The same sequence prepared with the slow motion codec. Artefacts occur especially in the transitions of individual people.
Our test clearly establishes that if video sequences are prepared up to a resolution of 352 x 288 pixels (half PAL resolution), then the slow motion codec is definitely better suited! In this range, the video quality of the slow motion codec is better in spite of a lower data rate than with the fast motion codec with a higher data rate. The situation is completely different if the resolution exceeds 352 x 288 pixels. In this case, the fast motion codec should be used, irrespective of the film content (fast or slow movement). By way of a test sequence, we used the DVD video "The Jackal", which was coded up to 720 x 576 pixels with different resolutions. Especially with a full PAL resolution it was shown that the fast motion codec produces very good video pictures with a relatively low average data rate.
|Video Resolution||MPEG-4-Codec, Data Rate||Overall Data Rate||Quality||Length of Film on CD-R|
|720 x 416 Pixels||Fast-Motion, max. 6000 kBit/s||145 kB/s||very good||83 min|
|720 x 416 Pixels||Fast-Motion, max. 900 kBit/s||128 kB/s||good||94 min|
|720 x 416 Pixels||Slow-Motion, max. 6000 kBit/s||216 kB/s||very good||55 min|
|720 x 416 Pixels||Slow-Motion, max. 900 kBit/s||128 kB/s||satisfactory||94 min|
This table compares the two MPEG-4 codecs with a full PAL resolution. The slow motion codec produces a higher data rate with high resolutions than the fast motion codec.
- Perfect MPEG-4 Video: Resolution, Data Rate And Picture Quality
- Optimization Of Flask Mpeg: Intel And AMD CPUs
- Choice Of The MPEG-4-Codec: Fast Vs. Slow Motion, Continued
- Focus On The MPEG-4 Fast Motion Codec
- Focus On The MPEG-4 Fast Motion Codec, Continued
- Low Resolutions: Better With Slow Motion Codec!
- Compromise: Quality Vs. Resolution
- Compromise: Quality Vs. Resolution, Continued
- Trimming: Without Edges A Lower Data Rate!
- 15 Percent Less Data Stream: Enable Deinterlace!, Continued
- 900 MB Video On One CD-ROM
- Conclusion: Fast Motion Is Very Efficient, But Not A Universal Solution, Continued