DS3H
- M2N-MX SE PLUS Memory Problems
- NOW I've done it - MicroStar MS-3969 MB won't post
