ChatGPT chief Sam Altman says AI could eliminate jobs that aren’t ‘real work’ — comments come among mounting evidence of jobs being replaced by AI
The OpenAI CEO's DevDay remarks drew criticism, but some argue AI is exposing just how much modern work has become task-driven and inefficient.
Sam Altman isn’t known for understatement, but even by his own standards, what he said on stage at OpenAI’s DevDay conference earlier this month was pretty problematic. In a live interview with AI newsletter founder Rowan Cheung, Altman made a sweeping claim that many jobs that vanish in the age of large language models might not have been “real work” in the first place.
Responding to a thought experiment about how a farmer from 50 years ago might view our current reality, Altman said, “The thing about that farmer… [is that] they very likely would look at what you do and I do and say, ‘that’s not real work.’” Altman said this makes him feel “a little less worried… [but] more worried in some ways. If you’re… farming… you’re doing something people really need. This is real work.”
It’s a statement that has been clipped, memed, and torn to shreds on social media, labelled everything from callous to dystopian. But in fairness to Altman, he’s not the first person to suggest that swathes of modern work is little more than performance art. A decade ago, the late anthropologist David Graeber wrote On the Phenomenon of Bullshit Jobs, arguing that many workers secretly believe their jobs are pointless. The essay went viral and was later published as a bestselling book in 2018.
Graeber’s core claim — that entire sectors of the economy are built on box-ticking bureaucracy with no social value — has been cited by everyone from disgruntled office workers to policy think tanks. Altman’s framing felt smug, sure, but it’s not without precedent.
The trouble is, the data hasn’t really backed it up. A 2021 study using the European Social Survey found that only about five percent of people said their jobs felt useless. A similar U.S. study put that number closer to twenty percent. In both cases, the researchers concluded that feelings of pointlessness were more about poor management and work culture than about the job itself. If your boss is a micromanager and your workflow is broken, even valuable work can feel fake. That’s not proof that the role should be automated out of existence.
Where Altman’s comment holds water is in what it hints at, even if it doesn’t spell it out. Most jobs aren’t fake, but many have accumulated layers of automatable junk: compliance checklists, reports nobody reads, emails summarizing meetings that could’ve been Slack threads. That’s the kind of “game-playing” work LLMs are already good at. When Altman says these models will wipe out tasks, not just roles, this is what he likely means. And on that point, he could be right.
Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.
Get Tom's Hardware's best news and in-depth reviews, straight to your inbox.

Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist. Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory.
-
Notton “Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them.”Reply
― Frank Herbert, Dune -
ezst036 "If organizers can deliver millions of dollars in cash benefits to the ghetto masses, it seems reasonable to expect that the masses will deliver their loyalties to their benefactors."Reply
- Frances Fox Piven, The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty
If AI kills the vast majority of the jobs, UBI is the natural result. If everyone can be forced into UBI, then the entire country will vote for the welfare party. Forever. This is exactly in line with the Frank Herbert quote above. It's just the next inevitable step. -
DavidM012 Your leisure is their work and your work is their leisure. It's not work if you enjoy it or gruelling back breaking labor for a pittance.Reply
Cutting hair is someone's job or you can buy razor and shave all your hair off. It simply isn't easy to cut your own hair neatly with two mirrors in the style you like and save what is now £15-£17 for a trim.
So is cutting nails or making sandwiches or tour guides or caring for an elderly relative. You can patch up your shoes with superglue or take them to a cobblers with all the machines and tools and get it done properly and pay a proportion (per capita) of all the machinery for what they call economies of scale eg. there are advantages and disadvantages to a variety of strategic approaches to solve the common problems of the business of living in the university of life.
Some people think time is money and so delegate. I can do quantum research if you'd be so kind to make the sandwiches. Then combine automated factories with quantum processing AgI which can estimate the quantities of produce required accurately. In the pie in the sky fi future.
20 borg are about to break through that door, sing a song, do dance, distract them
Tshtch. Quartermaster, out. -
SomeoneElse23 Once upon a time I knew of a customer that printed out a 300+ page report, every day, and reconciled it against their daily transactions. That was her job.Reply
There are regularly better ways to do things.
AI can help with it, and in some cases, replace it. -
rluker5 I think AI will also make new jobs in 5-10 years if it really caches on.Reply
I believe that a lazy segment of society will increasingly rely on AI to do a large part of their thinking for them and will need help with basic decisions.
Will AI fill these jobs of helping the helpless as well?
Imagine the power that AI bias will have over these people.
As confidants, advisors, public school teachers.
The fertility rate is not going to be going up anytime soon. Maybe there will be social cliques around particular AI brands.
AI sounds fairly useless to a relative old timer like me, but so did using search for everything. Kids in high school and younger have no qualms about using whatever is convenient so long as it works. And AI is often convenient.
I still don't know how they will be able to sufficiently monetize it to get a positive ROI though. -
Findecanor To Tom's Hardware: Please give us a checkbox that we can check, to avoid getting the daily "Shit a billionaire says", so that those who want to don't have to see it among the actual tech news and reviews. It is getting a little tiring.Reply