Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in

System Builder Marathon, May '09: $600 Gaming PC

System Builder Marathon, May '09: $600 Gaming PC
By

System Builder Marathon, May 2009: The Articles

Here are links to each of the four articles in this month’s System Builder Marathon (which we'll update as each story is published).

The SBM contest is live! Enter to win one of our three systems right here.

Introduction

As you've likely already read, the System Builder Marathon (SBM) series has returned this month with an added emphasis on portability. The idea here was to build machines that would be easier to cart around than the big boxes assembled in previous SBMs. Let’s take a look at the components that make up this month’s budget-gaming system.

$600 PC System Components

The process of choosing components given this Micro-ATX theme was very different since the performance impacting components is typically the first priority. But this month, since readers have expressed an interest in a “cube” system, searching for such an enclosure was the first order of business. Luckily, timing was right as there was a sale on a couple of Silverstone’s Sugo shoe-box style cases. Originally the $60 SG02-F was chosen, but the instant discount disappeared, bringing it within $10 of the SG01-F's retail price. Considering that the SG01-F has an additional exhaust fan, stepping up was an easy decision. We can’t factor this into the price, but there was a $20 rebate available making it an even better value at the time.

Component
Model
Price (U.S Dollar)
CPU
Intel Pentium E5200 2.5 GHz
$70
CPU Cooler
Intel Boxed Heatsink/Fan
$0
Motherboard
ASRock G41M-LE
$62
Ram
G.Skill HK 4 GB DDR2 800 (PC2 6400)
$41
Graphics
XFX GX260XADJF GeForce GTX 260 Core Edition Core 216 896 MB
$170
Hard Drives
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 ST3500418AS 500 GB
$60
Sound
Integrated
$0
Network
Integrated
$0
Case
SilverStone Sugo SG01-BF
$90
Power
OCZ Fatal1ty OCZ550FTY 550 W  Modular
$75
Optical
LITE-ON 22X DVD Burner SATA Model iHAS322-08 retail
$25
Total Price

$593


Since this is supposed to be a gaming box first and foremost, a main goal this month was to increase graphics muscle by taking advantage of lower GeForce GTX 260 prices. Space wasn’t much of a concern as both of these Silverstone cases can house up to a 12” graphics card, but the GeForce GTX 260 did send us looking for a name-brand power supply unit (PSU) with +12 V and at least 32 A of power. Extra power cables would clog up the already limited space, so a modular PSU is a must for this system. 

These were lofty goals, as meeting the above requirements already used up well over half the total $625 system budget. At this point, it looked likely that the budget would need to be raised to avoid sacrifices in 3D graphics power. There isn’t much room to save money on drives, and setting aside cash for a hard drive and optical drive left a little over $200 remaining for the motherboard, processor, cooler, and memory. There definitely was not going to be an opportunity to step up in CPU power this month, but going below the stellar $70 Pentium E5200 would be too huge a sacrifice to make. Lastly, we wanted the system to have 4 GB of high-performance RAM.

While selecting the graphics cards, CPU, and memory was easy enough, finding a Micro-ATX motherboard with solid overclocking capabilities was challenging and quite time consuming. The single Micro-ATX enthusiast Socket 775 motherboard that initially caught our attention was the DFI LP JR P45, based on the P45 chipset we know and love. But its $150 price tag at the time left us looking for a mainstream board instead. The problem was finding reviews of G43 or G45 chipset motherboards that would shine any light on overclocking capabilities. Even after searching enthusiast forums, we still had mixed feelings about the performance and value of G45 motherboards that retailed for $100 or more. 

Fortunately, a fellow member of the SBM team had heard good things about ASRock’s offerings. While I’ve had many good experiences with unique ASRock boards, such as the 939 Dual Sata II, I hadn’t considered the brand during this search. But a little research into the $62 ASRock G41M-LE left the impression that nothing short of the aforementioned DFI JR P45 stood out as truly superior for overclocking features and capabilities. The price was too good to be true, and allowed for a 500 GB hard drive, high-performance PC2-6400 memory, and even enough left over within our $625 budget to look at aftermarket CPU coolers.

A downside of a small enclosure is the limitations it puts on cooling the components within. None of the air coolers used in previous SBMs would come close to fitting in this small enclosure. Silverstone’s own NT06 Evolution was far too pricey and the search for a $25 low-profile cooler left much to be desired. The quiet $21 Arctic Cooling Freezer 7 LP was chosen because of its copper base and heatpipes, but a stocking issue at order time forced a change. While many readers may cringe at the thought, we instead opted for a sub-$600 build and gave the Intel boxed cooler a try this month. It’s now time to take a closer look at each of the components that make up the May 2009 $600 Gaming PC.     

Display 149 Comments.
Top Comments
  • 28 Hide
    dirtmountain , May 27, 2009 7:27 AM
    It is a lovely build, but the all around performance would be better with a Phenom2 x3 720, something that was achievable at the typical $625- $650 budget build price tag. If you look at the last 4 budget builds you get a E5200, E5300, E7300 and now yet another E5200. Give us a break, is the next one going to feature the E6300, then another E5200? As for the enthusiast, we get an i7, then a core2 duo, then a core2 quad, now another i7. Is it all around performance? or gaming performance? or just Intel performance? How can any reader know how the AMDs will stand up in these marathons if they never get the chance? With the new quarterly offering of the SBM it will be 3 months before another series comes out, just in time to see yet another i7, i5 and the E6300 builds. It's not as if the people waiting and wanting to see an AMD build are any surprise to Toms SBM or that they're disappointed to see AMD excluded once again. I'm disappointed myself even though Pauls build is a really nice one.
  • 21 Hide
    IronRyan21 , May 27, 2009 6:16 AM
    Im sad, I was hoping for at least one AMD cpu in the May SBM series. :( 
  • 11 Hide
    presidenteody , May 27, 2009 7:55 AM
    well, I hope Intel hasn't purchased tom's hardware yet.
Other Comments
  • 5 Hide
    doomtomb , May 27, 2009 6:07 AM
    You still manage to fit this PC with a GTX series at such a low price point. Props for that.
  • 3 Hide
    IzzyCraft , May 27, 2009 6:15 AM
    Yeah while you generally can find a 4890 10 dollars cheaper then a GTX275 the reverse is true when it comes to a 4870 and GTX260.

    Interesting i would have thought you would have went with a kuma due to limited oc ability in a cramped "gaming box", although you did make the oc worth while.

    I understand the rest of the build; though the case looks more like a media box then a gaming box those cramped boxes amaze and worry me as even my htpc is very well cooled and silent due to being very low heat as in not a oced cpu and a power hungry gpu.
  • 21 Hide
    IronRyan21 , May 27, 2009 6:16 AM
    Im sad, I was hoping for at least one AMD cpu in the May SBM series. :( 
  • 5 Hide
    IzzyCraft , May 27, 2009 6:25 AM
    62 dollar mobo hard to argue with that cpu+mobo coming out to be 62+70=$132 and, getting that much oc off the stock cooler.
  • -8 Hide
    dirtmountain , May 27, 2009 6:25 AM
    What a shame.
  • -8 Hide
    cinergy , May 27, 2009 6:29 AM
    IronRyan21Im sad, I was hoping for at least one AMD cpu in the May SBM series.


    Green eyed Tom gives no mercy for DAAMIT.
  • 6 Hide
    cangelini , May 27, 2009 6:44 AM
    Wow, no love for a solid build. Nicely done, Paul.
  • 1 Hide
    erdinger , May 27, 2009 7:20 AM
    dissapointed also just needed to see an Amd system.
  • 28 Hide
    dirtmountain , May 27, 2009 7:27 AM
    It is a lovely build, but the all around performance would be better with a Phenom2 x3 720, something that was achievable at the typical $625- $650 budget build price tag. If you look at the last 4 budget builds you get a E5200, E5300, E7300 and now yet another E5200. Give us a break, is the next one going to feature the E6300, then another E5200? As for the enthusiast, we get an i7, then a core2 duo, then a core2 quad, now another i7. Is it all around performance? or gaming performance? or just Intel performance? How can any reader know how the AMDs will stand up in these marathons if they never get the chance? With the new quarterly offering of the SBM it will be 3 months before another series comes out, just in time to see yet another i7, i5 and the E6300 builds. It's not as if the people waiting and wanting to see an AMD build are any surprise to Toms SBM or that they're disappointed to see AMD excluded once again. I'm disappointed myself even though Pauls build is a really nice one.
  • -7 Hide
    sandoness , May 27, 2009 7:37 AM
    Gah.. wouldn't it be smart to get a more powerful cpu?

    even with the overclocking power of this one?

    I was originally gonna get a q9550 !?

    :/ 

  • 1 Hide
    justjc , May 27, 2009 7:53 AM
    The explanation we have heard earlier, for he use of only Intel CPUs, is that Tom's Hardware base their builds on what hardware they have available. Why they don't have the money for a single Phenom II in their budget I don't know.

    The reason could offcause be that Intel gives a hefty rebate/will only deliver free chips, if AMD is left out of the builds, after all they have a history of such dealings ;)  (see rulings from the EU, Japan and South Korea)

    Perhaps we should start a collection and buy Tom's Hardware a couple of Phenom IIs, at least that would show if availability, of AMD CPUs, is the issue.
  • 11 Hide
    presidenteody , May 27, 2009 7:55 AM
    well, I hope Intel hasn't purchased tom's hardware yet.
  • 4 Hide
    manitoublack , May 27, 2009 7:58 AM
    Next SBM all the same price points, but 2 systems at each price-point. 1 AMD the other Intel. Settle it once and for all ;)  I know Tom's has spare cash. I'd guess you'd need to use the same graphics cards at each price-point, for a fair comparison.

    Another odd point is that after giving major props to the R770 in X-Fire for it's great value, to see that solution missing in a value shootout. That said space and X-fire compatibility was obviously an issue.

    Another great build, and look forward to seeing Junes take on value.

  • 5 Hide
    cangelini , May 27, 2009 8:07 AM
    justjcThe explanation we have heard earlier, for he use of only Intel CPUs, is that Tom's Hardware base their builds on what hardware they have available. Why they don't have the money for a single Phenom II in their budget I don't know. The reason could offcause be that Intel gives a hefty rebate/will only deliver free chips, if AMD is left out of the builds, after all they have a history of such dealings (see rulings from the EU, Japan and South Korea)Perhaps we should start a collection and buy Tom's Hardware a couple of Phenom IIs, at least that would show if availability, of AMD CPUs, is the issue.


    The way this works is simple. We cooperate with Newegg to make each System Builder Marathon happen. We have a budget and buy all of the hardware in each of these straight from Newegg. Most of the time, the configurations are selected based on feedback from the forums. We have something coming up next week for the folks who'd like to see some more AMD overclocking. But for this series, the Intel processors and Nvidia cards made the most sense given our respective price points.
  • 1 Hide
    anamaniac , May 27, 2009 8:17 AM
    Nice build.

    Micro-ATX for the win!

    A full size tower just wouldn't work for me. I have my cramped micro in a situation were it's already too big.
    Though I may go for a full-atx, and get a 10 foot mouse/keyboard/DVI/speaker cables, and throw it in my closet. :) 

    I'd like to see the cheapest gaming computer you cuold do and the performance though.
    Say, a AMD 5050e (for lower power consumption than kuma), micro atx, 4770 (over 4830 for power consumption), 250GB hdd etc.
    See how much muscle it has, how much power it uses, and how quiet you can make it. (extreme budget water cooling guide maybe?)
    I know I'd be interested in the results of that build, because rent is just too much. ;) 


    Thanks Toms.
  • -5 Hide
    kelfen , May 27, 2009 8:38 AM
    what about the 4770 for the win?
  • 0 Hide
    cangelini , May 27, 2009 9:09 AM
    Because these systems come from actual retail orders, we rely on hardware being available in order for it to appear here. The 4770 is not a good candidate.
  • 3 Hide
    Proximon , May 27, 2009 9:14 AM
    The best build of the bunch. That's a whole lot of value for 600 bucks.
    The only nit I have to pick is that the OCZ 550W is untested and possibly an inferior PSU, even for OCZ. It's larger sibling is decent, but it's clearly built by a different OEM. I doubt it's a BAD PSU though. Not like the junk a certain other site allows in their builds.
  • -1 Hide
    obarthelemy , May 27, 2009 9:19 AM
    On the $600 system, do you feel the performance is limited by the CPU, or by the vidcard ? I'm looking into getting a new PC, for around $800-900, and I was wondering if I should put a bit more money in the vidcard or the cpu (I'm getting bigger HD's for sure).
  • -1 Hide
    Sihastru , May 27, 2009 10:13 AM
    I know it's not in the budget, but for a build like this, I would go with the Silverstone SG-05 (with the bundled SFX PSU, very few choices there), Zotac 9300 mini-ITX WiFi, and keep the rest of the components with maybe the exception of the HDD where I only have eyes for the 640GB Western Digitals (Blue or Black, no green nonsense for me)...

    Now that would be impressively small and yet powerful.
Display more comments
React To This Article