Shop for Computers
16X DVD Duplicator 1:1

Compare the top 5 lowest prices by hovering your mouse over the product names on the left

$259.99
  3.5in 1.44MB External USB Floppy... $22.99
Kanguru - 4 HD KanguruClone Hard... $2257.99
750GB QS2 eSATA / USB 2.0 Combo... $172.95
16X 1-to-3 DVD Duplicator Tower 16X 1-to-3 DVD Duplicator Tower $499.99

See More Products...

Topics:

Using WindowsXP to Make RAID 5 Happen : WindowsXP RAID 5 Features Exploited

12:02 PM - November 19, 2004 by Patrick Schmid
Source: Tom's Hardware US – Keywords: windowsxp, make, raid, 5, happen
Topics: INTEL

Syndication: Add to your Google homepage Add to My Yahoo!

WindowsXP RAID 5 Features Exploited

There is a wide choice of hard drives from established players such as Hitachi, Maxtor, Seagate and Western Digital. For home or office use, a single disk is usually sufficient. But for enterprise networks, a cluster of several disks is often essential. The only problem is that these so-called RAID arrays are not exactly cheap.

Many motherboards have already built in RAID controllers, but not all of these are suitable for fileserver applications. Most of them only support the simple modes 0 and 1, and the combination of both called RAID 0+1 (striping & mirroring). While high capacity as well as outstanding performance can be accomplished by RAID 0, the risks of losing data due to a broken drive multiples by the amount of drives likewise. A happy medium between performance and data security can be achieved by a RAID 0+1, mirroring two RAID 0 arrays. The only downside is that the net capacity will be split in half.

If high capacity is first priority, the common option is a RAID 5, which distributes data to all array members and adds rotating parity information, too. The net capacity of the whole array is the sum of all drive's storage minus the capacity of one single drive. However, this solution is not as simple as it seems. Calculating the parity information as well as the real time reconstruction of data in case of a defective drive requires a lot of CPU performance. This forces the user to either buy a pretty expensive RAID controller with a built-in XOR unit, or to rely on a cheaper model that burdens the CPU with the XOR calculation.

So, why not use the RAID 5 software option? If the budget is tight and the usage of a simple RAID controller without the XOR unit is a possibility anyway, software based RAID 5 might be an equivalent choice. RAID 5 that Windows Server offers can include all existing drives, rendering a RAID 5 controller unnecessary. However, if you only need file services, not even the expensive Windows Sever license is needed, since WindowsXP is capable of sophisticated RAID functions after only a few modifications.


Talkback

Deleted profile 05/11/2008 4:45 AM
Hide
-0+
Can I grow an array made this way? That is, add another disk without having to lose the data currently held on the raid?
op365 06/28/2008 3:17 AM
Hide
-0+
op365
From past experience with Hardware RAID, you would have to first backup your data and then break the RAID and put in the higher capacity drives and create a new container.
The feature that you want/asking about is called X-RAID

Note You are going to post a comment as anonymous.