Synology's DS408 Reviewed: Fast NAS For Pros

Technical Data And Features

The weight of the Synology Disk Station DS408 without hard drives is about 2.2 kg. It measures about 17 cm high, 18 cm wide, and 23 cm deep, which is dairly compact for a NAS device. You can connect the DS408 to a home network via a Gigabit Ethernet port and connect external storage media and printers to the two USB ports on the back of the device. The DS408 can also communicate with an uninterruptible power supply via USB.

Optimized For The Internet

The brain of the DS408 is an 800 MHz Freescale MPC8543 processor based on the PowerPC architecture. The 512 MB of onboard RAM not only guarantees fast response of the Web-based configuration interface, but this particular hardware configuration also accelerates other applications pre-loaded onto the DS408.

In addition to storing data, the Disk Station DS408 can also serve as Web server with PHP and MySQL support. The NAS device offers a simple way to post pictures and video on the Internet, a blog with integrated user management, as well as access to stored data via its Web interface.

UPnP Server And Network Protocols

The Universal Plug and Play-capable multimedia service and an iTunes server offer access to audio, video, and picture files on the network. All common formats are supported: MP3, WMA, WAV, MPEG2, MPEG4, VOB and XviD.

Currently there are still limitations when using the DS408 in a heterogeneous network. Although the protocols SMB/CIFS as well as AFP are supported, Linux users who want to get access via NFS have to remain patient: this feature is supposed to be implemented in one of the future firmware updates, which are already in the beta phase.

Active Directory Service support makes integration of the NAS device into a Window domain simple. With this, it is possible to authenticate users not only via SMB/CIFS or AFP, but also when requesting access using the FTP protocol.

You can activate the so-called CIFS recycle bin on the Disk Station DS408, so you do not permanently erase data that has been deleted unintentionally within Windows Explorer. This functions like the Windows recycle bin and can be emptied over the administrator’s interface.

Configuration with AJAX

Once you have installed the hard drives and the actual firmware using the Synology Assistant software on the NAS device, you can do the rest of the DS408 configuration by using the AJAX-based Web interface. This Web interface can be accessed via the Disk Station on port 5000, because port 80 is reserved for the integrated Web server.

Although you can argue the sense of using AJAX technology on Internet pages, Synology shows how to use this technology intelligently on a terminal. When configuring the Disk Station, you don’t feel like you’re working with a networked device, but rather a local Windows application.

The design of the Web interface is clear and simple, and assistants for different tasks—like creating user accounts or customizing file sharing settings—make life a lot easier for beginners. Advanced users will also get used to this in no time. For example, setting up an email notification when an error occurs is very easy.

Configuring the Web server, the blog, or the monitoring station—which can access and manage up to 10 IP cameras—is just as simple. Even setting up and managing data backups over the network is a breeze.

We could not find any incompatibilities with browsers in our test: the Web interface worked on Internet Explorer and Firefox without a problem. Even the Google browser Chrome didn’t cause any issues—far from it, in fact, as it loads the pages much faster and gives you even more of the feeling of configuring a local Windows configuration.

Marcel Binder
  • slomo4sho
    Wouldn't a HTPC style server with raid configured terabyte drives provide similar or better performance for a fraction of the cost? I mean the most expensive component in such a setup would be the dual LAN motherboard...
    Reply
  • VTOLfreak
    You don't even need a dual lan mobo. Just stick an extra NIC into a PCIe slot. (Or PCI)

    And you are right, a homebuilt server running some flavor of Linux would be faster and cheaper. You'd also be able to ditch your router and use the server as router aswell.

    The downside is ofcourse is that its a DIY job. You need to assemble the hardware yourself, then install and configure the whole thing. For some people thay may be a major problem.
    Reply
  • Actually VTOLfreak has a good point. A homebuilt server would cost about the same and completely kill this thing performance wise. Granted you'd would need to Do-It-Yourself but I would hope most Tom's readers are already DIY type. :D I should also point out that the QNAP NAS's are only slightly slower and the Linux community has already hacked / ported a version of Debian Linux in testing to it. It's what I plan on doing with my QNAP NAS to release it's full functionality. Here's the website: http://www.cyrius.com/debian/orion/qnap/
    Reply
  • malveaux
    Heya,

    NAS will never match a computer with the disks in the box over a network's performance. NAS is simple. This NAS box they're talking about is an expensive "computer" with no hardware. You could get a cheap motherboard/CPU/RAM/Case for like $200 bare bones (you don't need a dualcore for this; hence most folk at home with NAS just converted an old computer into one) and just toss in some drives and you're set so long as you have a gigabit lan card installed. All cheap. Install FREENAS and put the thing in a closet or wherever and forget it.

    These expensive empty NAS chasis are essentially for small businesses that want it to be absolutely simplistic and don't mind overpaying for something their IT guy could build for cheaper and likely more reliable.

    Cheers,
    Reply
  • malveaux
    My god, $750?

    Mobo with onboard video and onboard RAID5 and gigabit LAN at newegg: $150
    AMD5000+ retail $60 at newegg
    RAM, 2gigs DDR2 800 $50 at newegg
    Case with 300~400watt PSU, $50 at newegg
    WD 640g 7200rpm drive $75 at newegg
    FreeNAS - Free at freenas.org

    $310 for the system and the OS.

    Get 5 WD 640g 7200rpm drives @ $75 each, for $375

    Configure in a RAID5 setup: 2.5 tb of storage with parity against a drive fail.

    $685.

    Still cheaper than that "pro" nas thing. Faster. And it has potential to be added to beyond it's limited walls unlike that "pro" nas box there.

    Cheers,
    Reply
  • zak_mckraken
    I've been looking around for a NAS solution myself and I still can't decide what would be the best for me. So far I've been looking at that setup:
    Chenbro ES34069 + riser card : 240,00 $
    Intel D945GCLF2 + Atom Dual Core 1.6ghz : 103,08 $
    Kingston 2go KVR667D2N5K2/2G : 36,15 $
    Promise Fasttrak TX4310 Raid 5 : 149,04 $
    Seagate 500go ST3500320AS X3 : 228,54$ (76,18 $ each)
    Total : 756,81 $

    BTW, these prices are in candadian dollars. What really raises the bill are the raid card and the case. I've been looking for a Mini-ITX mainly for the fun of building such a small PC but I'm not sure if it's worth the price yet. It will also take less space and consume less power than a normal PC but then again is it worth paying over 200$ more?

    I'm also worried about Raid 5 performance. With such a setup, I would have 1tb of data in Raid 5 on a gigabit LAN. My initial plan is to replace (not just backup) my multimedia files on my computer and mapmy personal folder directly to the NAS. This way, I would have more space on my computer and the files would also be available to stream from my 360. Do you think such a setup would be seamless for my computer or will I experience some lag with the mapped folders?
    Reply
  • daft
    malveauxMy god, $750?Mobo with onboard video and onboard RAID5 and gigabit LAN at newegg: $150AMD5000+ retail $60 at neweggRAM, 2gigs DDR2 800 $50 at neweggCase with 300~400watt PSU, $50 at neweggWD 640g 7200rpm drive $75 at neweggFreeNAS - Free at freenas.org$310 for the system and the OS.Get 5 WD 640g 7200rpm drives @ $75 each, for $375Configure in a RAID5 setup: 2.5 tb of storage with parity against a drive fail.$685.Still cheaper than that "pro" nas thing. Faster. And it has potential to be added to beyond it's limited walls unlike that "pro" nas box there.Cheers,
    its a NAS, it doesn't need that high end of a mobo
    (all parts newegg)
    cpu: AMD x2 5000+ $59
    mobo: Foxconn A74MX-K $50
    Case: Linkworld PRESCOTT 437-01-C2222 Black SECC/SGCC MicroATX Mid Tower Computer 430 watt PSU $33
    Ram: OCZ OCZ2VU8002GK 2x1GB ddr2 800 $24
    NIC: Zonet 10/100 (not everyone has 100+ Mb internet access)$10
    HDD: 4X SAMSUNG HD103UI 1TB 5400 RPM $99 each $396 total
    3x molex to sata cable $3 each $6.87 total (savings)

    total $578.79 with shipping $609.32



    Reply
  • snarfies1
    So far every NAS I've ever seen falls into one of two categories - crap that doesn't work well/right, and/or insanely expensive. The first company who comes up with a solution that doesn't fall into either category will have my money. Until then, do not want.
    Reply
  • doittoit
    I struggled with this for months. Here's what I did and why:

    I already had an old northwood 3.0 and raid capable motherboard for which I found a new bios for that supported raid 5. The board has a GB ethernet NIC integral to it. I started out buying a case ($59, 7 x 3 1/2" internal, 5 x 5 1/4" external) and a tagan 700W single 12v rail PS ($80). I bought 3 x samsung spinpoint F1 750 GB sata II ($99 ea). Put xp on it, built the array with a stripe size of 32k. 15 MB/s write, 50 MB/s read. Pathetic!! Pulled out a drive, formatted it on another PC, and stuck it back in for a rebuild of the ~1.4 TB array. After running for 4 days and not completing, I pulled the plug.

    Phase 2 additions:
    Intel DG33TL motherboard ($99). Integrated video, HD audio (digital in, digital out), Intel GBe, ICH9R onboard. Intel e7200 CPU ($99) - 65W TDP, 4 x corsair XMS2 2 GB PC6400 DDR2 ($55 per pair - total $110).
    Bought a ocpy of vista64 to address the 8GB ram AND create GPT > 2TB. Bought another samsung spnpoint F1 ( so now 4 x 750 in raid 5) in 1 ~2.1TB volume.

    I used passmark to benchmark seq read, seq write, and random access locally. Over 200 MB/s read and write locally. Random access ~10MB/s. I used the same Intel NAS benchmark suite and got over double performance in every single benchmark over the network that the reviewed NAS got. Rebuild of the array takes ~4 hours.

    Approximately $850 + OS. Found a hack to put the terminal services DDL from server 2008 on vista64 sp1 so I can have multiple simultaneous users remoted-in. I have MySQL, SQL Server 2005, and SQL Server 2008 installed, antivirus, centralized backup of all PC's on the network to one location.

    In my opinion, unless it is REALLY CHEAP, NAS is a waste of money. If you can administer this NAS (raid level, permissions), then you can administer the "server" I describe with the added bonus of being able to use a windows interface.
    Reply
  • falcompsx
    doittoit If you can administer this NAS (raid level, permissions), then you can administer the "server" I describe with the added bonus of being able to use a windows interface.
    not to mention if you buy windows you can let it double as a media center as well. Might need a few upgrades to be HD capable, but it would serve 480P media just fine as is, probably even 720P.
    Reply