2:00 AM - 02/27/2009 by
Patrick Schmid and Achim Roos
- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (29) |
- Share
The streaming read benchmark also demands maximum performance from the drives, but it doesn’t request random data, rather running sequential read operations.
If you remember the throughput numbers, you’ll probably have expected these results: the Intel X25 SSDs dominate the throughput diagram, displayed this time as I/O operations per second. The two 15,000 RPM hard drives don’t do badly in this test, either.
However, the hard drives don’t stand a chance once power consumption is taken into consideration.
This results in excellent efficiency results for the X25 SSDs—again. However, Samsung’s SSD require far less power than the Intel drives in this benchmark, resulting in pretty good streaming efficiency as well.
Topics being discussed on the forums
- Need help with intel X25-E SSD in sony sz 120 laptop [Storage]
- X25-e / adaptec 5805 /raid0 throughput problem [Storage]
- Another i7-920 gaming build, please critique [Homebuilt Systems]
- WHO HAS THE BEST SCORE ON WIN7!!! YOU?? [Windows 7]
- Open SSD High Performance Territory–Intel X25-M 80GB PC&NB Platform [Storage]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!
- 1 / 2
- Next
-
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
Best offers
|
HDDR500E04XL 500GB Portable External... | $99.99 Dell Home More info |
|
Portable External 640GB 2.5" Hard... | $109.99 Directron More info |
|
My Passport Essential 500GB Portable... | $129.99 STAPLES More info |
|
Signature Mini Espresso Portable... | $139.99 STAPLES More info |
|
My Book Essential Edition External... | $148.00 ServerSupply.com More info |
Popular Searches
- x25 ssd
- which hard drive is the best for server
- sequential read
- hard drive reading efficiency
- x25 ssd drive
- fast server drives
- intel x25 e test
- intel’s x25 m flash ssd
- intel x25 ssd chart
- ssd throughput
- how do you read benchmark results
- intel x25 ssd problems
- intel x25e ssd
- test rpms of hard drive
- intel ssd power consumption
Partners
The Games selection
crazy :
PC Breakdown
What is worst than a Fatal Error occuring during a game you did not save? Unleash your rage at your PC in this game. Blow it to pieces, it feels so...
|
violent :
Interactive Buddy
Unwind on your interactive buddy: Do anything you want to him, it will earn you money, and you can buy other stuff to torture him with.
|
Ads
Recently, I've seen an article about performance degradation in the X25-M due to internal fragmentation, have you looked into if this also applies to the X25-E?
hard drive makers will be scratching their heads on this one. i've read some social networking and dating sites that uses around 200 to 600GB only of data.
Your previous review was of another flash-based product, the ioDrive from Fusion-io. If only you had included it's benchmarks in this article's figures, it would have been a most interesting shootoff. Any chance of updating the charts? Or do I just have to flip back and forth between the two articles?
Your previous review was of another flash-based product, the ioDrive from Fusion-io. If only you had included it's benchmarks in this article's figures, it would have been a most interesting shootoff. Any chance of updating the charts? Or do I just have to flip back and forth between the two articles?
I agree right after I clicked on this article the first thing I thought is I wonder how this compairs to the IODrive form IOFusion.
.... and a costs/performance chart with maybe total yearly costs with drive price, watt etc.. maybe even say something about the raid hardware you'll be able to save.
nice article though, good to see that for (rich) consumers the X25-M is the right choice.
So when can we expect Tom's to upgrade their servers with Intel X-25E's so that we can truly experience this amazing drive in real time???
I have one of these going into my new server I'm building actually. We'll eventually raid 4 of them. Should be a nice addition to the 4x Quad-core Shanghai's.
Your previous review was of another flash-based product, the ioDrive from Fusion-io. If only you had included it's benchmarks in this article's figures, it would have been a most interesting shootoff. Any chance of updating the charts? Or do I just have to flip back and forth between the two articles?
That's coming, probably next week, in a head-to-head between the two!
omg walks over the competition?
fusion-IO has over 100000 IO operations in the same benchmark as where this intel reaches ~6000...
don't believe me? read the IOdrive review. it utterly crushes the intel, the Mtron and all other SSD's, not to mention normal hard drives
I think you may have another bottleneck in your configuration. I have been able to get 250MB sustain read from both my MLC and SLC drives.
Could it be that the Nocona platform's chipset is limited on bandwith with its SATA connections? By the way I was refering to the Intel MLC and SLC.
That's coming, probably next week, in a head-to-head between the two!
Can you please include cost compassion? I am trying to figure out that for the same $$ which gives me a better value. So if I had $10,000 which would be a better buy.
Besides theoretical numbers, I haven't read anything about the real-world life-expectancy of these drives in workstations and/or high-volumn servers.
Can you please include cost compassion? I am trying to figure out that for the same $$ which gives me a better value. So if I had $10,000 which would be a better buy.
Area, the piece is already written, but I'll check to see if there's a discussion on cost.
Usually I'd say who cares about power consumption, but it actually makes sense in this article! An extra couple watts for a desktop becomes much much more in a server full of drives.
One thing I'd like to see is some sort of mainstream desktop hard drive in there purely for sake of comparison. Throw a Caviar blue in the mix or something - with just these benchmarks, I find it difficult to get a sense of the performance gap between these drives and the one in my desktop.
But good article guys, lots of data.
TEST THE PERFORMANCE OF THE DRIVES AT CERTAIN % POINTS - EMPTY, 20% 50% 70% AND 99% - the performance changes from what i hear - would love to know the results
Intel SSD's - making your porn load quicker!
When looking at power efficiency one should compare equal setups and I see power usage of storage of 32GB compared against up to 450GB here. One will need 14 of the smaller SSDs to hold the same data as one HD. Where does this comparo account for this?
When looking at power efficiency one should compare equal setups and I see power usage of storage of 32GB compared against up to 450GB here. One will need 14 of the smaller SSDs to hold the same data as one HD. Where does this comparo account for this?
When looking at power efficiency one should compare equal setups and I see power usage of storage of 32GB compared against up to 450GB here. One will need 14 of the smaller SSDs to hold the same data as one HD. Where does this comparo account for this?
The article looses a lot when the OCZ Vertex is not taken into account!
or, is it only available in EU?