New Windows 10 Features Announced, Build 10162 Makes It To Slow Ring

Latest Videos FromTom's Hardware
Michael Justin Allen Sexton is a Contributing Writer for Tom's Hardware US. He covers hardware component news, specializing in CPUs and motherboards.
  • Blinken
    get in a "groove" that you can't remove (from your OS), only $9.99!
    Reply
  • AggressorPrime
    Michael, I think your assumptions are wrong when you write:
    "Although at first blush this sounds great for users, it's reasonable to question if it's a practical move for Microsoft, as many users could download most if not all of their favorite music within a month."

    Don't expect Microsoft to let consumers download content in a normal .mp3 file format. According to their ToS found here (http://www.xbox.com/en-US/Legal/Usage-Rules):
    *Failure to sign into Services at least once every 30 days might allow digital licenses to expire and therefore deprive you of access to previously downloaded content
    **For music downloaded onto external devices, you may need to connect these devices to a computer and log into the Services to maintain access to content

    As such, you won't be able to keep access to all the music you download without a subscription. Most likely, Microsoft will use its own music app with its own file format that requires a license check every 30 days or becomes unplayable.
    Reply
  • SteelCity1981
    why must this stuff have to be installed on an os. why can't microsoft give people options to download this stuff separately is that too much to ask?
    Reply
  • Puiucs
    why must this stuff have to be installed on an os. why can't microsoft give people options to download this stuff separately is that too much to ask?
    when MS is trying to convince developers that apps on win 10 will be successful you are asking MS to remove proof of concept, first party apps apps from the final build? that seems like a stupid business decision if you ask me.
    Reply
  • jonathan1683
    why must this stuff have to be installed on an os. why can't microsoft give people options to download this stuff separately is that too much to ask?


    because the people that are willing to use it are too stupid to download it.
    Reply
  • TechyInAZ
    10130 build was a disaster for me, windows update would freeze every time I would try getting to 10159. So 10162 is a very reliable upgrade.
    Reply
  • jimmysmitty
    16196899 said:
    why must this stuff have to be installed on an os. why can't microsoft give people options to download this stuff separately is that too much to ask?

    Because Microsoft just can't win. If they include features, people (like yourself) complain. If they remove features, people complain (look at the backlash of no DVD codec).

    Why does it even matter if it is there or not? It is an app that will be disabled unless you use it and it probably doesn't take up much space. It looks like 10 will need 22GB at launch and 22GB these days is a drop in the bucket, even on a SSD with 256GB being easily affordable.
    Reply
  • alextheblue
    It looks like 10 will need 22GB at launch and 22GB these days is a drop in the bucket, even on a SSD with 256GB being easily affordable.

    Some configurations will actually use a lot less space than that. That's a full-blown desktop install. Look at how small they managed to get some 8.1 installs for tablets later into its lifecycle.
    Reply
  • MasterMace
    Microsoft needs to stop making crappy OSes, and stop releasing them every other year. People went from XP in 2000 (SP2 in 2004 made it good) to Windows 7 in 2009. Nobody wanted Windows 8 or 8.1. Microsoft needs to get rid of their crappy box fetish that they brought back from the 90s.
    Reply
  • Darkbreeze
    I hope they're working a lot of overtime. I'm still seeing a LOT of driver and other issues with peripheral hardware.
    Reply