Titan Army P32A2S2 32-inch 240 Hz QHD gaming monitor review: Quick, bold color and a great value

The Titan Army P32A2S2 is a 32-inch QHD IPS gaming monitor with 240 Hz, Adaptive-Sync, HDR and wide gamut color

Reviews
By
published
Titan Army P32A2S2
(Image: © Tom's Hardware)

Why you can trust Tom's Hardware Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out more about how we test.

I have always been a fan of 32-inch 16:9 displays, and I use one for my daily work. But as a category, it doesn’t have the vast array of choices found at the 27-inch size. Most 32-inchers are Ultra HD and use more expensive tech like OLED or Mini LED. But for performance gaming, QHD is still the sweet spot for performance and price.

Titan Army P32A2S2

(Image credit: Titan Army)

Titan Army is a relative newcomer to the gaming monitor party, but the three displays (so far) I’ve reviewed from them have been excellent performers, especially in overdrive quality and low input lag. The P32A2S2 is one of the quickest monitors I’ve tested at any price. With a near-record 18ms of total lag and artifact-free motion processing, you won’t find much better unless you spend roughly double the money on an OLED.

(Image credit: Tom's Hardware)

Image quality gets solid attention as well. The P32A2S2 has better contrast than most IPS panels, around 1,300:1, and a large color gamut too. I measured over 93% coverage of DCI-P3 which is higher than average for budget screens. My only complaint was its lack of an sRGB mode. But I suspect few users will have a problem with that.

If you’ve been pining for a large monitor but want to stick with the 16:9 aspect ratio, the 32-inch Titan Army P32A2S2 is a great choice. It’s one of the few QHD 240 Hz screens in that size and it has gaming performance on par with the very best.

MORE: Best Gaming Monitors

MORE: How We Test PC Monitors

MORE: How to Buy a PC Monitor

MORE: How to Choose the Best HDR Monitor

Christian Eberle
Christian Eberle
Contributing Editor

Christian Eberle is a Contributing Editor for Tom's Hardware US. He's a veteran reviewer of A/V equipment, specializing in monitors. Christian began his obsession with tech when he built his first PC in 1991, a 286 running DOS 3.0 at a blazing 12MHz. In 2006, he undertook training from the Imaging Science Foundation in video calibration and testing and thus started a passion for precise imaging that persists to this day. He is also a professional musician with a degree from the New England Conservatory as a classical bassoonist which he used to good effect as a performer with the West Point Army Band from 1987 to 2013. He enjoys watching movies and listening to high-end audio in his custom-built home theater and can be seen riding trails near his home on a race-ready ICE VTX recumbent trike. Christian enjoys the endless summer in Florida where he lives with his wife and Chihuahua and plays with orchestras around the state.

3 Comments Comment from the forums
  • das_stig
    Stop saying "No internal speakers or USB ports" is a con, to some people it's a plus, it's all personal taste and not just a bias reporter !
    Reply
  • kyzarvs
    das_stig said:
    Stop saying "No internal speakers or USB ports" is a con, to some people it's a plus, it's all personal taste and not just a bias reporter !
    Exactly - why pay for speakers that are never going to be used?
    Reply
  • Pirx73
    das_stig said:
    Stop saying "No internal speakers or USB ports" is a con, to some people it's a plus, it's all personal taste and not just a bias reporter !
    Well, USB ports on monitor could be useful, while internal speakers - absolutely agree with you, they are useless. They are just one step above old PC beeper. Sound quality is nonexistant. I don't know why they keep including them, if only to rise price.
    Reply