We compared the Radeon 9500 PRO with ATI's brand new range and with the NVIDIA GeForce 4 Ti 4600 and Ti4200-8x. To stretch the cards to their limits, we ran our tests using a powerful 3.06 GHz Pentium 4. If you are interested in how the cards perform with a slower CPU (2.2 GHz), take a look at the preview article that we published four weeks ago.
|Processor||Intel Pentium 4 3.06 GHz|
|Memory||2 x 256 MB, PC333 cl2|
|Graphic Cards||NVIDIA GeForce4 Ti4200 128 MBNVIDIA GeForce4 Ti4600ATI Radeon 9000 ProATI Radeon 9500 ProATI Radeon 9700ATI Radeon 9700 PRO|
|Drivers & Software|
|Graphics Driver||NVIDIA - v. 40.72 WHQLATI - v. 02.4 (184.108.40.20600)|
|OS||Windows XP Professional SP1|
|Benchmarks & Settings|
|Aquanox||Retail Version v1.17|
|Max Payne||Retail Version v1.05Benchmark using 'Shooting Alex'|
|Unreal Tournament||Demo v1.1|
|2003 Demo||Antalus Benchmark|
|3D Mark 2001 SE||Pro Version, Build 330|
The reduced memory bandwidth is quite noticeable in Aquanox. In 1280x1024, the 9500 PRO was 46% slower than the 9700 PRO and only marginally ahead of the Ti 4200-8x. The GeForce 4 Ti 4600 was a good 10 - 15% faster in all resolutions.
Current page: Test SetupPrev Page A Comparison With The Radeon 9500 PRO Next Page Max Payne
Stay on the Cutting Edge
Join the experts who read Tom's Hardware for the inside track on enthusiast PC tech news — and have for over 25 years. We'll send breaking news and in-depth reviews of CPUs, GPUs, AI, maker hardware and more straight to your inbox.