- Overclocking Special: The Intel Pentium II 300 SL2W8
- AMD Moves onto the Overtaking Lane
- Big CPU Shoot Out: Intel Launches New Celeron with Mendocino Core...
- K6-2 Performance Guide
- Intel Roadmap Q3/98
- Intel Merced vs. Alpha 21264
- Intel's Pentium II Xeon Processor
- AMD's New K6-2 Processor
- How to Get All 66 MHz Slot 1 CPUs Running 100 MHz
- Intel's Slot 1 CPUs Uncovered
- AIRFLOW GUIDE - Case Airflow (corrected)
- Considering a Q6600 vs. my Pent D 940
- CPU random restarts/blocks WinXP OS2
- Collection of Conroe Data. (Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Extreme!)
- Core2 released, AMD tanks, AMD buys ATI 2 survive, ATI tanks
- CoolIt Freezone Mods?
- Input Needed
- Overclocking C2D and PCI-X, not PCI-E & memory speed
- Best AMD X2 / VGA Chipset?
- Overclocking P4?
D - CPU 3D Gaming Performance
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: cpu, performance, overview, q1
Syndication:
D - CPU 3D Gaming Performance
This time I used NVIDIA's RIVA TNT instead of 3Dfx's Voodoo2 for the Quake2-performance comparison chart. I did this because it is more valid when looking at other games than Quake 2. AMD has a special 3DNow!-patch for the combination of Quake2 and Voodoo2, but this patch does not exist for other games. Thus it's not really representative using the most ideal environment for K6-2.
For Intel CPUs I ran Quake2 3.20 , for AMD CPUs Quake2 3.19 with AMD's Quake2 patch for 3.19 , video mode '3Dnow! OpenGL' selected.

The same with overclocked CPUs:

This chart shows that the current Intel CPUs do still have the clear lead in 3D-gaming and I doubt that any hardcore gamer is really using K6-2. However, K6-2 is still sticking up pretty fine and can certainly be used for most 3D games out there just fine. Quake 2 at 1024x768 without a Voodoo2 is pretty tough with the K6-2 though.
- Previous page C - CPU Office Performance Under...
- Next page E - FPU Performance