Microsoft Windows boss posts lackluster response to ‘agentic OS’ backlash — Microsoft is working to address broad problems with the OS

Earlier this month, Microsoft described its vision of Windows evolving into an “agentic” operating system that takes action on your behalf, prompting a wave of backlash from users who argued the company had deprioritized performance in favor of automation that nobody wanted nor asked for. Many pointed to longstanding issues with performance, UX fragmentation, and developer-hostile defaults, asking why those problems weren’t being addressed first.

In a recent reply posted to X, aimed at an original post by writer and engineer Gergely Orosz, Davuluri acknowledged the volume of complaints but stopped short of directly engaging with the core critiques.

“The team (and I) take in a ton of feedback. We balance what we see in our product feedback systems with what we hear directly. They don’t always match, but both are important,” wrote the Windows exec.

Davuluri added that he had “read through the comments and see focus on things like reliability, performance, ease of use and more.” He reiterated that Microsoft “cares deeply about developers” and said the company discusses "these pain points and others in detail, because we want developers to choose Windows."

He conceded that Microsoft has “work to do on the experience,” citing “inconsistent dialogs” and “power user experiences” as examples, but offered no specifics on what changes might be made or when they would arrive.

Underwhelming

The response is, as has unfortunately become par for the course, underwhelming and empty. While Davuluri’s tone is measured and conciliatory, the post doesn’t clarify Microsoft’s agentic OS roadmap or address the developer sentiment that prompted the backlash. At no point does he mention the concerns around system bloat, hardware lock-ins, or the sense that Copilot integrations are arriving before longstanding design issues have been resolved.

Microsoft has not followed up the agentic OS announcement with any detailed public roadmap or technical explanation of what users can expect in future Windows builds. For both your everyday and power users alike, the gap between messaging and actual, measurable action in response to widespread criticism remains stark.

As it stands, the post appears more focused on de-escalation than engagement. Davuluri closed with a call to connect privately, but public replies suggest many in the community are still waiting for more than a DM.

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.