- Email |
- Print |
- Comments (36) |
- Share
LSI MegaRAID 9260-8i
Let’s look at the naming of these new controllers first. The designation “8i” stands for eight internal ports; “9200” is the new PCI Express 2.0 RAID-on-Chip generation; and RAID 6 is supported, which you can tell from the second part of the model number (“60”).
LSI offers two internal SFF-8087 MiniSAS connectors, which host four SAS/SATA connections each. The card is a low-profile design, which can also be deployed into compact 2U rackmount servers. You’ll just have to bend the cables, as the connectors point upwards towards the top of the rackmount enclosure.
Connectivity
LSI totally redesigned its architecture to meet the demands of SAS/600 environments. The RAID-on-Chip (RoC) architecture is built around an LSI SAS2108, which includes the x8 PCI Express 2.0 interface and SAS/600 connectivity (6 Gb/s).
It can access a 512 MB DDR2-800 cache memory, and a battery backup module (BBU) was already installed on our samples (though LSI says that the BBU is still an optional component). The BBU prevents data loss in case of power failure while unwritten data is still in the controller’s cache memory.
Performance?
According to LSI, the controller itself supports a maximum read throughput of 2,875 MB/s, and a peak write performance of 1,800 MB/s. Knowing that we’re using two controllers and Windows software-based RAID to create an array across two controllers (and two different PCI Express links) we’re clearly on the safe side regarding bandwidth.
LSI supports RAID levels 0, 1, 5, and 6 with double redundancy, as well as nested RAID levels 10, 50, and 60. We recommend looking at the controller’s datasheet on the LSI Web site for more details.
LSI MegaRAID 9210-8i
The 9210-8i, aka Intel RS2BL080, offers the same number of SAS/SATA ports as the 9260-8i, and the PCB has exactly the same dimensions, but the product is somewhat different, and much simpler overall. It does not feature a powerful RAID-on-Chip solution with XOR acceleration for RAID 5 and RAID 6; it does not come with cache memory; and it doesn’t feature a battery backup unit.
However, that strip-down may be helpful in terms of throughput, as there is no processing unit and no cache memory that might be trying to improve performance while effectively limiting it in our scenario (as was the case with Adaptec’s RAID 5805). Of course, it also helps with pricing, we're sure.
We don’t have much information on the 9210-8i, as it has not yet been officially released. It also utilizes PCI Express 2.0 (eight lanes) as one of the first products on the market, and it is ready for SAS/600 drives as well.
Creating a RAID 0 Stripeset on LSI’s 9200-8i Cards
The MegaRAID Storage Manager lists all LSI controllers and attached devices.
Once a RAID array has been created, it will also list the volumes, called Virtual Drives.
Creating an array can be done using simple commands, or by choosing the advanced option.
Once all drives are added into a new drive group, you can set parameters and policies. These were the settings we used.
- Building Professional Audio PC [Homebuilt Systems]
- Slow startup times; Event ID 100, Boot Performance Monitoring [Windows 7]
- Adaptec 5xxx Series RAID + Edge/Fanout Extenders [Storage]
- Have we gotten to the point that SSDs are worth it yet? [Storage]
- Dream build system advice [Homebuilt Systems]
Questions? Ask Tom's community!
- 1 / 2
- Next
-
Sponsored links
Related forums topics
- I7 Computer build for video editing Premiere CS4
- New build
- Buying Computer, Need Advise Please
- New Comp quesion
- Need help picking the type of cooling I should get
- Suggestions for High-End PC?
- Asus P6T X58, SLI, and a PCI-E1 sound card
- Need advice for photo editing i7 build
- Final touches/Check before purchase
- Plans for my New rigg.
- First Gaming PC Build
- ~$3,000 Mid- to High-Range Gaming System - Help, Suggestions, Comments
- WD Raptor Alternatives (Raid0)
- Hard Drives designed for RAID
Related articles
-
CPU: Intel Core i7-920 With a wide pricing spread between the three available LGA-1366 processors, a $2,500 budget limited this system to the least-expensive Core i7-920. There isn’t much to gain from moving to the Core i7-940, although the copper...
-
As already mentioned, we also compared four of the Memoright Flash SSDs in a RAID 0 array. We used four Seagate Savvio 10K.2 drives as well as four Western Digital WD1500 Raptor drives. We regret that we did not yet have access to four VelociRaptor...
-
This is probably the most important page in the benchmark section of this article. Let’s look at the results of the hard drives in a single-disk configuration, as well as two- and four-drive RAID 0. We’ll also compare the performance results with the...
Best offers
|
My Passport Essential 500GB Portable... | $129.99 STAPLES More info |
|
Caviar Black 1TB Hard Drive (Serial... | $99.99 Dell Small Business More info |
|
My Book Essential Edition External... | $148.00 ServerSupply.com More info |
|
X25-M Gen2 160GB 2.5" Solid State... | $509.95 PC Connection More info |
|
My Passport Essential Portable 320GB... | $134.00 ServerSupply.com More info |
Partners
The Games selection
adventure :
Ray
Adventure game, South Park style. Pick the way the story goes by picking an answer among those offered.
|
crazy :
Interactive Boogy
Pick one of the 3 songs, hit on the correct keys matching this boy's dance moves.
|














Holy cow, how much for the total damage?
It would be good to get a benchmark with a Windows XP/Vista/7 showing how long to boot the OS, various games, file copy speed... etc Fair enough these give fast throughput but where are the real world results?
What about some photos of the raid itself?
That's... such an overkill...
Personally, I would like to see a "Part II" to this article showing RAID 5, 6 and 10 setups with the same tests. No database admin or graphic designer, animator or CAD/CAM/GIS professional is going to use RAID 0 with it's inherent vulnerability, or at least they shouldn't.
It would be good to get a benchmark with a Windows XP/Vista/7 showing how long to boot the OS, various games, file copy speed... etc Fair enough these give fast throughput but where are the real world results?
I think with the cost of such a setup these would be ideal for a web or application server, or maybe a small data center. Booting Win 7 would be the least of your problems.
what vga was used?
I wonder if this is the type of storage used in super computers or render farms ?
"None of the SSDs currently available support Serial Attached SCSI (SAS) or 600 MB/s transfer speeds"
False: STEC's Zeus IOPs, and BitMicro's E-Disk Altima support SAS (Zeus supports SAS 6 Gbit). Though these cost about 3-5x more pr GB.
could it be that the computer's integrated graphics card is also connected to that bus and utilizes some bandwidth?
Another question I had is if you really notice a difference running whatever program on 2,2GB/s or 3,4GB/s? Even slow Vista should fly there.
Excellent article, thanks
I don't know about anyone else, but I would like to see Tom's including more pictures of the hardware actually in the Tom's office, set up, and being used in some of the articles that get posted.
So what you need now is for Intel to hook you up with another 6 drives and you can load up the onboard SATA controller, raid 0 that with the others. Or switch platforms to something designed for Quad SLI then really load up on the drives (plus onboard SATA of course.) I say dial up the ridiculous, then see how long it takes to boot/load games. New hobby for the super overclockers, make fastest raid 0 setup.
I'd like to see the actual setup myself, as well..
id love to see this myself as well...
It would be good to get a benchmark with a Windows XP/Vista/7 showing how long to boot the OS, various games, file copy speed... etc Fair enough these give fast throughput but where are the real world results?
As I've said before, it's not all a hardware RAID and thus isn't bootable.
I would love to see some high end Mobo's that incororate these new controllers to leave your PCIe slots free. I would bet it would not be cheap but it certainly would be awesome!
16x Intel X-25 E will set you down approx €10.000
16x Intel X-25 E will set you down approx €10.000
16x Intel X-25 E will set you down approx €10.000