Baidu CEO warns AI is just an inevitable bubble — 99% of AI companies are at risk of failing when the bubble bursts
The tech mogul claims it will take 10 to 30 years before AI displaces human jobs.
Silicon Valley has had one too many episodes of companies transforming from rags to riches. Today, we see giants like Nvidia and OpenAI at the frontiers of Artificial Intelligence—with every single company now in full throttle to get their hands on a piece of the pie. Interestingly, Baidu CEO Robin Li, speaking at the Harvard Business Review's Future of Business conference, predicts that AI is just another bubble, like the dot-com bubble. Ultimately, only 1% of companies will remain afloat in this cutthroat industry.
For reference, Nvidia's market cap rose tenfold over just two years, going from a modest $300 Billion to an eyewatering $3.4 Trillion. Tech giants such as Google, Microsoft, and Apple are pouring billions upon billions of dollars into AI - even chipmakers such as AMD and Intel have dissected their server-grade offerings into chips reserved for low-precision computing like FP8, FP6, and FP4; the very resource that AI relies on. It is clear that AI is all the hype these days, and you don't need us to tell you that.
Robin Li says increased accuracy is one of the largest improvements we've seen in Artificial Intelligence. "I think over the past 18 months, that problem has pretty much been solved—meaning when you talk to a chatbot, a frontier model-based chatbot, you can basically trust the answer," the CEO added.
A train can only carry so many people; likewise, Robin says that AI is just an "inevitable bubble, " similar to the dot-com bubble in the late 90s and the mobile internet market. Li goes as far as to say that this period of uncertainty is healthy and will cleanse the AI market from all the "fake innovations or products" that are unfit for consumer demand; “probably 1% of the companies will stand out and become huge and will create a lot of value, or will create tremendous value for the people, for society. And I think we are just going through this kind of process.”
The CEO reassures that it will take at least 10 to 30 years before Artificial Intelligence replaces human jobs. In any case, it should be evident that Robin Li has clear and straightforward objectives for Baidu and does not want to follow the path of other opportunistic players in the market.
Stay On the Cutting Edge: Get the Tom's Hardware Newsletter
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.
Hassam Nasir is a die-hard hardware enthusiast with years of experience as a tech editor and writer, focusing on detailed CPU comparisons and general hardware news. When he’s not working, you’ll find him bending tubes for his ever-evolving custom water-loop gaming rig or benchmarking the latest CPUs and GPUs just for fun.
-
hotaru251 The CEO reassures that it will take at least 10 to 30 years before Artificial Intelligence replaces human jobs.
should added asterisk as ai is already replacing human jobs in some fields. -
helper800
What specific field or job has been replaced, supplemented, or otherwise integrated AI to the point a person is out of a job? I can only think of typical automation that is currently replacing jobs, not AI.hotaru251 said:should added asterisk as ai is already replacing human jobs in some fields. -
Kamen Rider Blade Most people who are following what's going on knows that this is a "Artificially Created Gold Rush" by nVIDIA.Reply
It's going to burst harder, and ALOT of people will be losing their jobs because of it. -
vanadiel007 If you look up Baidu, you will see they have invested heavily over the past 10 years in AI.Reply
So I am not sure what he's trying to say here... -
Alvar "Miles" Udell There's a number of people that have been saying AI is a bubble for some time, and most every publication that talks about AI, TomsHardware included, does as well. Companies dealing with AI are going to have to start showing a profit on their rather large investments before shareholders and investors get fed up and take their money elsewhere.Reply -
ivan_vy
this. AI need to be viable in the economic sense, when is gonna be cheaper to have a bot than pay to an overseas worker, be a call center o fiverr freelance, then AI is going to replace jobs. Now we are not there yet.Alvar Miles Udell said:There's a number of people that have been saying AI is a bubble for some time, and most every publication that talks about AI, TomsHardware included, does as well. Companies dealing with AI are going to have to start showing a profit on their rather large investments before shareholders and investors get fed up and take their money elsewhere. -
ottonis The Baidu CEO clearly has a point. Nowadays, virtually every company somehow manages to put an "AI"-tag onto their products, services or their infrastructure - but not because of a significant part of them was related to AI but just because "AI" has become a fancy word that everyone and their cat seems to expect. Insofer, yes, it is a bubble right now.Reply
On the other hand: the development of AI is virtually exponential, no other technonolgy with disruptive potential has ever shown such a fast and steep progression as has AI within the past few years.
So, as "unfit" current LLMs still seem to be in order to replace real human workforce, they are improving much faster than anything else has in history. So, either, AI hits a roadblock and cannot really take certain hurdles, or it will be able to replace human workforce much faster than these 10-30 years that the Baidu-CEO predicted.
And one more point: Since only few people on this planet really fully understand how AI works deep inside, there is a potential risk that such a technology that has the potenial to surpass the capabilities of human mind, might eventually become capable of harming humans. -
helper800
That's certainly an opinion. I would say no. How useful are AI products for you? How much have you spent on those products because they have "AI"? Are you aware that most of the large tech companies have heavily leveraged their financials trying to chase the new gold rush that is AI and gotten almost no return on their investments?dalek1234 said:chinese propaganda Bs?