Best offers
|
Radeon HD 5870 Video Card (1GB,... | $439.99 CDW.com More info |
|
GeForce GTX 295 Video Card (1.75GB,... | $549.99 Dell Home More info |
|
Radeon HD 5870 Video Card (1024MB,... | $455.99 CDW.com More info |
|
GeForce GTX 260 Video Card (896MB,... | $199.99 Newegg.com More info |
|
GeForce GTX 285 Video Card (1GB,... | $279.99 Best Buy More info |
- pcie x16 vs pcie 2.0
- pci express 1.0a
- x16 vs x16 2.0
- pci express x16 vs pci express x4
- crossfire pci express
- pci express 1x video
- pci express 1x graphics card
- pci express 1.0a 2.0
- upgrade to pci express 2.0
- pci express 1.0a x16
- hd3870 oc
- pci express x16 vs. pci express 2.0
- pci express x4 x8
- pci express vs. 2.0
- pci express 2.0 x4
Partners
The Games selection
action :
Yoyo the Star
Yoyo is a young girl who recently graduated and dreams to become a movie star (don't we all). You'll have to guide her on the path to stardom,...
|
kids :
Bob
Throw bubbles so as to make the ones that appear in the game disappear. For this, use the Right / Left arrow keys to duck or move about, and the...
|
Sponsored links
- Email |
- Print |
- Comment (1) |
- Share
To get right to the point, upgrading from PCI Express 1.x to 2.0 is not worthwhile right now. The current crop of graphics cards just doesn't tax the PCI Express bus enough for a difference to be visible. All test cards, across the board, showed a minor performance boost of 1 to 2 percent, with the HD2900 XT reaching better results despite the fact that it doesn't have a 2.0 interface. This improvement may be caused by the newer chipset or the higher memory speed. Also, a difference of 1 to 3 percent is also slim enough to be considered within the margin of error for testing.
| Single-Card Performance - HD3850 OC
(256 MB) PCIe 1.0a x16 vs 2.0 x16 |
fps | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| HD3850 (256 MB) OC PCIe 1.0a x16 | 1576.5 | 100.0 |
| HD3850 (256 MB) OC PCIe 2.0 x16 | 1612.4 | 102.3 |
| Single-Card Performance - HD3870 OC
(512 MB) PCIe 1.0a x16 vs 2.0 x16 |
fps | Percent |
| HD3870 (512 MB) OC PCIe 1.0a x16 | 1795.3 | 100.0 |
| HD3870 (512 MB) OC PCIe 2.0 x16 | 1828.6 | 101.9 |
| Single-Card Performance - HD2900 XT
(512 MB) PCIe 1.0a x16 vs 2.0 x16 |
fps | Percent |
| HD2900 XT (512 MB) PCIe 1.0a x16 | 1796.8 | 100.0 |
| HD2900 XT (512 MB) PCIe 2.0 x16 | 1832.8 | 102.0 |
| Single-Card Performance - 8800 GT
(512 MB) PCIe 1.0a x16 vs 2.0 x16 |
fps | Percent |
| 8800 GT (512 MB) OC PCIe 1.0a x16 | 2137.9 | 100.0 |
| 8800 GT (512 MB) OC PCIe 2.0 x16 | 2185.1 | 102.2 |
| Single-Card Performance - 8800 GTS
(512 MB) PCIe 1.0a x16 vs 2.0 x16 |
fps | Percent |
| 8800 GTS (512 MB) OC PCIe 1.0a x16 | 2235.3 | 100.0 |
| 8800 GTS (512 MB) OC PCIe 2.0 x16 | 2260.6 | 101.1 |
It remains to be seen what the situation will be when newer graphics cards such as the Geforce 9 or the Radeon 4xx0 begin transferring larger amounts of data over the bus. At any rate, the P35 and 975 chipsets are easily sufficient for the current generation of cards.
- Crossfire meets PCI Express 2.0 - More Lanes, More Frames? [Graphic & Displays]
- Gaming build <600 [Homebuilt Systems]
- First computer building need help [Homebuilt Systems]
- Upgrade Current System for ~$500 (Non-Gaming) [Homebuilt Systems]
- Possible build - please comment - Updated [Homebuilt Systems]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!





I read an article that was comparing PCIe cards into slots that were only 8x and 4x.
I was wondering if that means you can buy PCIe 2.0 cards and put them in a x16 slot (and still work; but with degraded performance).