- The Athlon 64 FX Overclocked to 3 GHz
- Live Stress Test Rundown: AMD vs. Intel
- The AMD and Intel Energy Crisis
- Athlon 64 FX-57: Great Performance, High Price
- Dual Core Stress Test: AMD vs. Intel
- Dothan Over Netburst: Is The Pentium 4 A Dead End?
- AMD's Dual Core Athlon 64 X2 Strikes Hard
- The Pentium D: Intel's Dual Core Silver Bullet Previewed
- Prescott Reworked: The P4 600 Series and Extreme Edition 3.73 GHz
- Fast Computer On The Cheap? The Sempron 3100+ On Overdrive
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: dual
Topics: AMD/ATI
Syndication:
Athlon 64 X2 4800+ And 4400+

The Toledo processor design is available in both 4800+ and 4400+ models, but could soon be joined by one or more counterparts. Anybody who studies the table presented in the previous section can't help but notice that a 4000+ model with a 1 MB L2 cache for each core is conspicuous by its absence. We're willing to speculate that AMD must already have a successor to its 3800+ waiting in the wings.
We must, however, cast a skeptical eye at whether a 4000+ model actually makes sense. That's because, as with other AMD processor families, boosting the base clock to 200 MHz makes a much bigger difference than doubling the L2 cache. If the price differences between models were linear, then the lower numbered model for each processor speed would win out (3800+ over 4000+, 4200+ over 4400+, and 4600+ over 4800+). But because price increases aren't linear, precise comparisons based purely on capabilities aren't possible - and that's doubly the case for completely-outfitted PC systems.



- Previous page Athlon 64 X2: 1 Or 2 MB Of L2 Cache?
- Next page Athlon 64 X2 4200 And 4600+